Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Health Informatics ((HI))

  • 2319 Accesses

Abstract

Some of the earliest applications of computers in clinical medicine were in the clinical subspecialties, including cardiology, pulmonary, nephrology, gastroenterology, pediatrics, and the surgical sciences. But health professionals found these prototypes difficult to use; data entry devices were awkward and inefficient, and order entry functions were often not integrated. Each information system for a clinical subspecialty (ISCS) evolved differently, with its own specialized functional and technical requirements. In the 1960s mainframe computers were limited in their ability to meet all the processing requirements of all the ICSCs in a large hospital. By the 1970s each ISCS could have its own minicomputer-based system linked directly to the central mainframe. Health care professionals used terminals connected to the central computer to enter orders and to receive test results; the central computer transferred the orders to the appropriate ISCS subsystems and integrated the data coming back from the ISCSs into the patients’ records stored in the mainframe computer. In the 1980s local area networks linked multiple lower-cost minicomputers; with distributed minicomputers and interactive visual display terminals, clinicians could begin to benefit from the ISCSs in direct patient care and each ISCS could develop its own system to meet its own requirements. In the 1990s distributed information systems allowed physicians to enter orders and retrieve test results using clinical workstations connected to client-server minicomputers in the local area network that linked the entire hospital, and patient data from all of the distributed ISCS databases were integrated in a computer-based patient record.

Author was deceased at the time of publication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alderman EI, Spitz AL, Sanders WJ, Harrison DC. A cardiologist’s evaluation of a computer cardiac catheterization system. In: Cox J, editor. Computers in cardiology. Long Beach: IEEE Computer Society; 1974. p. 81–3.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Angle HV, Ellinwood EH. A psychiatric assessment-treatment-outcome information system: evaluation with computer simulation. Proc SCAMC. 1978;149–59.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ausman RK, Baer GD. Machine processing of the operative record. Proc 6th IBM Med Symp. 1964;553–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ausman RK, Moore GE, Grace JT. An automated operative record system. Ann Surg. 1965;162:402.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Austin H, Laufman H, Zelner L. Strategic automation for surgery. Comput Healthc. 1987;8:44–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ball MJ. Computers-prescription for hospital ills. Datamation. 1975;21:50–1.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ball MJ, Douglas JV, Warnock-Matheron A, Hannah KJ. The case for using computers in the operating room. West J Med. 1986;145:843.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Banta HD, Thacker SB. Costs and benefits of electronic fetal monitoring: a review of the literature. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Services Research; 1979a.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Banta HD, Thacker SB. Policies toward medical technology: the case of electronic fetal monitoring. AJPH. 1979;69:931–5.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Barnoon S, Wolfe H. Scheduling a multiple operating room system: a simulation approach. Health Serv Res. 1968;3:272–85.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Beckett PGS. Computers and clinical psychiatry. Med Electron IRE Trans. 1960;ME-7:248–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Beggs S, Vallbona C, Spencer WA, Jacobs FM, Baker RL. Evaluation of a system for on-line computer scheduling of patient care activities. Comput Biomed Res. 1971;4:634–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Berg CM, Larson D. Operating room systems software. In: Ball MJ, Hannah KJ, Gerdin Jelger U, Peterson H, editors. Nursing informatics: where caring and technology meet. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1988. p. 146–59.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Biesada AM. Tooth Tech. The new dentistry. High Technol Bus. 1989(April);28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Black GC, Saveanu TI. A search for mental health output measures. Proc SCAMC. 1980b;3:1859–71.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bleich H. Computer evaluation of acid-based disorders. J Clin Invest. 1969;48:1689–96.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bleich HL. The computer as a consultant. N Engl J Med. 1971;284:141–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Blose WF, Vallbona C, Spencer WA. System for processing clinical research data. II. System design. Proc 6th IBM symposium. Poughkeepsie: IBM; 1964. p. 463–85.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Blum BI, Lenhard RE J, McColligan EE. An integrated data model for patient care. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1985;32:277–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Blum B, Lenhard Jr R. A clinical information display system. Proc SCAMC. 1977;131–8.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Blum BI, Orthner HE. The MUMPS programming language. In: Helmuth HF, Blum BI, editors. Implementing health care information systems. New York: Springer; 1989. p. 396–420.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Blum BI. Clinical information systems. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1986.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Blum BI. An information system for developing information systems. AFIPS Natl Comput Conf Proc. 1983;52:743–52.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Blum RL. Automating the study of clinical hypotheses on a time-oriented clinical database: The Rx Project. Proc MEDINFO. 1980:456–60.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Blum RL. Automating the study of clinical hypotheses on a time-oriented data base: the RX project. Proc MEDINFO. 1979;456–60.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Brame RG, Hammond WE, Stead WW. The computerized obstetrical record of Duke University. J Clin Comput. 1974;4:107–20.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Brown A. A computer generated aid for scheduling operating rooms. Proc AAMSI Congress. 1984;259–99.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Budd JR, Warwick WJ, Wielinski CL, Finkelstein SM. A medical information relational database system (MIRDS). Comp Biomed Res. 1988;21:419–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Budetti P, Barrand N, McManus P, Heinen LA. The costs and effectiveness of neonatal intensive care. Darby: Diane Publishing; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Burgess CJ, Swigger KM. A data collection system for use by psychiatric patients. Proc SCAMC. 1984;286–9.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Burstein E. Use of a microcomputer system for administration and evaluation of psychological testing: the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI). Proc SCAMC. 1980;1872–80.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Chodoff P, Gianaris II C. A nurse-computer assisted preoperative anesthesia management system. Comp Biomed Res. 1973;6:371–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Clark JS, Veasy LG, Jung AL, Jenkins JL. Automated PO2, PCO2, AND PH monitoring of infants. Comp Biomed Res. 1971;4:262–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Clayton PD, Urie PM, Marshall HW, Warner HR. A computerized system for the cardiovascular laboratory. In: Cox JR, Hugenholt, editors. Computers in cardiology. Long Beach: IEEE Computing Society; 1974. p. 89–93.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Coffman GA, Mezzich JE. Research use of a general psychiatric data base. Proc SCAMC. 1983;721–3.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Collen MF. A history of medical informatics in the United States, 1950 to 1990. Indianapolis: American Medical Informatics Association; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Collen MF. General requirements for clinical departmental systems. Proc MEDINFO. 1983;83–9.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Collen MF. General requirements of a medical information (MIS). Comput Biomed Res. 1970;3:393–406.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Colligan RC, Offord KP. Revitalizing the MMPI: the development of contemporary norms. Psychiatr Ann. 1985;15:558–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Congleton MW, Glogower FD, Ramsey-Klee D, Roberts AS. Navy Mental Health Information System (NAMHIS): a psychiatric application of COSTAR. Proc SCAMC. 1984;437–40.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Connelly D, Dean DW, Hultman BK. Physician-oriented result reporting in an intensive care environment. Proc MEDINFO 1986;810–2.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Cox Jr J, Kimura TD, Moore P, Gillett W, Stucki MJ. Design studies suggested by an abstract model for a medical information system. Proc SCAMC. 1980;3:1485–94.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Cozen HJ. Computer generated anesthesia record. Proc SCAMC. 1979;615–7.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Crouse L, Wiederhold G. An advanced computer for real-time medical applications. Comp Biomed Res. 1969;2:582–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Davis RS, Jack DB. A surgical cut into computers. MD Comput. 1985;3:21–8.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Dayhoff RE, Ledley RS, Rotolo LS. Newborn screening information system (NBSIS). Proc SCAMC. 1984;253–6.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Diehl M. Strategy for large-scale dental automation. Dent Clin N Am. 1986;30:745–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Diehl MC, Neiburger EJ. A history of computer applications in dental practice. Proc AAMSI. 1987:362–6.

    Google Scholar 

  49. ECRI. Clinical information systems improve with new standard. Health Tech Trends. 1989;1:3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Elshtain EL, Haessler HA, Harden CM, Holland T. Field study of an automated pediatric data base history. Proc Symp Medical Data Processing. Toulouse: IRIA; 1973. p. 47–53.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Engelke SC, Paulette EW, Kopelman AE. Neonatal information system using an interactive microcomputer data base management program. Proc SCAMC. 1981;284–5.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Enterline JP, Lenhard RE, Blum BI. The oncology clinical information system. In: Enterline JP, Lenhard RE, Blum BI, editors. A Clinical Information System for Oncology. New York: Springer; 1989. p. 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ertel PY, Pritchett EL, Chase RC, Ambuel JP. An outpatient data system. New techniques to meet new demands. JAMA. 1970;211:964–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Farr FL, Clark JS, Gardner RM, Veasy LG. Using a dedicated small computer in conjunction with a time-shared system in a hospital intensive care unit. Comp Biomed Res. 1972;5:535–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Finney JC. Programmed interpretation of MMPI and CPI. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1966;15:75–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Fowler RD. The current status of computer interpretation of psychological tests. Am J Psychiatry. 1969;125:21–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Friedman C, Hripcsak G, Johnson SB, Cimino JJ, Clayton PD. A generalized relational schema for an integrated clinical patient database. Proc SCAMC. 1990;335–9.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Friedman RH, Krikorian JG, Horwitz JH, Concannon TI. An information system for clinical research: the cancer data management system. Proc MEDINFO. 1980;876–80.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Fries JF, McShane DJ. ARAMIS: a prototypical national chronic-disease data bank. West J Med. 1986;145:798–804.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Fries JF, McShane D. ARAMIS: a national chronic disease data bank system. Proc SCAMC. 1979;798–801.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Gabrieli ER. Standardization of medical informatics (special issue). J Clin Comput. 1985;14:62–104.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Garrett Jr L, Stead WW, Hammond WE. Conversion of manual to total computerized medical records. J Med Syst. 1983;7:301–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Gardner DW, Klatchko DM. A microcomputer based diabetic patient registry for patient management and clinical research. Proc SCAMC. 1985;87–9.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Giebink GA, Hurst LL. Computer projects in health care. Ann Arbor: Health Administration Press; 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Gildea TJ, Bell CW. Advanced techniques in pulmonary function test analysis interpretation and diagnosis. Proc SCAMC. 1980;1:258–65.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Goldsmith MF. Computers star in new communication concepts for physically disabled people. JAMA. 1989;261:1256–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Gonzalez F, Fox H. The development and implementation of a computerized on‐line obstetric record. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989;96:1323–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Gotcher SB, Carrick J, Vallbona C, Spencer WA, Carter RE, Cornell S. Daily treatment planning with an on-line shared computer system. Methods Inf Med. 1969;8:200–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Greist JH, Klein MH, Erdman HP, Jefferson JW. Clinical computer applications in mental health. J Med Syst. 1983;7:175–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Grover J, Spellacy W, Winegar A. Utilization of the University of Illinois regional perinatal database in three areas. Proc AAMSI. 1983;144–7.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Hammer JS, Lyons JS, Strain JJ. Micro-cares: an information management system for psychosocial services in hospital settings. Proc SCAMC. 1984; 234–7.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Hammond KW, Munnecke TH. A computerized psychiatric treatment planning system. Psychiat Serv. 1984;35:160–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Hammond WE, Stead WW. Bedside terminals: an editorial. MD Comput. 1988;5(1):5–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Hancock WM, Walter PF, More RA, Glick ND. Operating room scheduling data base analysis for scheduling. J Med Syst. 1988;12:397–409.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Harbort RA, Paulsen AW, Frazier WT. Computer generated anesthesia records. Proc SCAMC. 1980;3:1603–10.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Harris TR, Bahr JP, editors. The use of computers in perinatal medicine. New York: Praeger Publishing; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Henley RR, Wiederhold G. An analysis of automated ambulatory medical record systems. San Francisco: Office of Medical Information Systems, University of California, San Francisco Medical Center; 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Herner & Co. The use of computers in hospitals: report III-survey analysis; report IV- descriptions of computer applications. Bethesda: National Center for Health Services Research; 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Hilberman M, Kamm B, Lamy M, Dietrich HP, Martz K, Osborn JJ. Prediction of respiratory adequacy following cardiac surgery. In: Cox JR, Hugenholtz PG, editors. Computers in Cardiology. Long Beach: IEEE Computer Society. 1974;2–4.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Hogan MJ, Wallin JD, Kelly MR, Baer R, Barzyk P, Sparks HA. A computerized paramedical approach to the outpatient management of essential hypertension. Mil Med. 1978;143:771–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Hon EH. Computer aids in evaluating fetal distress. In: Stacy RW, Waxman BD, editors. Computers in biomedical research. New York: Academic; 1965. p. 409–37.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Hoppenbrouwers T, Jilek J, Arakawa K. A system for monitoring cardiorespiratory variables and transcutaneous blood gases during sleep in the newborn and young infant. Proc MEDINFO. 1983;644–7.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Horwitz J, Thompson H, Concannon T, Friedman RH, Krikorian J, Gertman PM. Computer-assisted patient care management in medical oncology. Proc SCAMC. 1980;2:771–8.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Hubbard SM, Martin NB, Blankenbaker LW, Esterhay RJ, Masys DR, et al. The physician data query (PDQ) cancer information system. J Cancer Educ. 1986;1:79–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Jacobs I. Computers in ophthalmology. MD Comput. 1985;2:28–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Jacobsen TJ, Lockee C, Sands C. Development of an operating room management information system using multi-user microcomputer technology. Proc SCAMC. 1984;646–8.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Janik DS, Swarner OW, Henriksen KM, Wyman ML. A computerized single entry system for recording and reporting data on high-risk newborn infants. J Pediatr. 1978;93:519–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Jelovsek FR. Computers in the examining room, the delivery room, and the nursery. MD Comput. 1984;1:52–8.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Jelovsek F, Hammond WE. Experience in computerization of perinatal medical records. Univ Mich Med Cent J. 1977;43:5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Jelovsek FR. Computers in the examining room, the delivery room, and the nursery. MD Comput. 1987;1:153–9.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Jelovsek FR, Deason BP, Richard H. Impact of an on-line information system on patients and personnel in the medical office. Proc SCAMC. 1982;85–8.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Jenkin MA. Clinical specialty systems as an introduction to clinical informatics. Proc AAMSI. 1983;223–7.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Jennett RJ, Gall D, Waterkotte GW, Warford HS. A computerized perinatal data system for a region. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978;131:157–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Johns RJ, Blum BI. The use of clinical information systems to control cost as well as to improve care. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 1978;80:140–51.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Johnson ME. Pulmonary testing laboratory computer application. Proc SCAMC. 1980;1:253–7.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Kahane SN, Goldberg HR, Roth HP, Lenhard RE, Johannes RS. A multimodal communications interface for endoscopy data collection with automated text report generation. Proc MEDINFO. 1986;26–30.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Kassirer JP, Brand DH, Schwartz WB. An automated system for data processing in the metabolic balance laboratory. Comp Biomed Res. 1971;4:181–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Keating III H.J., Sims SC, Balk MA. Computer assisted pre-operative evaluation (CAPE): a system description. Proc SCAMC. 1984;269.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Kessler RR. A comprehensive computer package for ambulatory surgical facilities. Proc SCAMC. 1980;3:1436–40.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Kilpatrick KE, Mackenzie RS, Delaney AG. Expanded-function auxiliaries in general dentistry: a computer simulation. Health Serv Res. 1972;7:288–300.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Knesper DJ, Quarton GC, Gorodezky MJ, Murray CW. A survey of the users of a working state mental health information system: implications for the development of improved systems. Proc SCAMC. 1978; 160–5.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Laboratories – Berekeley Scientific. A study of automated clinical laboratory systems. U.S. health services and mental health administration. Springfield: National Technical Information Service; 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Larks SD. Present status of fetal electrocardiography. Bio-Med Electron IRE Trans. 1962;9:176–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Laurent D, Mashruwala MD, Lucas CP. A computerized data-handling system in hypertension management. Arch Intern Med. 1980;140:345–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Lederman M, Weil JP. ORIS (operating room information system): a solution whose time has come. US Healthc. 1989;6:32–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Lenhard RE, Blum BI, McColligan EE. An information system for oncology. In: Blum BI, editor. An Information System for Patient Care. New York: Springer-Verlag;1984;385–403.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Lenhard RE, Waalkes TP, Herring D. Evaluation of the clinical management of cancer patients: a pilot study. JAMA. 1983;250:3310–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Lenhard RE, Blum BI, Sunderland JM, Braine HG, Saral R. The Johns Hopkins oncology clinical information system. J Med Syst. 1983;7:147–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Levy N, Say BA. Henry Ford Hospital nephrology information system. Proc MEDINFO. 1983;801–3.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Lewis HM, Wheeler JR, Gregory RT. Clinical data base management by microcomputer. J Med Syst. 1982;6:255–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Lindberg DAB. The computer and medical care. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas; 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Lomatch D, Truax T, Savage P. Use of a relational database to support clinical research: application in a diabetes Program. Proc SCAMC. 1981;291–5.

    Google Scholar 

  113. Lowensohn RI, Moawad AH, Pishotta FT, Gibbons PS. The computer-based OBFILE perinatal reporting system. Proc SCAMC. 1980;2:1192–5.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Lyman M, Chi E, Sager N. Automated case review of acute bacterial meningitis of childhood. Proc MEDINFO. 1983;790–3.

    Google Scholar 

  115. Malerstein AJ, Strotz CR, Starkweather JA. A practical approach to automation of psychiatric hospital records. J Biomed Syst. 1971;2:19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Marciniak TA, Leahey CF, Zufall E. Information systems in oncology. Proc MEDINFO. 1986;508–12.

    Google Scholar 

  117. Maurer Jr M, Moore P, Mead CN, Johnson JA, Marshall RE, Thomas Jr L. Data management for rapid access to newborn intensive care information. Proc SCAMC. 1980;3:1621–9.

    Google Scholar 

  118. McColligan EE. Implementing OCIS at Ohio State University. In: Enterline JP, Lenhard RE, Blum BI, editors. A clinical information systems for oncology. New York: Springer; 1989. p. 241–59.

    Google Scholar 

  119. McColligan E, Blum B, Brunn C. An automated care medical record system for ambulatory care. In: Kaplan B, Jelovsek FR, editors. Proc SCM/SAMS Joint Conf on Ambulatory Care. 1981;72–6.

    Google Scholar 

  120. McColligan EE, Jones CE, Lindberg D. An automated operating room scheduling and management information system. AAMSI Congress. 1983;83:517–22.

    Google Scholar 

  121. McColligan EE, Blum BI, Lenhard RE, Johnson MB. The human element in computer-generated patient management plans. J Med Syst. 1982;6:265–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. McColligan EE, Gordon TA, Jones CE, Stiff JL, Donham RT, Rogers MC. Automated utilization analysis as a foundation for effective operating room management. Proc SCAMC. 1984;227–30.

    Google Scholar 

  123. McDonald CJ, Tierney W, Blevins L. The benefits of automated medical record systems for ambulatory care. In: Orthner HE, Blum BI, editors. Implementing health care information systems. New York: Springer; 1989. p. 67–84.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  124. McDonald C, Blevins L, Glazener T, Haas J, Lemmon L, Meeks-Johnson J. Data base management, feedback control, and the regenstrief medical record. J Med Syst. 1983;7:111–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. McDonald CJ, Wilson G, Blevins L, Seeger J, Chamness D, Smith D, et al. The Regenstrief medical record system. Proc SCAMC. 1977;168.

    Google Scholar 

  126. Meldman MJ. Microprocessor technology for psychiatrists. Proc SCAMC. 1978;216–20.

    Google Scholar 

  127. Meldman MJ. Clinical computing in psychiatry: an integrated patient data base approach. Comput Med. 1975;4:1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  128. Menn SJ, Barnett GO, Schmechel D, Owens WD, Pontoppidan H. A computer program to assist in the care of acute respiratory failure. JAMA. 1973;223:308–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Mezzich JE, Coffman GA. A computerized alerting system regarding special-concern psychiatric patients. Proc SCAMC. 1984;449–52.

    Google Scholar 

  130. Michas CA, Wilcox JC, Walters RF. A computer-based surgery reporting system: an entry point to clinical information systems. West J Med. 1976;124:151–8.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Michenfelder JD, Terry HR, Anderholm FR, Shaw DG. The application of a new system for monitoring the surgical patient. Proc 18th Annual Conf Eng Med Biol. 1965;7: 233.

    Google Scholar 

  132. Miller PL. ATTENDING: a system which critiques an anesthetic management plan. Proc AMIA. 1982;36–40.

    Google Scholar 

  133. Miller RA, Kapoor WN, Peterson J. The use of relational databases as a tool for conducting clinical studies. Proc SCAMC. 1983;705–8.

    Google Scholar 

  134. Moffatt PH, Heisler BD, Mela WD, Alpert JJ, Goldstein HM. MARCO (Medical Record Communications): system concept, design and evaluation. Proc SCAMC. 1978;451–68.

    Google Scholar 

  135. Muller JH, Kerner ER, Fitzgerald MA. Spirometry for office-based physicians. Med Electron. 1986;70–6.

    Google Scholar 

  136. Nagey DA, Wright JN, Mulligan K, Crenshaw Jr C. A convertible perinatal database. MD Comput Comp Med Pract. 1988;6:28–36.

    Google Scholar 

  137. Nault FG, Hanson RJ, L’Heureux D, Mermelstein PD. Evaluation of operating room facilities and personnel utilization. In: Emlet HE, editor. Challenges and prospects for advanced medical systems. Miami: Symposia Specialists; 1978. p. 61–8.

    Google Scholar 

  138. Overall JE, Hollister LE. Computer program for recommendation of treatment for psychiatry patients. Proc 16th Annual Conf Eng Biol. 1963;5:126–7.

    Google Scholar 

  139. Pearlman MH, Hammond E, Thompson HK. An automated “well-baby” questionnaire. Pediatrics. 1973;51:972–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. Pearson JS, Swenson WM, Rome HP, Mataya P, Brannick TL. Further experience with the automated Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory. Mayo Clin Proc. 1964;39:823–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Piotrowski ZA. Digital-computer interpretation of inkblot test data. Psychiatr Q. 1964;38:1–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Pollak VE, Buncher CR, Donovan ER. On-line computerized data handling system for treating patients with renal disease. Arch Intern Med. 1977;137:446–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Porter D. Patient responses to computer counseling. Proc SCAMC. 1978;233–7.

    Google Scholar 

  144. Post EM, Bolitsky BA. Integration of computer utilization for medical office practice. Proc SCAMC. 1987;631–5.

    Google Scholar 

  145. Pryor DB, Stead WW, Hammond WE, Califf RM, Rosati RA. Features of TMR for a successful clinical and research database. Proc SCAMC. 1982;79–83.

    Google Scholar 

  146. Pryor DB, Califf RM, Harrell FE, Hlatky MA, Lee KL, Mark DB, et al. Clinical data bases: accomplishments and unrealized potential. Med Care. 1985;23:623–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. Pryor TA, Ho SJ, Stephen RL. Computer systems for management and research in end-stage renal disease. In: Shoemaker WC, Tavares BM, editors. Current topics in critical care medicine, vol. 3. Basel: S. Karger; 1977. p. 93–111.

    Google Scholar 

  148. Reisman A, Emmons H, Morito S, Rivaud J, Green EJ. Planning a dental practice with a management game. J Med Syst. 1978;2:71–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  149. Robson J, Braunstein HM. Computerized growth record for clinic use. Pediatrics. 1977;60:643–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  150. Rome HP. Automation techniques in personality assessment: the problem and procedure. JAMA. 1962;182:1069–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  151. Rosen MG, Sokol RJ, Chik L. Use of computers in the labor and delivery suite: an overview. Obstet Gynecol. 1978;132:589–94.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  152. Rosner SW, Palmer A, Caceres CA. A computer program for computation and interpretation of pulmonary function data. Comp Biomed Res. 1971;4:141–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  153. Rothrock JJ. ASTM: the standards make the pieces fit. Proc AAMSI Congr. 1989;327–35.

    Google Scholar 

  154. Rutt TE. Work of IEEE P1157 medical data interchange committee. Int J Clin Monit Comput. 1989;6:45–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  155. Sadler Jr C. Orthopedic computing: bone and joint computer connection. MD Comput. 1984;1:39–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  156. Safran C, Porter D, Lightfoot J, Rury CD, Underhill LH, Bleich HL, et al. ClinQuery: a system for online searching of data in a teaching hospital. Ann Intern Med. 1989;111:751–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  157. Sanders SJ, Sheppard AP, Spurlock JM. Micro-computer controlled care system for the severely physically impaired. Proc SCAMC. 1984;886–91.

    Google Scholar 

  158. Schenthal JE. Clinical concepts in the application of large scale electronic data processing. Proc 2nd IBM Medical Symp. Endicott, NY: IBM.1960;391–9.

    Google Scholar 

  159. Schenthal JE. Development aspects of a biomedical data processing systems. Proc 3rd IBM medical symposium. Endicott: IBM; pp 167–74.

    Google Scholar 

  160. Schmidt NM, Brown ACD. The prediction of surgeon-specific operating room time. Proc SCAMC. 1984;800–4.

    Google Scholar 

  161. Seime RJ, Rine DC. The behavioral medicine data retrieval and analysis program at West Virginia University Medical Center. Proc SCAMC. 1978;125–36.

    Google Scholar 

  162. Serber MJ, Mackey R, Young CW. The Sloan-Kettering information system for clinical oncology. Proc SCAMC. 1980;2:728–32.

    Google Scholar 

  163. Shaffer MJ, Kaiser PR, Klingenmaier CH, Gordon MR. Manual record-keeping and statistical records for the operating room. Med Instrum. 1978;12:192–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  164. Shonfeld EM, Kerekes J, Rademacher CA, Weihrer AL, Abraham S, Silver H, et al. Methodology for computer measurement of pulmonary function curves. CHEST J. 1964;46:427–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  165. Simborg DW. An emerging standard for health communications: the HL7 standard. Healthc Comput Commun. 1987;4:58. 60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  166. Slack WV. Patient counseling by computer. Proc SCAMC. 1978;222–6.

    Google Scholar 

  167. Slack WV, Slack CW. Talking to a computer about emotional problems: a comparative study. Psychother Theory Res Pract. 1977;14:156–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  168. Slack WV, Slack CW. Patient-computer dialogue. N Engl J Med. 1972;286:1304–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  169. Slosarik W, Luger G, Kirkpatrick J, Koffler H, Burstein R. The UNMH intensive care information system. Proc SCAMC. 1980;1576–80.

    Google Scholar 

  170. Southard TE, Rails SA. A computerized dental examination record system. Comput Bio Med. 1986;16:59–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  171. Spencer WA, Vallbona C. Digitation of clinical and research data in serial evaluation of disease processes. IRE Trans Med Electron. 1960;ME-7:296–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  172. Spencer WA. An opinion survey of computer applications in 149 hospitals in the USA, Europe and Japan. Inform Health Soc Care. 1976;1:215–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  173. Spencer WA, Vallbona C. A preliminary report on the use of electronic data processing technics in the description and evaluation of disability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1962;43:22–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  174. Starkweather JA. Computer simulation of psychiatric interviewing. In: Kline N, Laska EM, editors. Computers and electronic devices in psychiatry. New York: Grune & Stratton; 1968. p. 12–9.

    Google Scholar 

  175. Starkweather JA. Computer methods for the study of psychiatric interviews. Compr Psychiatry. 1967;8:509–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  176. Starkweather JA. Computest: a computer language for individual testing, instruction, and interviewing. Psychol Rep. 1965;17:227–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  177. Starkweather JA, Decker JB. Computer analysis of interview content. Psychol Rep. 1964;15:875–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  178. Stead WW, Brame RG, Hammond WE, Jelovser FR, Estes EH, Parker RT. A computerized obstetric medical record. Obstet Gynecol. 1977;49:502–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  179. Stead WW, Hammond WE. How to realize savings with a computerized medical record. Proc SCAMC. 1980;2:1200–5.

    Google Scholar 

  180. Stead WW, Hammond WE, Straube MJ. A chartless record: is it adequate? Proc SCAMC. 1982;89–94.

    Google Scholar 

  181. Stead WW, Hammond WE. Functions required to allow TMR to support the information requirements of a hospital. Proc SCAMC. 1983;106–9.

    Google Scholar 

  182. Stead WW, Hammond WE, Winfree RG. Beyond a basic HIS: work stations for department management. Proc SCAMC. 1984;197–9.

    Google Scholar 

  183. Stead WW, Hammond WE, Straube MJ. A chartless record: is it adequate? J Med Syst. 1983;7:103–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  184. Stillman R, Roth WT, Colby KM, Rosenbaum CP. An on-line computer system for initial psychiatric inventory. Am J Psychiatry. 1969;125:8–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  185. Stodolsky D. The computer as a psychotherapist. Int J Man-Mach Stud. 1970;2:327–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  186. Strotz CR, Malerstein AJ, Starkweather JA. SEARCH: a physician-oriented, computer-based information retrieval system. J Biomed Syst. 1970;1:41–8.

    Google Scholar 

  187. Swenson WM. An aging psychologist assesses the impact of age on MMPI profiles. Psychiatr Ann. 1985;15:554–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  188. Swenson WM. Symposium on automation technics in personality testing: the test. Mayo Clinic Proc. 1962;37:65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  189. Swenson WM, Pearson JS. Psychiatry: psychiatric screening. J Chronic Dis. 1966;19:497–507.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  190. Tepas DI. Computer use in the psychology laboratory: a survey. Comput Programs Biomed. 1974;4:53–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  191. Thomas JC, Moore AC. Content of an automated ambulatory record system for clinical decisions. In: Hinman EJ, editor. Advanced medical systems: the 3rd century. Miami: Symposia Specialists; 1977. p. 153–60.

    Google Scholar 

  192. Thompson DA. Monitoring total parenteral nutrition with the pocket computer. Comput Nurs. 1984;2:183–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  193. Tira DE, Tharp LB, Lipson LF. Computers in dental education. Promise of the past versus reality of the present. Dent Clin N Am. 1986;30:681–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  194. Tolchin SG, Barta W. Local network and distributed processing issues in the Johns Hopkins Hospital. J Med Syst. 1986;10:339–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  195. Truax T, Savage P, Lomatch D. Microcomputer assisted data management in a diabetes clinic. Proc SCAMC. 1980;2:1183–91.

    Google Scholar 

  196. Vallbona C. The usefulness of computers in the management of the chronically ill and disabled. So Med Bull. 1969;57:25–8.

    Google Scholar 

  197. Vallbona C, Spencer WA. Texas institute for research and rehabilitation hospital computer system (Houston). In: Collen MF, editor. Hospital computer systems. New York: Wiley; 1974. p. 662–700.

    Google Scholar 

  198. Vallbona C, Spencer WA, Moffet CL. The patient care centered information system of the Texas Institute for Rehabilitation and Research. In: Collen MF, editor. Proc Int Conf on Health Technol Syst. ORSA. 1973;232–60.

    Google Scholar 

  199. Vallbona C, Spencer WA, Geddes LA, Blose WF, Canzoneri J. Experience with on-line monitoring in critical illness. Spectr IEEE. 1966;3:136–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  200. Vallbona C, Pevny E, McMath F. Computer analysis of blood gases and of acid-base status. Comput Biomed Res. 1971;4:623–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  201. Warner HR. Experiences with computer-based patient monitoring. Anesth Analg. 1968;47:453–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  202. Wasserman AI, Stinson SK. A specification method for interactive medical information systems. Proc SCAMC. 1980;3:1471–8.

    Google Scholar 

  203. Wheeler PS, Simborg DW, Gitlin JN. The Johns Hopkins radiology reporting system. Radiology. 1976;119:315–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  204. Wilson DH. A private practice medical computing system: an evolutionary approach. Comput Med. 1974;3:1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  205. Wirtschafter DD, Blackwell WC, Goldenberg RL, et al. A county-wide obstetrical automated medical record system. J Med Syst. 1982;6:277–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  206. Witten M. PEDS: an expert pediatric evaluation and diagnostic system. Proc SCAMC. 1987;507–13.

    Google Scholar 

  207. Yeh S, Lincoln T. From micro to mainframe. Am J Perinatol. 1985;2:158–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  208. Yeh S, Teberg AJ, Phelan JR. A practical approach to perinatal data processing in a large obsteric population. Proc MEDINFO. 1983;656–8.

    Google Scholar 

  209. Young B. Anesthesiologists breathe easier with computer assistance. Comput Med. 1981;10:1.

    Google Scholar 

  210. Zajac TH. A microcomputer based management control system in the operating suite. Proc SCAMC. 1984;242–5.

    Google Scholar 

  211. Zimmerman JL. Computer applications in dentistry. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  212. Zviran M, Blow R. DMSS: a computer-based diabetes monitoring system. J Med Syst. 1989;13:293–308.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nancy M. Lorenzi Ph.D., M.A., M.S. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Collen, M.F., Lorenzi, N.M. (2015). Information Systems for Clinical Subspecialties. In: Collen, M., Ball, M. (eds) The History of Medical Informatics in the United States. Health Informatics. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6732-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6732-7_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6731-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6732-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics