Abstract
The near-field potential (NFP) and far-field potential (FFP) distinguish two different manifestations of the volume conducted field (Jewett and Williston, 1971). The NFP represents the propagating action potential as detected when the impulse passes under the pick-up electrodes, whereas the FFP relates to a stationary potential generated by the signal away from the recording site. A bipolar derivation, used in conventional nerve conduction studies, registers primarily, though not exclusively, NFP from the axonal volley along the course of the nerve. In contrast, a referential montage preferentially detects FFP, although it may also register NFP, if the impulse passes near the electrodes. The far-field recording has gained popularity in the study of evoked potentials for detection of a voltage source generated at a distance (Allison, Wood, McCarthy et al., 1982; Celesia, 1985; Chiappa, Choi and Young, 1980; Cracco, 1972; Cracco and Cracco, 1976; Desmedt and Cheron, 1981, 1983; Desmedt, Huy and Carmeliet, 1983; Eisen, 1982; Emerson and Pedley, 1984; Emerson, Seyal and Pedley 1984; Luders, Dinner, Lesser et al., 1983; Luders, Lesser, Hahn et al., 1983; MacCabee, Pinkhasov and Cracco, 1983).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allison T., Wood C.C., McCarthy, G., Hume A.L. and Goff, W.R.: Short-latency somatosensory-evoked potentials in man, monkey, cat, and rat: Comparative latency analysis. In Courjon, J., Mauguiere, F., and Revol, M. (eds), Clinical Applications of Evoked Potentials in Neurology, pp. 303–310, Raven Press, New York, 1982.
Arezzo, J.C., Legatt, A.D. and Vaughan, H.G.: Topography and intracranial sources of somatosensory-evoked potentials in the monkey. I. Early components. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 46:155–172, 1979.
Arezzo, J.C. and Vaughan, H.G., Jr.: The contribution of afferent fiber tracts to the somatosensory-evoked potentials. In Bodis-Wollner (ed), Evoked Potentials, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 388:679–682, 1982.
Buchthal, F. and Rosenfalck, A.: Evoked action potentials and conduction velocity in human sensory nerves. Brain Res. 3:1–119, 1966.
Celesia, G.G.: Somatosensory-evoked potentials: A quest for relevance. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2:77–82, 1985.
Chiappa, K.H., Choi, S.K. and Young R.R.: Short-latency somatosensory-evoked potentials following median nerve stimulation in patients with neurological lesions. In Desmedt, J.E. (ed), Clinical Uses of Cerebral Brainstem and Spinal Somatosensory-evoked Potentials, Progress in Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 7, pp. 264–281, Karger, Basel, 1980.
Cracco, R.Q.: The initial positive potential of human scalp-recorded somatosensory-evoked response. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 32:623–629, 1972.
Cracco, R.Q and Cracco, J.B.: Somatosensory-evoked potential in man: far-field potentials. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 41:460–466, 1976.
Cunningham, K., Hallidy, A.M. and Jones, S.J.: Stationary peaks caused by abrupt changes in volume conductor dimensions: potential field modeling. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. (abstract) 61:S100, 1985.
Dawson, G.D. and Scott, J.W.: The recording of nerve action potentials through skin on man. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 12:259–267, 1949.
Desmedt, J.E. and Cheron, G.: Central somatosensory conduction in man: neural generators and interpeak latencies of the far-field components recorded from neck and right or left scalp and earlobes. Electroen-cephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 50:382–403, 1980.
Desmedt, J.E. and Cheron, 6.: Non-cephalic reference recording of early somatosensory potentials to finger stimulation in adult or aging normal man: differentiation of widespread N18 and contralateral N2O from preroladnic P22 and N30 components. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 52:553–570, 1981.
Desmedt, J.E. and Cheron, G.: Spinal and far-field components of human somatosensory-evoked potential to posterior tibial nerve stimulation analyzed with oesophageal derivations and non-cephalic reference recording. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 56:635–651, 1983.
Desmedt, J.E., Huy, N.T. and Carmeliet, J.: Unexpected latency shifts of the stationary P9 somatosensory-evoked potential far-field with changes in shoulder position. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 56:623–627, 1983.
Eisen, A.: The somatosensory-evoked potential. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 9:65–77, 1982.
Eisen, A., Odusote, K., Bozek, C. and Hoirch, M.: Far-field potentials from peripheral nerve: generated at sites of muscle mass change. Neurology 36:815–818, 1986.
Emerson, R.G. and Pedley, T.A.: Generator sources of median somatosensory-evoked potentials. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1:203–218, 1984.
Emerson, R.G., Seyal, M. and Pedley, T.A.: Somatosensory-evoked potentials following median nerve stimulation. I. The cervical components. Brain 107:169–182, 1984.
Frith, R.W., Benstead, T.B. and Daube, J.R.: The SEP standing waveform at the shoulder due to a change in volume conductor. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 61:S272, 1985.
Jewett, D.L.: Volume-conducted potentials in response to auditory stimuli as detected by averaging in the cat. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 28:609–618, 1970.
Jewett, D.L. and Williston, J.S.: Auditory-evoked far-fields averaged from the scalp of humans. Brain 94:681–696, 1971.
Jones, S.J.: Short latency potentials recorded from the neck and scalp following median stimulation in man. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 43:683–853, 1977.
Kakigi, R., Shibasaki, H., Hashizume, A. and Kuroiwa, Y.: Short latency somatosensory-evoked spinal and scalp-recorded potentials following posterior tibial nerve stimulation in man. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 53:602–611, 1982.
Kimura, J.: Field theory: the origin of stationary peaks from a moving source. In International Symposium on Somatosensory-Evoked Potentials, Rochester, MN, Custom Printing Inc., pp. 39–50, 1984.
Kimura, J. Kimura, A., Ishida, T., Kudo, Y., Suzuki, S., Machida, M. and Yamada, T.: What determines the latency and the amplitude of stationary peaks in far-field recordings? Ann. Neurol. 19:479–486, 1986.
Kimura, J., Mit sudome, A., Beck, D.O., Yamada, T. and Dickins, Q.S.: Field distribution of antidromically activated digital nerve potentials: model for far-field recording. Neurology 33:1164–1169, 1983.
Kimura, J., Mitsudome, A., Yamada, T. and Dickins, Q.S.: Stationary peaks from a moving source in far-field recording. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 58:351–361, 1984.
Kimura, J. and Yamada, T.: Short-latency somatosensory-evoked potentials following median nerve stimulation. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 388:689–694, 1982.
Kimura, J., Yamada, T., Shivapour, E. and Dickins, Q.S.: Neural pathways of somatosensory-evoked potentials: clinical implication. In Buser, P.A., Cobb, W.A. and Okuma, T. (eds), Kyoto Symposium (Electroencephalogr. Suppl. 36), Amsterdam, Elsevier, pp. 328–335, 1982.
Lin, J.T., Phillips, L.H. II, and Daube, J.R.: Far-field potentials recorded from peripheral nerves. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 50:174, 1980.
Lorente, de NO: A study of nerve physiology. Studies from the Rockefeller Institute 132:Chapt 16, 1947.
Luders, H., Andrish, J., Gurd, A., Weiker, G. and Klem, G.: Origin of far-field subcortical potentials evoked by stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 52:336–344, 1981.
Luders, H., Dinner, S.D., Lesser, R.P. and Klem, G.: Origin of far-field subcortical evoked potentials to posterior tibial and median nerve stimulation. Arch. Neurol. 40:93–97, 1983.
Luders, H., Lesser, R., Hahn, J., Little, J. and Klem, G.: Subcortical somatosensory-evoked potentials to median nerve stimulation. Brain 106, 341–372, 1983.
MacCabee, P.J., Pinkhasov, E.I. and Cracco, R.Q.: Short latency evoked potentials to median nerve stimulation: effect of low frequency filter. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 55:34–44, 1983.
Nakanishi, T.: Action potentials recorded by fluid electrodes. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 53:343–345, 1982.
Nakanishi, T.: Origin of action potential recorded by fluid electrodes. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 55:114–115, 1983.
Nakanishi, T. Tamaki, M., Arasaki, K. and Kudo, N.: Origins of the scalp-recorded somatosensory far-field potentials in man and cat. In Buser, P.A., Cobb, W.A. and Okuma, T. (eds), Kyoto Symposia, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., Suppl. no. 36, pp 336–348, 1982.
Noel, P. and Desmedt, J.E.: Cerebral and far-field somatosensory-evoked potentials in neurological disorders. In Desmedt, J.E. (ed), Clinical Use of Cerebral, Brainstem and Spinal Somatosensory-evoked Potentials, Progr. Clin. Neurophysiol. vol. 7, Karger, Basel, pp. 205, 230, 1980.
Sears, T.A.: Action potentials evoked in digital nerves by stimulation of mechanoreceptors in the human finger. J. Physiol. (London) 148:30–31, 1959.
Sohmer, H. and Feinmesser, M.: Cochlear and cortical audiometry conveniently recorded in the same subject. Israel J. Med. Sci. 6:219–223, 1970.
Stegeman, D., Van Oosteron, A. and Colon, E.: Stimulation of far-field stationary potentials due to changes in the volume conductor. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. (abstract) 61:S228, 1985.
Vaughan, H.G., Jr.: The neural origins of human event-related potentials. In Bodis-Wollner, I. (ed), Evoked Potentials, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 388:125–138, 1982.
Wiederholt, W.C. and Iragui-Madoz, V.J.: Far-field somatosensory potentials in the rat. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 42:456–465, 1977.
Wood, C.C. and Allison, T.: Interpretation of evoked potentials: a neurophysiological perspective. Can. J. Pyschol/Rev. 35(2):113–135, 1981.
Woodbury, J.W.: Potentials in a volume conductor. In Ruch, T.C. Patton, H.D., Woodbury, J.W. and Towe, A.L. (eds), Neurophysiology, Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders, pp. 85–91, 1965.
Yamada, T., Kimura, J. and Nitz, D.M.: Short latency somatosensory-evoked potentials following median nerve stimulation in man. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 48:367–376, 1980.
Yamada, T., Machida, M. and Kimura, J.: Far-field somatosensory-evoked potentials after stimulation of the tibial nerve in man. Neurology (New York) 32:1151–1158, 1982.
Yamada, T., Machida, M., Oishi, M., Kimura, A., Kimura, J., and Rodnitzky, R.L.: Stationary negative potentials near the source vs. positive far-field potentials at a distance. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 60:509–524, 1985.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kimura, J. (1990). Field Theory as it Pertains to Sep Analysis. In: Salzman, S.K. (eds) Neural Monitoring. Neurotrauma. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0491-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0491-6_1
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-6786-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-0491-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive