Abstract
How can Embodied Virtual Agents (EVAs, often misleadingly called “avatars”) facilitate access to modern information and communication technologies for older people? Several studies and theoretical considerations point out their strong potential benefits, as well as their pitfalls and limitations. This chapter provides a survey of current studies, technologies, and applications, and shall provide guidance as to when and how to employ an EVA for the benefit of older adults. The reviewed studies encompass robotics, EVAs, and specific questions regarding the e-inclusion of the target user group.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267–299.
Argyle, M., Trower, P., & Kristal, L. (1979). Person to person: Ways of communicating. London: Harper & Row.
Bailenson, J. N., & Blascovich, J. (2004). Avatars. In Encyclopedia of human-computer interaction. Great Barrington: Berkshire Publishing Group.
Barberis, D., Garazzino, N., Prinetto, P., & Tiotto, G. (2011). Improving accessibility for deaf people: An editor for computer assisted translation through virtual avatars. In K. F. McCoy & Y. Yesilada (Eds.), ASSETS (pp. 253–254). ACM.
Barefoot, J. C., Maynard, K. E., Beckham, J. C., Brummett, B. H., Hooker, K., & Siegler, I. C. (1998). Trust, health, and longevity. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 21(6), 517–526.
Bartneck, C. (2003). Interacting with an embodied emotional character. In Proceedings of the 2003 international conference on designing pleasurable products and interfaces (pp. 55–60). New York: ACM.
Bates, J. (1994). The role of emotion in believable agents. Communications of the ACM, 37(7), 122–125.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497.
Baylor, A. L., & Ryu, J. (2003). The effects of image and animation in enhancing pedagogical agent persona. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 28(4), 373–394.
Beale, R., & Creed, C. (2009). Affective interaction: How emotional agents affect users. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67(9), 755–776.
Beck, A. M., & Meyers, N. M. (1996). Health enhancement and companion animal ownership. Annual Review of Public Health, 17(1), 247–257.
Beck, A. M., Edwards, N., Friedman, B., & Khan, P. (2003). Robotic pets and the elderly. Project overview: http://www.ischool.washington.edu/robotpets/elderly
Benoît, C. (1996). On the production and the perception of audio-visual speech by man and machine. In Multimedia & video coding. New York: Plenum Press.
Bente, G., Rüggenberg, S., Krämer, N. C., & Eschenburg, F. (2008). Avatar-mediated networking: Increasing social presence and interpersonal trust in net-based collaborations. Human Communication Research, 34(2), 287–318.
Berkman, L. F., & Syme, S. L. (1979). Social networks, host resistance, and mortality: A nine-year follow-up study of Alameda County residents. American Journal of Epidemiology, 109(2), 186–204.
Beun, R. J., De Vos, E., & Witteman, C. L. M. (2003). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2792, 315–319.
Bickmore, T. W. (2003). Relational agents: Effecting change through human-computer relationships. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Bickmore, T., & Cassell, J. (2001). Relational agents: A model and implementation of building user trust. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 396–403. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=365304
Bickmore, T., & Cassell, J. (2005). Social dialogue with embodied conversational agents. In Advances in natural multimodal dialogue systems (pp. 23–54). Netherlands: Springer.
Bickmore, T., & Gruber, A. (2010). Relational agents in clinical psychiatry. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 18(2), 119–130.
Bickmore, T. W., Puskar, K., Schlenk, K. A., Pfeifer, L. M., & Sereika, S. M. (2010). Maintaining reality: Relational agents for antipsychotic medication adherence. Interacting with Computers, 22(4), 276–288.
Bickmore, T. W., & Picard, R. W. (2004). Towards caring machines. CHI’04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, 1489–1492.
Bickmore, T. W., & Picard, R. W. (2005). Establishing and maintaining long-term human-computer relationships. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 12(2), 293–327.
Bickmore, T. W., Caruso, L., & Clough-Gorr, K. (2005). Acceptance and usability of a relational agent interface by urban older adults. In CHI’05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 1212–1215). New York: Elsevier Science Inc.
Bickmore, T. W., Mauer, D., & Brown, T. (2009). Context awareness in a handheld exercise agent. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 5(3), 226–235.
Bickmore, T. W., Pfeifer, L. M., & Jack, B. W. (2009a). Taking the time to care: Empowering low health literacy hospital patients with virtual nurse agents. In Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 1265–1274). New York: ACM. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1518891
Blascovich, J., Loomis, J., Beall, A. C., Swinth, K. R., Hoyt, C. L., & Bailenson, J. N. (2002). Immersive virtual environment technology as a methodological tool for social psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 13(2), 103–124.
Booth, M. L., Owen, N., Bauman, A., Clavisi, O., & Leslie, E. (2000). Social-cognitive and perceived environment influences associated with physical activity in older Australians. Preventive Medicine, 31(1), 15–22.
Bosse, T., Siddiqui, G., & Treur, J. (2010). An intelligent virtual agent to increase involvement in financial services. In Intelligent virtual agents (Lecture notes in computer science, Vol. 6356, pp. 378–384). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
Brewer, M. B., & Hewstone, M. (2004). Emotion and motivation. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
Buisine, S., & Martin, J. C. (2007). The effects of speech-gesture cooperation in animated agents’ behavior in multimedia presentations. Interacting with Computers, 19, 484–493.
Buisine, S., & Martin, J. C. (2010). The influence of user’s personality and gender on the processing of virtual agents’ multimodal behavior. Advances in Psychology Research, 65, 1–14.
Burgoon, J. K. (1994). Nonverbal signals. In M. L. Knapp & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (2nd ed., pp. 229–285). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2009). Action, affect, and two-mode models of functioning. In Oxford handbook of human action (pp. 298–327). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cassell, J. (2000). Nudge nudge wink wink: Elements of face-to-face conversation for embodied conversational agents. In Embodied conversational agents (pp. 1–27). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Cassell, J., & Thorisson, K. R. (1999). The power of a nod and a glance: Envelope vs. emotional feedback in animated conversational agents. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 13(4-5), 519–538.
Charles, S. T., & Carstensen, L. L. (2010). Social and emotional aging. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 383–409.
Cortellessa, G., Scopelliti, M., Tiberio, L., Koch Svedberg, G., Loutfi, A., & Pecora, F. A. (2008). Cross-cultural evaluation of domestic assistive robots. In Proceedings of AAAI fall symposium on AI in eldercare: New solutions to old problems, November 7–9, Arlington, VA, USA.
Crombie, I. K., Irvine, L., Williams, B., McGinnis, A. R., Slane, P. W., Alder, E. M., & McMurdo, M. E. T. (2004). Why older people do not participate in leisure time physical activity: A survey of activity levels, beliefs and deterrents. Age and Ageing, 33(3), 287–292.
Dautenhahn, K. (2004). Robots we like to live with?! – A developmental perspective on a personalized, life-long robot companion. Robot and human interactive communication, 2004. ROMAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on, 17–22.
de Melo, C., Carnevale, P., & Gratch, J. (2010). The influence of emotions in embodied agents on human decision-making. In Proceedings of Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA’10) (pp. 357–370).
DiSalvo, C., Gemperle, F., Forlizzi, J., & Montgomery, E. (2003). The hug: An exploration of robotic form for intimate communication. Robot and human interactive communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003. The 12th IEEE international workshop on, 403–408.
European Union. (n.a.). E-Inclusion … what next? Embracing the future of social innovation 2010–2015. http://ec.europa.eu. Accessed 30 May 2012.
Eizmendi, G., & Craddock, G. M. (2007). Challenges for assistive technology: AAATE 07 (20th ed.). Amsterdam: IOS Press Inc.
Emiliani, P. L., Stephanidis, C., & Vanderheiden, G. (2011). Technology and inclusion–past, present and foreseeable future. Technology and Disability, 23(3), 101–114.
Fagel, S. (2006). Emotional mcgurk effect. Proceedings of the international conference on speech prosody (Ed. 1).
Fagel, S., & Madany, K. (2008). Computeranimierte Sprechbewegungen in realen Anwendungen. Berlin: Univ.-Verl. der TU, Univ.-Bibliothek.
Feil-Seifer, D., & Mataric, M. J. (2005). Defining socially assistive robotics. 9th international conference on rehabilitation robotics, ICORR 2005, Berlin, 465–468. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=1501143&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D1501143
Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., & Dautenhahn, K. (2003). A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3), 143–166.
Garau, M., Slater, M., Vinayagamoorthy, V., Brogni, A., Steed, A., & Sasse, M. A. (2003). The impact of avatar realism and eye gaze control on perceived quality of communication in a shared immersive virtual environment. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 529–536. http://lirec.eu/biblio/1497
Gockley, R., & Mataric, M. J. (2006). Encouraging physical therapy compliance with a hands-off mobile robot. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on human-robot interaction, Salt Lake City, March 2–3 (pp. 150–155).
Gockley, R., Bruce, A., Forlizzi, J., Michalowski, M., Mundell, A., Rosenthal, S., Sellner, B., et al. (2005). Designing robots for long-term social interaction. 2005 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, 2005 (IROS 2005), 1338–1343. https://www.ri.cmu.edu/publication_view.html?pub_id=5168
Gong, L. (2007). Is happy better than sad even if they are both non-adaptive? Effects of emotional expressions of talking-head interface agents. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(3), 183–191.
Gratch, J., Okhmatovskaia, A., Lamothe, F., Marsella, S., Morales, M., van der Werf, R., & Morency, L. P. (2006). Virtual rapport. In Intelligent virtual agents (pp. 14–27).
Guide. (2007). GUIDE project webpage. http://www.guide-project.eu/. Accessed 3 Jan 2013.
Gump, B. B., & Kulik, J. A. (1997). Stress, affiliation, and emotional contagion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(2), 305.
Hans, M., Graf, B., & Schraft, R. D. (2002). Robotic home assistant care-o-bot: Past-present-future. In Proceedings of 11th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication, 2002 (pp. 380–385). Berlin: IEEE.
Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Wielinga, B., & Evers, V. (2006). Studying the acceptance of a robotic agent by elderly users. International Journal of Assistive Robotics and Mechatronics, 7(3), 33–43.
Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Evers, V., & Wielinga, B. (2008a). The influence of social presence on enjoyment and intention to use of a robot and screen agent by elderly users. In Proceedings of the 17th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, 2008 (RO-MAN 2008) (pp. 695–700). Munich: IEEE.
Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Wielinga, B., & Evers, V. (2008b). Enjoyment, intention to use and actual use of a conversational robot by elderly people. 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI) (pp. 113–119). Munich: IEEE.
Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Evers, V., & Wielinga, B. (2010). Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: The almere model. International Journal of Social Robotics, 2(4), 361–375.
Holden, M. K., & Dyar, T. (2002). Virtual environment training: A new tool for neurorehabilitation. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy, 26(2), 62.
Hone, K. (2006). Empathic agents to reduce user frustration: The effects of varying agent characteristics. Interacting with Computers, 18(2), 227–245.
Hongpaisanwiwat, C., & Lewis, M. (2003). Attentional effect of animated character. Proceedings of the human-computer interaction, 423–430. http://www.isp.pitt.edu/node/1033
Hudlicka, E., Becker-Asano, C., Payr, S., Fischer, K., Ventura, R., Leite, I., & von Scheve, C. (2009). Social interaction with robots and agents: Where do we stand, Where do we go? In 3rd international conference on affective computing and intelligent interaction and workshops, 2009 (ACII 2009) (pp. 1–6). Amsterdam: IEEE.
Inter Ikea Systems B. V. (1999–2012). Ikea, Welcome. http://idea.com/us/en/. Accessed 12 Dec 2012.
Ijsselsteijn, W. A., Kort, Y. A. W., Westerink, J., Jager, M., & Bonants, R. (2006). Virtual fitness: Stimulating exercise behavior through media technology. Presence Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 15(6), 688–698.
Jensen, A., Wilson, D.-M., Jordine, K., & Sakpal, R. (2012). Using embodied pedagogical agents and direct instruction to improve learning outcomes for young children with learning disabilities. Global TIME 2012, 2012(1), 235–239.
Johnson, W. L., Rickel, J. W., & Lester, J. C. (2000). Animated pedagogical agents: Face-to-face interaction in interactive learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11(1), 47–78.
Kamarck, T. W., Manuck, S. B., & Jennings, J. R. (1990). Social support reduces cardiovascular reactivity to psychological challenge: A laboratory model. Psychosomatic Medicine, 52(1), 42–58.
Kaminsky, T. A., Dudgeon, B. J., Billingsley, F. F., Mitchell, P. H., Weghorst, S. J., et al. (2007). Virtual cues and functional mobility of people with Parkinson’s disease: A single-subject pilot study. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 44(3), 437.
Kanda, T., Hirano, T., Eaton, D., & Ishiguro, H. (2004). Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children: A field trial. Human Computer Interaction, 19(1), 61–84.
Kidd, C. D. (2007). Engagement in long-term human-robot interaction. PhD thesis in Media Arts & Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Klein, J., Moon, Y., & Picard, R. W. (2002). This computer responds to user frustration: Theory, design, and results. Interacting with computers, 14(2), 119–140.
Koda, T., & Maes, P. (1996). Agents with faces: The effect of personification. 5th IEEE international workshop on robot and human communication, 1996 (pp. 189–194). Tsukuba: IEEE.
Krahmer, E. J., & Swerts, M. (2006). Hearing and seeing beats: The influence of visual beats on the production and perception of prominence. Proceedings of speech prosody 2006. http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/2007-13192-004
Krämer, N. C., & Bente, G. (2010). Personalizing e-learning. The social effects of pedagogical agents. Educational Psychology Review, 22(1), 71–87.
Krämer, N., Hoffmann, L., & Kopp, S. (2010). Know your users! Empirical results for tailoring an agent’s nonverbal behavior to different user groups. Intelligent virtual agents (pp. 468–474). Heidelberg: Springer.
Krämer, N. C., Eimler, S., von der Pütten, A., & Payr, S. (2011). Theory of companions: What can theoretical models contribute to applications and understanding of human-robot interaction? Applied Artificial Intelligence, 25(6), 474–502.
Kriglstein, S., & Wallner, G. (2005). HOMIE: An artificial companion for elderly people. CHI (Bd. 5, S. 02–07).
Kryla-Lighthall, N., & Mather, M. (2009). The role of cognitive control in older adults’ emotional well-being. In V. Berngtson, D. Gans, N. Putney, & M. Silverstein (Eds.), Handbook of theories of aging (2nd ed., pp. 323–344). Springer.
Lawson, S. W., & Chesney, T. (2007). The impact of owner age on companionship with virtual pets. In Eighth international conference on Information Visualisation (IV’04) (Vol. 4, pp. 1922–1928).
Lee, M. L., & Dey, A. K. (2008). Lifelogging memory appliance for people with episodic memory impairment. Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Ubiquitous computing, 44–53.
Lester, J. C., Converse, S. A., Kahler, S. E., Barlow, S. T., Stone, B. A., & Bhogal, R. S. (1997). The persona effect: Affective impact of animated pedagogical agents. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 359–366). New York: ACM. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=258797
Looije, R., Cnossen, F., & Neerinex, M. (2006). Incorporating guidelines for health assistance into a socially intelligent robot. The 15th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, 2006, ROMAN 2006 (pp. 515–520). Hatfield: IEEE.
Mark, G. (1999). Designing believable interaction by applying social conventions. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 13(3), 297–320.
McCalley, T., & Mertens, A. (2007). The pet plant: Developing an inanimate emotionally interactive tool for the elderly. Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on persuasive technology (pp. 68–79). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
Mohseni, M., & Lindstrom, M. (2007). Social capital, trust in the health-care system and self-rated health: The role of access to health care in a population-based study. Social Science & Medicine, 64(7), 1373–1383.
Morandell, M., Fugger, E., & Prazak, B. (2007). The Alzheimer Avatar-Caregivers’ faces used as GUI component. In Challenges for assistive technology AAATE (pp. 180–184). IOS Press: Amsterdam.
Morandell, M., Hochgatterer, A., Fagel, S., & Wassertheurer, S. (2008). Avatars in assistive homes for the elderly. In HCI and usability for education and work (pp. 391–402). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-540-89350-9_27
Moreno, R., Mayer, R. E., Spires, H. A., & Lester, J. C. (2001). The case for social agency in computer-based teaching: Do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents? Cognition and Instruction, 19(2), 177–213.
Nass, C., Isbister, K., & Lee, E. J. (2000). Truth is beauty: Researching embodied conversational agents. In J. Cassell, J. Sullivan, S. Prevost, & E. L. Churchill (Eds.), Embodied conversational agents (pp. 374–402). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Nijholt, A. (2002). Embodied agents: A new impetus to humor research. In The April Fools’ Day workshop on computational humour (pp. 101–111), Trento, Italy, 15–16 April.
Nowak, K. L., & Biocca, F. (2003). The effect of the agency and anthropomorphism on users’ sense of telepresence, copresence, and social presence in virtual environments. Presence Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 12(5), 481–494.
Okonkwo, C., & Vassileva, J. (2001). Affective pedagogical agents and user persuasion. In Universal access in human-computer interaction. New Orleans, USA.
Ortiz, A., del Puy Carretero, M., Oyarzun, D., Yanguas, J., Buiza, C., Gonzalez, M., & Etxeberria, I. (2007). Elderly users in ambient intelligence: Does an avatar improve the interaction? Universal Access in Ambient Intelligence Environments, 4397, 99–114. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-540-71025-7_8
Pandzic, I. S., Ostermann, J., & Millen, D. (1999). User evaluation: Synthetic talking faces for interactive services. The Visual Computer, 15(7), 330–340.
Papalia, D. E., Camp, C. J., & Feldman, R. D. (1996). Adult development and aging. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Parise, S., Kiesler, S., Sproull, L., & Waters, K. (1999). Cooperating with life-like interface agents. Computers in Human Behavior, 15(2), 123–142.
Picard, R. W., & Klein, J. (2002). Computers that recognise and respond to user emotion: Theoretical and practical implications. Interacting with Computers, 14(2), 141–169.
Pollack, M. E., Brown, L., Colbry, D., McCarthy, C. E., Orosz, C., Peintner, B., Ramakrishnan, S., & Tsamardinos, I. (2003). Autominder: An intelligent cognitive orthotic system for people with memory impairment. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 44((3), 273–282.
Prendinger, H., Mori, J., & Ishizuka, M. (2005). Using human physiology to evaluate subtle expressivity of a virtual quizmaster in a mathematical game. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62(2), 231–245.
Qiu, L., & Benbasat, I. (2005). Online consumer trust and live help interfaces: The effects of text-to-speech voice and three-dimensional avatars. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 19(1), 75–94.
Raina, P., Waltner-Toews, D., Bonnett, B., Woodward, C., & Abernathy, T. (1999). Influence of companion animals on the physical and psychological health of older people: An analysis of a one-year longitudinal study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 47(3), 323–329. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10078895
Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Stanford: CSLI Publications/Cambridge University Press.
Rickenberg, R., & Reeves, B. (2000). The effects of animated characters on anxiety, task performance, and evaluations of user interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 49–56). New York: ACM. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=332406
Riedl, R., Mohr, P., Kenning, P., Davis, F., & Heekeren, H. (2011). Trusting humans and avatars: Behavioral and neural evidence. ICIS 2011 Proceedings (Paper 7).
Ruttkay, Z., Zwiers, J., van Welbergen, H., & Reidsma, D. (2006). Towards a reactive virtual trainer. In Intelligent virtual agents (pp. 292–303). Berlin/New York: Springer.
Salzman, B. (2010). Gait and balance disorders in older adults. American Family Physician, 82(1), 61–68.
San-Segundo, R., López, V., Martín, R., Lufti, S., Ferreiros, J., Córdoba, R., & Pardo, J. M. (2010). Advanced speech communication system for deaf people. In Proceedings of INTERSPEECH 2010, 11th annual conference of the international Speech Communication Association.
Scassellati, B. (2007). How social robots will help us to diagnose, treat, and understand autism. Robotics Research, 28, 552–563.
Schroeder, R. (2002). The social life of avatars: Presence and interaction in shared virtual environments. Berlin: Springer.
Shibata, T., Wada, K., & Tanie, K. (2003). Statistical analysis and comparison of questionnaire results of subjective evaluations of seal robot in Japan and UK. Robotics and Automation, 2003. Proceedings. ICRA’03. IEEE international conference on (Vol. 3, pp. 3152–3157). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
Stichting, S. (2007). www.steffie.nl, zo werkt het. http://steffie.nl. Accessed 3 Jan 2013.
Stiehl, W. D., Breazeal, C., Han, K. H., Lieberman, J., Lalla, L., Maymin, A., Salinas, J., et al. (2006). The huggable: A therapeutic robotic companion for relational, affective touch. ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 Emerging technologies, 15. In Proceedings of AAAI fall symposium on caring machines: AI in Eldercare, 2006, Washington.
UbiComp. (2014). Proceedings of the 2014 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing (pp. 62–74).
Takeuchi, A., & Naito, T. (1995). Situated facial displays: Towards social interaction. In I. Katz, R. Mack, L. Marks, M. B. Rosson, & J. Nielsen (Eds.), Human factors in computing systems: CHI + 95 conference proceedings (pp. 450–455). New York: ACM Press.
Teigen, K. H. (1994). Yerkes-Dodson: A law for all seasons. Theory & Psychology, 4(4), 525–547.
Tognazzini, B. (1992). TOG on interface. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Vinayagamoorthy, V., Gillies, M., Steed, A., Tanguy, E., Pan, X., Loscos, C., Slater, M., et al. (2006). Building expression into virtual characters. In Eurographics conference state of the art reports, Vienna, Austria, 4–8 September 2006 [Conference or Workshop Item]
Voerman, J. L., & FitzGerald, P. J. (2000). Deictic and emotive communication in animated pedagogical agents. In J. Cassell, J. Sullivan, S. Prevost, & E. L. Churchill (Eds.), Embodied conversational agents (p. 123). Cambridge: MIT Press.
von der Pütten, A., Krämer, N., & Gratch, J. (2010). How our personality shapes our interactions with virtual characters – Implications for research and development. In 10th International conference on intelligent virtual agents (pp. 208–221). Berlin/New York: Springer.
Vormbrock, J. K., & Grossberg, J. M. (1988). Cardiovascular effects of human-pet dog interactions. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 11(5), 509–517.
Wada, K., & Shibata, T. (2007). Living with seal robots—Its sociopsychological and physiological influences on the elderly at a care house. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 23(5), 972–980.
Walker, J. H., Sproull, L., & Subramani, R. (1994). Using a human face in an interface. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Celebrating interdependence (pp. 85–91). New York: ACM. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=191708
Werry, I., & Dautenhahn, K. (1999). Applying mobile robot technology to the rehabilitation of autistic children. In Proceedings of SIRS99, 7th symposium on intelligent robotic systems, p. 265.
Wethington, E., & Kessler, R. C. (1986). Perceived support, received support, and adjustment to stressful life events. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 27(1), 78–89.
Edney, A. T. (1995). Companion animals and human health: An overview. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 88(12), 704p–708p.
Wu, P., & Miller, C. (2005). Results from a field study: The need for an emotional relationship between the elderly and their assistive technologies. In 1st international conference on augmented cognition, Las Vegas.
Yee, N., Bailenson, J. N., & Rickertsen, K. (2007). A meta-analysis of the impact of the inclusion and realism of human-like faces on user experiences in interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–10). New York: ACM. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1240626
Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149(3681), 269–274.
Zunzunegui, M. V., Alvarado, B. E., Del Ser, T., & Otero, A. (2003). Social networks, social integration, and social engagement determine cognitive decline in community-dwelling Spanish older adults. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58(2), 93–100.
Acknowledgements
This work was partially funded by the GUIDE Project of the European Commission’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) under grant agreement 24889.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Noy, D., Ribeiro, P., Iurgel, I.A. (2015). Embodied Virtual Agents as a Means to Foster E-Inclusion of Older People. In: Biswas, P., Duarte, C., Langdon, P., Almeida, L. (eds) A Multimodal End-2-End Approach to Accessible Computing. Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6708-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6708-2_8
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6707-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6708-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)