Homogeneous Rigid Body Mechanics with Elastic Coupling
Geometric algebra is used in an essential way to provide a coordinate-free approach to Euclidean geometry and rigid body mechanics that fully integrates rotational and translational dynamics. Euclidean points are given a homogeneous representation that avoids designating one of them as an origin of coordinates and enables direct computation of geometric relations. Finite displacements of rigid bodies are associated naturally with screw displacements generated by bivectors and represented by twistors that combine multiplicatively. Classical screw theory is incorporated in an invariant formulation that is less ambiguous, easier to interpret geometrically, and manifestly more efficient in symbolic computation. The potential energy of an arbitrary elastic coupling is given an invariant form that promises significant simplifications in practical applications.
KeywordsRigid Body Euclidean Geometry Geometric Algebra Homogeneous Method Elastic Coupling
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Brockett, R. and J. Loncaric (1986). The geometry of compliance programming. In C. Byrnes and A. Lindquist (eds.),Theory and Applications of Nonlinear Control Systems, North Holland, pp. 35–42.Google Scholar
- Ciblak, N. and H. Lipkin (1998). Synthesis of stiffnesses by springs. InProc. ASME Design Engineering Technical ConI., Number DETC98-MECH-5879, CD-ROM.Google Scholar
- Fasse, E. (2000, July 9–12). Some applications of screw theory to lumped parameter modeling of visco-elastically coupled rigid bodies. InProc. of A Symposium Commemorating the Legacy, Works, and Life of Sir Robert Stawell Ball (Ball 2000), Cambridge University, Trinity College.Google Scholar
- Fasse, E. (2002). Application of screw theory to lumped parameter modelling of elastically coupled rigid bodies,J. of Mechanical Engineering Science, Part C, in press.Google Scholar
- Fasse, E. and S. Zhang (1999). Lumped-parameter modelling of spatial compliance using a twist-based potential function. InProc. of the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Dividion, Vol. 15, pp. 779–786.Google Scholar
- Fasse, E., S. Zhang and A. Arabyan (2000). Modelling of elastically coupled bodies using a twist-based potential function.ASME J. of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, submitted for publication.Google Scholar
- Hestenes, D. (1966).Space-Time Algebra, Gordon & Breach, New York.Google Scholar
- Hestenes, D. (2001). Old Wine in New Bottles: A new algebraic framework for computational geometry. In E. Bayro-Corrochano & G. Sobczyk (eds.),Advances in Geometric Algebra with Applications in Science and Engineering, Birkhäuser, Boston, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
- Loncarić, J. (1987). Normal forms of stiffness and compliance matrices,IEEE Trans, on Robotics and Automation 9, 567–572.Google Scholar
- Maschke, B. (1996). Elements on the modelling of mechanical systems. In C. Melchiorri and A. Tomambé (eds.),Modelling and Control of Mechanisms and Robots, World Scientific Publishing, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
- Zefran, M. and V. Kumar (1999). A geometric approach to the study of the Cartesian stiffness matrix,ASME J. of Mechanical Design, accepted for publication.Google Scholar