Advertisement

Collaborative Creation in Interactive Theatre

  • Andrew Johnston
  • Andrew Bluff
Chapter
Part of the Springer Series on Cultural Computing book series (SSCC)

Abstract

This article describes the collaboration between two digital artist/researchers from the Creativity and Cognition Studios at the University of Technology Sydney and the Australian based physical theatre company, Stalker Theatre. This collaboration has been under way since 2011 and has resulted in the creation of five major works that have toured internationally.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Our thanks go to the entire Dot and the Kangaroo team for such a constructive and enjoyable collaboration: David Clarkson, Lee-Anne Litton, Rick Everett, Ursula Yovich, Kate Hosking, Jordan O’Davies, Boris Bagattini, Margie Breen, Annemaree Dalziel, Alejandro Rolandi, Peter Kennard, Katherine Budd, Cristabel Sved, John Rommel, Ross Graham and Dean Walsh.

References

  1. Akrich M (1992) The description of technical objects, in shaping technology/building society: studies in sociotechnical change (inside technology). The MIT Press, USAGoogle Scholar
  2. Bluff A, Johnston A (2017a) Creature: interactions: a social mixed-reality playspace. Leonardo 50(4):360–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bluff A, Johnston A (2017b) Storytelling with interactive physical theatre: a case study of dot and the kangaroo. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on movement computingGoogle Scholar
  4. Creativity and Cognition Studios (2017) www.creativityandcognition.com
  5. Hummels C, Overbeeke K, Klooster S (2007) Move to get moved: a search for methods, tools and knowledge to design for expressive and rich movement-based interaction. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 11(8):677–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Janis IL (1971) Groupthink. Psychol Today 5(6):43–46Google Scholar
  7. Johnston AJ (2015) Conceptualising interaction in live performance: reflections on ‘encoded’. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on movement and computingGoogle Scholar
  8. Latour B (2005) Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Latour B, Porter C (1996) Aramis, or, the love of technology. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Latulipe C, Wilson D, Huskey S, Gonzalez B, Word M (2011) Temporal integration of interactive technology in dance: creative process impacts. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on creativity and cognition, ACMGoogle Scholar
  11. Pedley E (1929) Dot and the kangaroo. Angus & Robertson, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  12. Stalker Theatre (2017) www.stalker.com.au
  13. Steinheider B, Legrady G (2004) Interdisciplinary collaboration in digital media arts: a psychological perspective on the production process. Leonardo 37(4):315–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Turner G, Edmonds E, Weakley A (2005) Seeing eye-to-eye: supportive transdisciplinary environments for interactive art. In: Proceedings of ninth international conference on information visualisation, IEEEGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew Johnston
    • 1
  • Andrew Bluff
    • 1
  1. 1.SydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations