Skip to main content

Field Theory as it Pertains to Sep Analysis

  • Chapter
Neural Monitoring

Part of the book series: Neurotrauma ((NT))

  • 52 Accesses

Abstract

The near-field potential (NFP) and far-field potential (FFP) distinguish two different manifestations of the volume conducted field (Jewett and Williston, 1971). The NFP represents the propagating action potential as detected when the impulse passes under the pick-up electrodes, whereas the FFP relates to a stationary potential generated by the signal away from the recording site. A bipolar derivation, used in conventional nerve conduction studies, registers primarily, though not exclusively, NFP from the axonal volley along the course of the nerve. In contrast, a referential montage preferentially detects FFP, although it may also register NFP, if the impulse passes near the electrodes. The far-field recording has gained popularity in the study of evoked potentials for detection of a voltage source generated at a distance (Allison, Wood, McCarthy et al., 1982; Celesia, 1985; Chiappa, Choi and Young, 1980; Cracco, 1972; Cracco and Cracco, 1976; Desmedt and Cheron, 1981, 1983; Desmedt, Huy and Carmeliet, 1983; Eisen, 1982; Emerson and Pedley, 1984; Emerson, Seyal and Pedley 1984; Luders, Dinner, Lesser et al., 1983; Luders, Lesser, Hahn et al., 1983; MacCabee, Pinkhasov and Cracco, 1983).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allison T., Wood C.C., McCarthy, G., Hume A.L. and Goff, W.R.: Short-latency somatosensory-evoked potentials in man, monkey, cat, and rat: Comparative latency analysis. In Courjon, J., Mauguiere, F., and Revol, M. (eds), Clinical Applications of Evoked Potentials in Neurology, pp. 303–310, Raven Press, New York, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arezzo, J.C., Legatt, A.D. and Vaughan, H.G.: Topography and intracranial sources of somatosensory-evoked potentials in the monkey. I. Early components. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 46:155–172, 1979.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Arezzo, J.C. and Vaughan, H.G., Jr.: The contribution of afferent fiber tracts to the somatosensory-evoked potentials. In Bodis-Wollner (ed), Evoked Potentials, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 388:679–682, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buchthal, F. and Rosenfalck, A.: Evoked action potentials and conduction velocity in human sensory nerves. Brain Res. 3:1–119, 1966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Celesia, G.G.: Somatosensory-evoked potentials: A quest for relevance. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2:77–82, 1985.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chiappa, K.H., Choi, S.K. and Young R.R.: Short-latency somatosensory-evoked potentials following median nerve stimulation in patients with neurological lesions. In Desmedt, J.E. (ed), Clinical Uses of Cerebral Brainstem and Spinal Somatosensory-evoked Potentials, Progress in Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 7, pp. 264–281, Karger, Basel, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cracco, R.Q.: The initial positive potential of human scalp-recorded somatosensory-evoked response. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 32:623–629, 1972.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cracco, R.Q and Cracco, J.B.: Somatosensory-evoked potential in man: far-field potentials. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 41:460–466, 1976.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cunningham, K., Hallidy, A.M. and Jones, S.J.: Stationary peaks caused by abrupt changes in volume conductor dimensions: potential field modeling. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. (abstract) 61:S100, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dawson, G.D. and Scott, J.W.: The recording of nerve action potentials through skin on man. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 12:259–267, 1949.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Desmedt, J.E. and Cheron, G.: Central somatosensory conduction in man: neural generators and interpeak latencies of the far-field components recorded from neck and right or left scalp and earlobes. Electroen-cephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 50:382–403, 1980.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Desmedt, J.E. and Cheron, 6.: Non-cephalic reference recording of early somatosensory potentials to finger stimulation in adult or aging normal man: differentiation of widespread N18 and contralateral N2O from preroladnic P22 and N30 components. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 52:553–570, 1981.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Desmedt, J.E. and Cheron, G.: Spinal and far-field components of human somatosensory-evoked potential to posterior tibial nerve stimulation analyzed with oesophageal derivations and non-cephalic reference recording. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 56:635–651, 1983.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Desmedt, J.E., Huy, N.T. and Carmeliet, J.: Unexpected latency shifts of the stationary P9 somatosensory-evoked potential far-field with changes in shoulder position. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 56:623–627, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Eisen, A.: The somatosensory-evoked potential. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 9:65–77, 1982.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Eisen, A., Odusote, K., Bozek, C. and Hoirch, M.: Far-field potentials from peripheral nerve: generated at sites of muscle mass change. Neurology 36:815–818, 1986.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Emerson, R.G. and Pedley, T.A.: Generator sources of median somatosensory-evoked potentials. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1:203–218, 1984.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Emerson, R.G., Seyal, M. and Pedley, T.A.: Somatosensory-evoked potentials following median nerve stimulation. I. The cervical components. Brain 107:169–182, 1984.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Frith, R.W., Benstead, T.B. and Daube, J.R.: The SEP standing waveform at the shoulder due to a change in volume conductor. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 61:S272, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jewett, D.L.: Volume-conducted potentials in response to auditory stimuli as detected by averaging in the cat. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 28:609–618, 1970.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jewett, D.L. and Williston, J.S.: Auditory-evoked far-fields averaged from the scalp of humans. Brain 94:681–696, 1971.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jones, S.J.: Short latency potentials recorded from the neck and scalp following median stimulation in man. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 43:683–853, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kakigi, R., Shibasaki, H., Hashizume, A. and Kuroiwa, Y.: Short latency somatosensory-evoked spinal and scalp-recorded potentials following posterior tibial nerve stimulation in man. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 53:602–611, 1982.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kimura, J.: Field theory: the origin of stationary peaks from a moving source. In International Symposium on Somatosensory-Evoked Potentials, Rochester, MN, Custom Printing Inc., pp. 39–50, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kimura, J. Kimura, A., Ishida, T., Kudo, Y., Suzuki, S., Machida, M. and Yamada, T.: What determines the latency and the amplitude of stationary peaks in far-field recordings? Ann. Neurol. 19:479–486, 1986.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kimura, J., Mit sudome, A., Beck, D.O., Yamada, T. and Dickins, Q.S.: Field distribution of antidromically activated digital nerve potentials: model for far-field recording. Neurology 33:1164–1169, 1983.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kimura, J., Mitsudome, A., Yamada, T. and Dickins, Q.S.: Stationary peaks from a moving source in far-field recording. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 58:351–361, 1984.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kimura, J. and Yamada, T.: Short-latency somatosensory-evoked potentials following median nerve stimulation. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 388:689–694, 1982.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kimura, J., Yamada, T., Shivapour, E. and Dickins, Q.S.: Neural pathways of somatosensory-evoked potentials: clinical implication. In Buser, P.A., Cobb, W.A. and Okuma, T. (eds), Kyoto Symposium (Electroencephalogr. Suppl. 36), Amsterdam, Elsevier, pp. 328–335, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lin, J.T., Phillips, L.H. II, and Daube, J.R.: Far-field potentials recorded from peripheral nerves. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 50:174, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lorente, de NO: A study of nerve physiology. Studies from the Rockefeller Institute 132:Chapt 16, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Luders, H., Andrish, J., Gurd, A., Weiker, G. and Klem, G.: Origin of far-field subcortical potentials evoked by stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 52:336–344, 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Luders, H., Dinner, S.D., Lesser, R.P. and Klem, G.: Origin of far-field subcortical evoked potentials to posterior tibial and median nerve stimulation. Arch. Neurol. 40:93–97, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Luders, H., Lesser, R., Hahn, J., Little, J. and Klem, G.: Subcortical somatosensory-evoked potentials to median nerve stimulation. Brain 106, 341–372, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. MacCabee, P.J., Pinkhasov, E.I. and Cracco, R.Q.: Short latency evoked potentials to median nerve stimulation: effect of low frequency filter. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 55:34–44, 1983.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Nakanishi, T.: Action potentials recorded by fluid electrodes. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 53:343–345, 1982.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Nakanishi, T.: Origin of action potential recorded by fluid electrodes. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 55:114–115, 1983.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Nakanishi, T. Tamaki, M., Arasaki, K. and Kudo, N.: Origins of the scalp-recorded somatosensory far-field potentials in man and cat. In Buser, P.A., Cobb, W.A. and Okuma, T. (eds), Kyoto Symposia, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., Suppl. no. 36, pp 336–348, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Noel, P. and Desmedt, J.E.: Cerebral and far-field somatosensory-evoked potentials in neurological disorders. In Desmedt, J.E. (ed), Clinical Use of Cerebral, Brainstem and Spinal Somatosensory-evoked Potentials, Progr. Clin. Neurophysiol. vol. 7, Karger, Basel, pp. 205, 230, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sears, T.A.: Action potentials evoked in digital nerves by stimulation of mechanoreceptors in the human finger. J. Physiol. (London) 148:30–31, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sohmer, H. and Feinmesser, M.: Cochlear and cortical audiometry conveniently recorded in the same subject. Israel J. Med. Sci. 6:219–223, 1970.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Stegeman, D., Van Oosteron, A. and Colon, E.: Stimulation of far-field stationary potentials due to changes in the volume conductor. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. (abstract) 61:S228, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Vaughan, H.G., Jr.: The neural origins of human event-related potentials. In Bodis-Wollner, I. (ed), Evoked Potentials, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 388:125–138, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wiederholt, W.C. and Iragui-Madoz, V.J.: Far-field somatosensory potentials in the rat. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 42:456–465, 1977.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Wood, C.C. and Allison, T.: Interpretation of evoked potentials: a neurophysiological perspective. Can. J. Pyschol/Rev. 35(2):113–135, 1981.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Woodbury, J.W.: Potentials in a volume conductor. In Ruch, T.C. Patton, H.D., Woodbury, J.W. and Towe, A.L. (eds), Neurophysiology, Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders, pp. 85–91, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Yamada, T., Kimura, J. and Nitz, D.M.: Short latency somatosensory-evoked potentials following median nerve stimulation in man. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 48:367–376, 1980.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Yamada, T., Machida, M. and Kimura, J.: Far-field somatosensory-evoked potentials after stimulation of the tibial nerve in man. Neurology (New York) 32:1151–1158, 1982.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Yamada, T., Machida, M., Oishi, M., Kimura, A., Kimura, J., and Rodnitzky, R.L.: Stationary negative potentials near the source vs. positive far-field potentials at a distance. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 60:509–524, 1985.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kimura, J. (1990). Field Theory as it Pertains to Sep Analysis. In: Salzman, S.K. (eds) Neural Monitoring. Neurotrauma. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0491-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0491-6_1

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-6786-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-0491-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics