Advertisement

The EU Energy Poverty and Vulnerability Agenda: An Emergent Domain of Transnational Action

  • Stefan Bouzarovski
  • S. Petrova
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Energy book series (LNEN, volume 28)

Abstract

This chapter explores the organisational and political complexities surrounding the adoption of energy poverty agendas and policies at the EU decision-making level. Theoretically, it is based on the literature on policy mobilities. Empirically, it engages in a triangulation of data from the secondary literature and interviews in various EU institutions. The analysis shows that agenda-shaping in the EU poverty domain has been mainly driven from above and has been highly contingent on attempts to ‘define’ and ‘identify’ the problem. There is little evidence to suggest that particular events or dynamics have provided a central impetus for European action in this domain. Only in recent years have energy poverty concerns started to enter mainstream EU policy agendas, principally as a result of the Commission’s efforts surrounding the implementation of the Third Energy Package.

Keywords

Energy Efficiency Energy Service Energy Efficiency Measure Energy Package Energy Bill 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Boardman, B. (2010). Fixing fuel poverty: Challenges and solutions. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  2. Bouzarovski, S. (2014). Energy poverty in the European Union: Landscapes of vulnerability. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, 3(3), 276–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bouzarovski, S., Petrova, S., & Sarlamanov, S. (2012). Energy poverty policies in the EU: A critical perspective. Energy Policy, 49, 76–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell, R. (1993). Fuel poverty and government response. Social Policy and Administration, 27, 58–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cobb, R. W., & Elder, C. D. (1983). Participation in American politics: The dynamics of agenda-building. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Council of Europe. (2008). Housing policy and vulnerable social groups. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  7. Dijol, J. (2010). Energy poverty: No mention at the Energy Council. Brussels: CECODHAS Housing Europe.Google Scholar
  8. EESC. (2012). EESC president argues for urgent EU action to eradicate energy poverty. Brussels: European Economic and Social Committee.Google Scholar
  9. ETUC. (2010). Resolution on energy strategy for Europe 2011–2020. Brussels: European Trade Union Confederation.Google Scholar
  10. EurActiv. (2010). EU to define vulnerable energy customers. Brussels: Euractiv.Google Scholar
  11. European Commission. (2010). An energy policy for consumers, commission staff working paper. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  12. European Commission. (2011). Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the council, the European social and economic committee and the committee for the regions. Energy roadmap 2050. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  13. European Parliament. (2009). Directive 2009/72/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 13 July 2009 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity and repealing Directive 2003/54/EC. Brussels: Official Journal of the European Union.Google Scholar
  14. European Parliament. (2010). Report on the revision of the energy efficiency action plan—A7-0331/2010. Brussels: European Parliament.Google Scholar
  15. European Parliament. (2013). Report on the energy roadmap 2050, a future with energy. Brussels: European Parliament.Google Scholar
  16. Hills, J. (2012). Getting the measure of fuel poverty: Final report of the fuel poverty review. London: School of Economics and Political Science—Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion.Google Scholar
  17. Latour, B. (1997). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. McCormick, J. (2001). Environmental policy in the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  19. McCann, E., & Ward, K. (2012). Policy assemblages, mobilities and mutations: Toward a multidisciplinary conversation. Political Studies Review, 10, 325–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Peck, J. (2011). Geographies of policy: From transfer-diffusion to mobility-mutation. Progress in Human Geography, 35, 773–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. The Parliament. (2012). MEPs call for action to combat energy poverty. MEPs call for action to combat energy poverty. Brussels: The Parliament Magazine.Google Scholar
  22. Tosun, J., & Solorio, I. (2011). Exploring the energy-environment relationship in the EU: Perspectives and challenges for theorizing and empirical analysis. European Integration Online Papers, 15, 1–15.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SEEDUniversity of Manchester, Arthur Lewis BuildingManchesterUK
  2. 2.Department of Economic GeographyUniversity of GdańskGdańskPoland

Personalised recommendations