Advertisement

Resentment and the Rights of the Elderly

  • Albert R. Jonsen
Chapter
Part of the Contemporary Issues in Biomedicine, Ethics, and Society book series (CIBES)

Abstract

A vigorous debate now rages over the distribution of health care resources in the United States. The place of the elderly in this distribution is hotly contested, not only in the academic discussions, but in the political arena. On the academic side, the problem is framed as a debate over theories of distributive justice; in the political forum, the voice of the voters exerts a power more than theoretical. This chapter suggests a link between the two. A hint of that link appears in a curious passage penned by philosopher David Hume in hisEnquiry Concerning Principles of Morals:

Were there a species of creature intermingled with men which, though rational, were possessed of such inferior strength, both of body and mind, that they were incapable of all resistance and could never, upon the highest provocation, make us feel the effects of their resentment: the necessary consequence, I think, is that we should be bound by the laws of humanity to give gentle usage to these creatures, but should not, properly speaking, lie under any restraint of justice with regard to them.’

Keywords

Social Institution Distributive Justice Social Arrangement Vigorous Debate Personal Worth 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    D. Hume (1965) Enquiry in Hume ‘s Ethical Writings(A. Maclntyre, ed.), Collier-Macmillan, London, UK, III, i. p. 41.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hume, EnquiryHume’s Ethical Writings. Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Maclntyre (1988)Whose Justice? Which Rationality?University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN, p. 295.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hume (1888)Treatise of Human Nature (L. A. Selby-Bigge, ed.)The Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, II, iii, p. 423.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Scheler (1961)Ressentiment (L. A. Coser, ed.)The Free Press, New York, NY, pp. 39,40.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Scheler (1973)Formalism in Ethics and the Non-Formal Ethic of ValuesNorthwestern University Press, Evanston, IL, p. 231.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    SCheler(1961), pp. 62,63.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Scheler (1961), p. 50.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Scheler (1961), p. 63.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aristotle (1962) Nicomachean Ethics, V, ii, 1130b, (M. Ostwald, ed.), Bobbs-Merrill Company, Indianapolis, IN, p. 117.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Walzer (1983)Spheres of Justice, Basic Books, New York, NY, p. 260.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    ShakespeareHenry NPart I, V, i.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Montaigne (1958)Essays (J. M. Cohen, trans.), Penguin Books, London, UK, III, ii, pp. 249,250.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Albert R. Jonsen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations