Skip to main content

Hard Cases Make Bad Law

The Legacy of the Baby Doe Controversy

  • Chapter
Compelled Compassion

Part of the book series: Contemporary Issues in Biomedicine, Ethics, and Society ((CIBES))

Abstract

Many years have passed since the heated controversy flared over the wisdom of the federal government enacting the so-called “Baby Doe” regulations for the care of newborns. These regulations, originally promulgated in March 1983 by the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), required the posting of warning notices in neonatal nurseries concerning the duty to treat handicapped newborns and called for the creation of federal “flying squads” of medical investigators to rush to hospitals where discrimination in treatment had been alleged (DHHS, 1983). These regulations, or more accurately, a modified version of them issued on January 12, 1984, were eventually held to be unconstitutional by the United States Supreme Court in a 1986 decision, Bowen v. Am. Hosp. Ass’n.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andrusko, D. (1991) NRL News.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asch, A. and Fine, M., eds. (1988) Moving disability beyond stigma. J. Soc. Issues 44, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bay, B. and Burgess, M. (1991) A survey of Calgary pediatricians’ attitudes regarding the treatment of defective newborns. Bioethics 5(2), 139–149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brahams, D. and Brahams, M. (1983) The Arthur case—A proposal for legislation. J. Med. Ethics 9, 12–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, A. (1984) Is it a life? The Nation 238(2), 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, A. (1987) Imperiled newborns. Hastings Cent. Rep. 17:6, 15–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, A. (1989) Moral experts and moral expertise. inThe Nature of Clinical Ethics, B. Hoffmaster, B. Freedman and G. Fraser, Eds., Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, 59–88.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, A. and Cullinane, M. (1972) Families under stress. Postgrad. Med. 21,223–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) (1983) Nondis-crimination on the basis of handicap. 48 Fed. Reg., 9630–9632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) (1985) Child abuse and neglect prevention and treatment program, and services and treatment for disabled infants: Model guidelines for health care providers to establish Infant Care Review Committees. 50 Fed. Reg., 14878–14901.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duff, R. and Campbell, A. (1973) Moral and ethical dilemmas in the special-care nursery. N. Engl. J. Med. 289, 890–894.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fost, N. (1992) Infant Care Review Committees, this vol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerry, M. (1985) The civil rights of handicapped infants. Issues Law Med. 1,15–66.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guillemin, J. and Holmstrom, L. (1987) Mixed Blessings (Oxford, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeister, B., Freedman, B., and Fraser, G., eds. (1989) Clinical Ethics: Theory and Practice (Humana, Clifton, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Koop, C.E. (1991) Personal communication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopelman L., Irons, T., and Kopelman, A. (1988) Neonatologists judge the `Baby Doe“ regulations. N. Engl. J. Med. 318, 677–683.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lorber, J. (1972) Spina bifida cystica — results of treatment of 270 consecutive cases with criteria for selection for the future. Arch. Dis. Child. 47, 854–873.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, T. and Caplan, A., eds. (1985) Which Babies Shall Live? (Humana, Clifton, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nimz, M. (1989) How protected are infants with disabilities?, in The Triumph of Hope (Andrusko, D., ed.), NRL, Washington, pp. 145–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, T. and Hecimovic, A. (1985) Baby Doe and the search for a quality of life. Exceptional Children 6, 15–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoden, N. (1986) Treating Baby Doe: The ethics of uncertainty. Hastings Cent. Rep. 16, 34–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoden, N. and Arras, J. (1985) Withholding treatment from Baby Doe: From discrimination to child abuse. Milbank Memorial Fund Q. 63, 18–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weir, R. (1984) Selective nontreatment of handicapped newborns (Oxford, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir, R. and Bale, J. (1989) Selective nontreatment of neurologically impaired neonates. Neurol. Clin. 7(4), 807–820.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie, J. (1991) Personal communication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, E. and Stevenson, D. (1990) Limiting treatment for extremely premature low-birth weight infants. AJDC 144, 549–552.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Caplan, A.L. (1992). Hard Cases Make Bad Law. In: Caplan, A.L., Blank, R.H., Merrick, J.C. (eds) Compelled Compassion. Contemporary Issues in Biomedicine, Ethics, and Society. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0409-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0409-1_4

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-6749-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-0409-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics