Advertisement

Aircraft Control for Flight in an Uncertain Environment: Takeoff in Windshear

  • G. Leitmann
  • S. Pandey
Part of the Progress in Systems and Control Theory book series (PSCT, volume 10)

Abstract

The design of the control of an aircraft encountering windshear after takeoff is treated as a problem of stabilizing the climb rate about a desired value of the climb rate. The resulting controller is a feedback one utilizing only climb rate information. Its robustness vis-a-vis windshear structure and intensity is illustrated via simulations employing four different windshear models.

Keywords

Vortex Pair Relative Angle Guidance Scheme Aircraft Control Aircraft Position 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    N.D. Botkin, M.A. Zarkh and V.S. Patsko, Numerical Solution of a Linear Differential Game, Proceed. Fourth Int’l. Symp. on Diff. Games and Appl., Helsinki, September 1990.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A.E. Bryson, Jr. and Y. Zhao, Feedback Control for Penetrating a Down-burst,Paper No. AIAA-87-2343, 1987.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Y.H. Chen and S. Pandey, Robust Control Strategy for Take-Off Perfor-mance in a Windshear, Optimal Control Applications and Methods, 10, 1989.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    W. Frost, Flight in a Low-Level Wind Shear, NASA CR 3678, 1983.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    W. Frost and D.W. Camp, Wind Shear Modeling for Aircraft Hazard Definition, FAA Report No. FAA-RD-77-36, U.S. Department of Transportation,Washington, DC, 1977.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    W.J. Grantham, G.G. Roetcisoender and E.K. Parks, A DFW Microburst Model based on AA-539 Data″ J. of Aircraft (to appear).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    V. Kaitala, G. Leitmann and S. Pandey, Robust Aircraft Take-Off Control:A Comparison of Aircraft Performance under Different Windshear Conditions,Proceed. Fourth Int’l. Symp. on diff. Games and Appl., Helsinki,September 1990.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. Leitmann, Deterministic Control of Uncertain Systems via a Constructive Use of Lyapunov Stability Theory, Proceed. 14th IIP Conf. on System Modeling and Optimization, Leipzig, July 1989.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. Leitmann and S. Pandey, Aircraft Control Under Conditions of Windshear, in Control and Dynamic Systems, 34, part 1 (ed. C.T. Leondes), Academic Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M.E. Long, The Mr-Safety Challenge‘’, National Geographic, 152, 2,August 1977.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Miele, T. Wang and W.W. Melvin, Guidance Strategies for Near Optimum Take-Off Performance in a Windshear, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 50, No. 1, 1986.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Miele, T. Wang, W.W. Melvin and R.L. Bowles, Maximum Survival Capability of an Aircraft in a Severe Windshear, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 53, No. 2, 1987.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Miele, T. Wang, W.W. Melvin and R.L. Bowles, Gamma Guidance Schemes for Flight in a Windshear, Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 11 No. 4, 1987.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. Miele, T. Wang, C.Y. Tzeng and W.W. Melvin, Optimization and Guidance of Abort Landing Trajectories in a Windshear, Paper No. AIAA-87-2341, AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, 1987.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Miele, T. Wang, H. Wang and W.W. Melvin, Overview of Optimal Trajectories for Flight in Windshear, in Control and Dynamic Systems, 34, part 1, (ed. C.T. Leondes), Academic Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. Zhu and B. Etkin, Fluid Dynamic Model of a Dawnburst, Institute of Aerospace Studies, University of Toronto, UTIAS Report No. 271.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Leitmann
  • S. Pandey

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations