Skip to main content

System Identification: A Learning Theory Approach

  • Chapter
  • 395 Accesses

Part of the book series: Trends in Mathematics ((TM))

Abstract

In this paper, the problem of system identification is formulated as a problem in statistical learning theory. It is shown that if a particular type of uniform convergence result holds, then the traditional approach of choosing the current model to minimize the error on the observed data will eventually converge to an optimal model within the specified class. More important, the reformulation of system identification as a learning theory problem leads tofinite time estimatesfor the rate at which the estimated model converges to the optimal model. As an illustration of the approach, a result is derived showing that in the case of exponentially stable systems with fading memory, the desired uniform convergence result holds, so that the learning theory approach is applicable,providede the adjustable parameters enter the system model in a linear fashion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. P. E. Caines, “Prediction error identification methods for stationary stochastic processes,”IEEE Trans.Autom. Controlvol. AC-21, no. 4, pp. 500–505, Aug. 1976.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. P. E. Caines, “Stationary linear and nonlinear system identification and predictor set completeness,”IEEE Trans.Autom. Controlvol. AC-23, no. 4, pp. 583–594, Aug. 1978.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. M. C. Campi and E. Weyer, “Finite sample properties of system identification methods,”IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. AC-47no. 8, pp. 1329–1334, Aug. 2002.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. D. Haussier, “Decision theoretic generalizations of the PAC model for neural net and other learning applications,”Information and Computation, vol. 100 pp.78–150, 1992.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. L. Ljung, “Convergence analysis of parametric identification methods,”IEEE Trans. Autom. Control vol. AC-23no. 5, pp. 770–783, Oct. 1978.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. L. LjungSystem Identification: Theory for the User.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. LjungSystem Identification: Theory for the User2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  8. V. N. Vapnik and A. Ya. Chervonenkis, “On the uniform convergence of relative frequencies to their probabilities,”Theory of Probab. Appl.vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 264–280, 1971.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. V. N. Vapnik and A. Ya. Chervonenkis, “Necessary and sufficient conditions for the uniform convergence of means to their expectations,”Theory of Probab. Appl. vol.26, no. 3, pp. 532–553, 1981.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. M. VidyasagarA Theory of Learning and Generalization. London, UK: Springer-Verlag, 1997.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Vidyasagar and R. L. Karandikar, “A learning theory approach to system identification and stochastic adaptive control,” presented atthe IFAC Workshop on Adaptation and Learning in Control and Signal ProcessingComo, ItalyAug.2001.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Vidyasagar and R. L. Karandikar, “System identification: A learning theory approach,” inProceedings of the 1 Oth IEEE Conference on Decision and ControlOrlando, FL, Dec. 2001, pp. 2001–2006.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Vidyasagar and R. L. Karandikar, “A learning theory approach to system identification and stochastic adaptive control,” inProceedings of the 15th IFAC World CongressBarcelona, Spain, July 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Vidyasagar and H. Kimura, “Robust controllers for uncertain multivariable linear systems,”Automatica vol.22, no. 1, pp. 85–94January1986.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. E. Weyer, “Finite sample properties of system identification of ARX models under mixing conditions,”Automaticavol. 36, no. 9, pp. 1291–1299, Sept. 2000.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vidyasagar, M., Karandikar, R.L. (2003). System Identification: A Learning Theory Approach. In: Hashimoto, K., Oishi, Y., Yamamoto, Y. (eds) Control and Modeling of Complex Systems. Trends in Mathematics. Birkhäuser, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0023-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0023-9_6

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-6577-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-0023-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics