Advertisement

Peer Support Groups for Women in Treatment and Aftercare

  • Lisa Roth
  • Patricia James
Part of the Drug and Alcohol Abuse Reviews book series (DAAR, volume 5)

Abstract

Substance abuse among women has traditionally received less attention and treatment dollars than chemical dependence among men. This is owing to the social stigma attached to women’s drug abuse, the hidden nature of much female substance abuse, and the comparatively fewer numbers of female substance abusers. However, in the early 1970s recognition of the magnitude of the problem of substance abuse among women began to increase as the women’s movement drew attention to women’s unmet needs in many areas. Unfortunately, at the same time the number of chemically dependent women also began to rise. There is also evidence that the problems of chemically dependent women have increased in complexity and severity in the past 20 yr.1The pattern of drug usage by women also changed from licit drugs, primarily prescription medications and alcohol, to illicit “hard” drugs.1 The epidemic of crack cocaine usage among urban women of childbearing age, which began in the late 1980s, is perhaps the most visible evidence of this trend.

Keywords

Substance Abuse Treatment Battered Woman Alcoholic Anonymous Female Substance Abuser Peer Support Group 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    P. A. Harrison (1989) Women in treatment: Changing over time. Int. J. Addict. 24, 655–673.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Gutierres, R. Jonathan, and D. L. Rhoades (1981) Women and drugs: Use and abuse. Unpublished paper, CODAMA Services, Inc., Phoenix, AZ.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. J. Furst, L. J. Beckman, C. Y. Nakamura, and M. Weiss (1981) Utilization of Alcoholism Treatment Services. Report prepared for the State of California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs, University of California at Los Angeles Alcohol Research Center.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Stevens, N. Arbiter, and P. Glider (1989) Women residents: Expanding their role to increase treatment effectiveness in substance abuse programs. Int. J. Addict. 24, 425–434.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. G. Reed (1987) Developing women-sensitive drug dependence treatment services: Why so difficult?. J. Psychoactive Drugs 19, 151–164.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    C. Lubinski (1991) Advocacy: Prevention strategies and treatment services sensitive to women’s needs, in Alcohol and Drugs are Women’s Issues, vol. 1. P. Roth, ed. Women’s Action Alliance and Scarecrow Press, Metuchen, NJ, pp. 178–182.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. J. Beckman and H. Amaro (1984/5) Patterns of women’s use of alcohol treatment agencies. Alcohol Health Res. World 9, 15–25.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.C. Marsh and N. A. Miller (1985) Female clients in substance abuse treatment. Int. J. Addict. 20, 995–1019.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. B. Sutker (1982) Drug dependent women: An overview of the literature, in Treatment Services for Drug Dependent Women, vol. 1. G. M. Beschner, B. G. Reed, and J. Mondanaro, eds. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD, pp. 25–51.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. Doshan and C. Bursch (1982) Women and substance abuse: Critical issues in treatment. J. Drug Educ. 12, 229–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    L. P. Finnegan (1980) Women in treatment, in Handbook on Drug Abuse. R. L. DuPont, A. Goldstein, and J. O’Donnell, eds. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD, pp. 121–131.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. B. Tucker (1979) A descriptive and comparative analysis of the social support structure of heroin-addicted women, in Addicted Women: Family Dynamics, Self Perceptions, and Support Systems. B. G. Reed, E. Leibson, and E. Donovan, eds. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD, pp. 37–76.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    L. F. Kurtz (1990) The self-help movement: review of the past decade of research. Soc. Work Groups 13, 101–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    B. S. Brown and R. S. Ashery (1979) Aftercare in drug abuse programming, in Handbook on Drug Abuse. R. L. DuPont, A. Goldstein, and J. O’Donnell, eds. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD, pp. 165–173.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Wedenoja and B. G. Reed (1982) Women’s groups as a form of intervention for drug dependent women, in Treatment Services for Drug Dependent Women, vol. 2. B. G. Reed, G. M. Beschner, and J. Mondanaro, eds. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD, pp. 62–136.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. L. DenHartog, A. L. Homer, and R. B. Wilson (1986) Cooperation: A Tradition in Action. Self-Help Involvement of Clients in Missouri Alcohol and Drug Abuse Treatment Programs. Missouri Department of Mental Health, Jefferson City, MO.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    D. L. Rhoades (1983) A longitudinal study of life stress and social support among drug abusers. Int. J. Addict. 18, 195–222.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    B. G. Reed (1982) Intervention strategies for drug dependent women: An introduction, in Treatment Services for Drug Dependent Women, vol. 1. G. M. Beschner, B. G. Reed, and J. Mondanaro, eds. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    B. Haver (1987) Female alcoholics: IV. The relationship between family violence and outcome 3–10 years after treatment. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 75, 449–455.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    P. Y. Martin and K. A. Shanahan (1983) Transcending the effects of sex composition in small groups, in Groupwork with Women/Groupwork with Men. B. G. Reed and C. G. Garvin, eds. Haworth, New York, pp. 19–32.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    R. M. Kanter (1977a) Men and Women of the Corporation. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    R. M. Kanter (1977b) Some effects of proportions in group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. Am. J. Sociol. 82, 965–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    B. G. Reed and E. Leibson (1981) Women clients in special women’s demonstration drug abuse treatment programs compared with women entering selected co-sex programs. Int. J. Addict. 16, 1425–1466.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    N. Naierman, B. Savage, B. Haskins, J. Lear, H. Chase, K. Marvelle, and R. Lamothe (1979) An Assessment of Sex Discrimination in the Delivery of Health Development services. Final report to the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Civil Rights (ABT Associates), Contract HEW-100–78--137.S.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    I. D. Yalom (1985) The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy. Basic, New York, pp. 486–514.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    P. Antze (1979) Role of ideologies in peer psychotherapy groups, in Self-Help Groups for Coping with Crisis. M. A. Lieberman and L. D. Bordman, eds. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 272–304.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    P. R. Balgopal and T. V. Vassil (1983) Group work: historical overview and current status. Groups in Social Work-An Ecological Perspective, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    A. H. Katz and E. I. Bender (1976) Self-help groups in western society: history and prospects. J. Appl. Behay. Sci. 12, 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    M. Levine (1988) How self-help works. Am. J. Community Psychol. 16, 167–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    M. A. Lieberman and G. R. Bond (1978) Self-help groups-problems in measuring outcome. Small Group Behay. 9, 221–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    L. Maguire (1983) Understanding Social Networks. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    P. Rosenberg (1984) Support groups-a special therapeutic entity. Small Group Behay. 15, 173–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    L. Shulman (1986) The dynamics of mutual aid. Soc. Work Groups 8, 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    P. R. Balgopal, P. H. Ephross, and T. V. Vassil (1986) Self-help groups and professional helpers. Small Group Behay. 17, 123–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    S. S. Covington (1991) Sororities of helping and healing: women and mutual help groups in Alcohol and Drugs are Women’s Issues, vol. 1. P. Roth, ed. Women’s Action Alliance and Scarecrow Press, Metuchen, NJ, pp. 85–92.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    L. F. Kurtz and T. J. Powell (1987) Three approaches to understanding self-help groups. Soc. Work Groups 10, 69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    G. S. Leventhal, K. I. Maton, and E. J. Madara (1988) Systemic organization support for self-help groups. Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 58, 592–603.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    P. Petrakis (1988) Research report of the surgeon general’s workshop on self-help and public health. Soc. Policy 11, 36–38.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    B. Gottlieb (1983) Social networks and social support: an overview of research, practice and policy implications. Health Educ. Q. 12, 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    S. Hartman (1983) A self-help group for women in abusive relationships. Soc. Work Groups 6, 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    P. Cooper-White (1990) Peer vs clinical counseling-is there a place for both in the battered women’s movement? Response 13, 2–6.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    M. Habib and B. J. Landgraf (1977) Women helping women. Soc. Work 22, 510–512.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    S. Xenarios (1988) Sounds of practice I: group work with rape survivors. Soc. Work Groups 11, 95–101.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    A. J. Gordon and M. Zrull (1991) Social networks and recovery: one year after inpatient treatment. J. Subst. Abuse Treatment 8, 143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    K. Humphreys, B. Mavis, and B. Stofflemayr (1991) Factors predicting attendance at self-help groups after substance abuse treatment: preliminary findings. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 59, 591–593.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    G. DeLeon (1991) Aftercare in therapeutic communities. Int. J. Addict. 25, 1225–1237.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    R. F. Catalano and J. D. Hawkins (1985) Project skills: preliminary results from a theoretically based aftercare experiment. Natl. Inst. Drug Abuse Res. Monogr. Ser. 58, 157–181.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    G. B. Ladwig and M. D. Andersen (1989) Substance abuse in women: Relationship between chemical dependency of women and past reports of physical and/or sexual abuse. Int. J. Addict. 24, 739–754.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    B. L. Underhill (1986) Issues relevant to aftercare programs for women. Alcohol Health Res. World 11, 46–47.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    W E. McAuliffe and J. M. N. Ch’ien (1986) Recovery training and self help: a relapse-prevention program for treated opiate addicts. J. Subst. Abuse Treatment 3, 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    A. M. Washton (1988) Preventing relapse to cocaine. J. Clin. Psychiatry 49, 34–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    H. D. Weiner, M. C. Wallen, and G. L. Zankowski (1990) Culture and social class as intervening variables in relapse prevention with chemically dependent women. J. Psychoactive Drugs 22, 239–248.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    B. E. Havassy, S. M. Hall, and D. M. Wasserman (1990) Relapse to cocaine use following treatment: Preliminary findings on the role of social support, in Problems of Drug Dependence 1990: Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Scientific Meeting. L. Harris, ed. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD, pp. 502–503.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    D. Mumme’ (1991) Aftercare: Its role in primary and secondary recovery of women from alcohol and other drug dependence. Int. J. Addict. 26, 549–564.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lisa Roth
  • Patricia James

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations