Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Progress in Mathematics ((PM,volume 126))

  • 384 Accesses

Abstract

There are only very few proved results concerning the distribution of primes in short intervals. The prime number theorem tells us that the average density of primes around x is approximately 1/ln x. This means that if we consider an interval of length Δx about x and choose any integer t in this interval, then the probability of t being a prime will approach 1/ln x as x → ∞, if Δx is small compared to x. This implies that the primes tend to thin out as x grows larger; an implication that becomes obvious when considering that the condition for a randomly picked integer x to be composite is that it has some prime factor \( \leqslant \sqrt {{x,}} \), and that there are more prime factors \( \leqslant \sqrt {x} \) to choose from when x is larger.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Daniel Shanks and John W. Wrench, Jr., “Brun’s Constant,” Math. Comp. 28 (1974) pp. 293–299.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. B. K. Parady, Joel F. Smith, and Sergio E. Zarantonello, “Largest Known Twin Primes,” Math. Comp. 55 (1990) pp. 381–382.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. G. H. Hardy and J. E. Littlewood, “Some Problems of ‘Partitio Numerorum’ III: On the Expression of a Number as a Sum of Primes,” Acta Math. 44 (1922) pp. 1–70 =Coll. Papers, vol. 1,(1922) pp. 561–630.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. F. J. Gruenberger and G. Armerding, Statistics on the First Six Million Prime Numbers, Reviewed in Math. Comp. 19 (1965) pp. 503–505.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hans Riesel and Robert. C. Vaughan, “On Sums of Primes,” Arkiv fr Mat. 21 (1983) pp. 45–74.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. G. H. Hardy and E. M. Wright, An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers, Fifth edition, Oxford, 1979, p. 351.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Richard P. Brent, “The Distribution of Small Gaps Between Successive Primes,” Math. Comp. 28 (1974) pp. 315–324.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Ian Richards, “On the Incompatibility of Two Conjectures Concerning Primes,” Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 80 (1974) pp. 419–438.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Thomas Vehka, “Explicit Construction of an Admissible Set for the Conjecture that Sometimes π(x + y) > π(y) + π(x),” Notices Am. Math. Soc. 26 (1979) p. A-453.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hans Riesel, “Primes Forming Arithmetic Series and Clusters of Large Primes,” Nordisk Tidskrift för Informationsbehandling (BIT) 10 (1970) pp. 333–342.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. J. E. Littlewood, “Sur la Distribution des Nombres Premiers,” Comptes Rendus 158 (1914) pp. 1869–1872.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Carter Bays and Richard H. Hudson, “On the Fluctuations of Littlewood for Primes of the Form 4n ± 1,” Math. Comp. 32 (1978) pp. 281–286.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. William Feller, An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications, vol. I, 2nd edition, Wiley, New York, 1957, pp. 73–87.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Carter Bays and Richard H. Hudson, “Details of the First Region of Integers x with π3,2(x) < π3,1(x),” Math. Comp. 32 (1978) pp. 571–576.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Daniel Shanks, “On Maximal Gaps Between Successive Primes,” Math. Comp. 18 (1964) pp. 646–651.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. L. J. Lander and T. R. Parkin, “On the First Appearance of Prime Differences,” Math. Comp. 21 (1967) pp. 483–488.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Richard P. Brent, “The First Occurrence of Large Gaps Between Successive Primes,” Math. Comp. 27 (1973) pp. 959–963.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Richard P. Brent, “The First Occurrence of Certain Large Prime Gaps,” Math. Comp. 35 (1980) pp. 1435–1436.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Jeff Young and Aaron Potler, “First Occurrence Prime Gaps, Math. Comp. 52 (1989) pp. 221–224.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Harald Cramér, “On the Order of Magnitude of the Difference Between Consecutive Prime Numbers,” Acta Arith. 2 (1936) pp. 23–46.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Riesel, H. (1994). Subtleties in the Distribution of Primes. In: Prime Numbers and Computer Methods for Factorization. Progress in Mathematics, vol 126. Birkhäuser, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0251-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0251-6_3

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-6681-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-0251-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics