Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Creative Engineering Design: The Meaning of Creativity and Innovation in Engineering

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Creativity and Innovation Among Science and Art

Abstract

The importance of creativity as a vehicle for innovation in engineering design is discussed in this chapter. A creative act needs acceptance of an idea, product, or process by the field, such as engineering and the domain such as science or Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM). Today’s engineers must be creative and innovative. The problems engineers facing today demand original thinking . To remain competitive globally, engineering firms rely on creative individuals and creative teams to develop new products for innovation. The Creative Engineering Design Assessment (CEDA) offers a new method for assessing creative engineering design. Unlike previous measures, the revised CEDA also measures Originality and Usefulness , which, to date, is a unique component when compared to other general creativity and engineering creativity measures. Creative design and its measurement may act as a catalyst to increase enrollment in STEM. Through prioritizing creativity and innovation, as we did with prioritizing scientific creativity in the 1950s, we can enhance global prosperity, not only for the United States of America (USA) but also for other countries around the world.

The word “engineer” comes from the Latin “Ingeniatorum” meaning “ingenious” with “gen” Referring to Creation, the act of Creation or “Genesis” The essence of the words “creativity” “create” and “engineer” Stem from the act of creation.

Creativity is no longer an optional accessory. Instead, creativity is a necessity for innovation and prosperity, especially now during our current global and economic times. Creativity and innovation are vital in the United States of America, the Americas, Europe, Asia and the entire world, especially now in our current era.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baillie, C., & Walker, P. (1998). Fostering creative thinking to student engineers. European Journal of Engineering Education, 23(1), 35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodner, G. M., & Guay, R. B. (1997). The Purdue visualization of rotations test. The Chemical Educator, 2(4), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branoff, T. J. (2000). Spatial visualization measurement: A modification of the purdue spatial visualization test—visualization of rotations. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 64(2), 14–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brower, T., Grimsley, R., & Newberry, P. (2007). Stem is not just a four individually lettered word. In 114th Annual ASEE Conference and Exposition, June 24, 2007–June 27,2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burleson, W. (2005). Developing creativity, motivation, and self-actualization with learning systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 63(4–5), 436–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. S., Larussa, M. A., & Bodner, G. M. (1987). A study of two measures of spatial ability as predictors of success in different levels of general chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(7), 645–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charyton, C. (2005). Creativity (scientific, artistic, general) and risk tolerance among engineering and music students (Doctoral Dissertation, Temple University, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Charyton, C. (2008). Creativity (scientific, artistic, general) and risk tolerance among engineering and music students. Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM Verlag Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charyton, C., & Snelbecker, G. E. (2007). General, artistic and scientific creativity attributes of engineering and music students. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 213–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charyton, C., & Merrill, J. A. (2009). Assessing general creativity and creative engineering design in first year engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(2), 145–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charyton, C., Jagacinski, R. J., & Merrill, J. A. (2008). CEDA: A research instrument for creative engineering design assessment. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(3), 147–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charyton, C., Jagacinski, R. J., Merrill, J. A., Clifton, W., & Dedios, S. (2011). Assessing creativity specific to engineering with the revised creative engineering design assessment (CEDA). Journal of Engineering Education, 100(4), 778–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiaans, H., & Venselaar, K. (2005). Creativity in design engineering and the role of knowledge: Modelling the expert. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 15(3), 217–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, I., & Salustri, F. A. (2010). Evaluating design project creativity in engineering design courses. CEEA2010: Inaugural Conference of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (pp. 1–6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockton, G. (2008). Designing worth: Connecting preferred means to desired ends. Interactions, 15(4): 54–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, D., & Cropley, A. (2005). Engineering creativity: A systems concept of functional creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (pp. 169–185). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deal, W. F. (2001 April) Imagineering: Designing robots imaginatively and creatively. Reston: The Technology Teacher, 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feist, G. J. (1999). The influence of personality on artistic and scientific creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 273–296). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felder, R. M., Woods, D. R., Stice, J. E., & Rugarcia, A. (2000). The future of engineering education. II. Teaching methods that work. Chemical Engineering Education, 34(1), 26–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, E. S. (1992). Engineering and the mind’s eye. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1996). Creative cognition: Theory, research and applications. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleisig, R., Mahler, H., & Mahalec, V. (2009). Engineering design in the creative age. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 14, 2009–June 17, 2009, BOEING.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2005). America’s looming creativity crisis. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 33(1), 105–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, N. S. (2008). A module to foster engineering creativity: An interpolative design problem and an extrapolative research project. Chemical Engineering Education, 42(4), 166–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forging a Path for Today’s Engineers: More outsourcing, a more diversified workload and more money for engineers in 2007. Design News, July 16, 2007, p. 62. http://www.designnews.com/document.asp?doc_id=217539&dfpPParams=aid_217539&dfpLayout=article.

  • Ghosh, S. (1993). An exercise in inducing creativity in undergraduate engineering students through challenging examinations and open-ended design problems. IEEE Transactions on Education, 36(1), 113–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, G., & Smolkov, M. (2006). Variances in the impact of visual stimuli on design problem solving performance. Design Studies, 27, 549–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, H. G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the adjective check list. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1398–1405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, H. G. (1992). Assessment of creative potential in psychology and the development of a creative temperament scale for the CPI. In J. C. Rosen & P. McReynolds (Eds.), Advances in psychology assessment (pp. 225–257). New York, NY: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grandin, T. (2006). Thinking in pictures: My life with autism. New York, NY: Random House Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guay, R. B. (1978). Factors affecting spatial test performance: Sex, handedness, birth order, and experience. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guay, R. B. (1980). Spatial ability measurement: A critique and an alternative. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1984). Varieties of divergent thinking. Journal of Creative Behavior, 19, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harriger, B., French, M., Aikens, M., & Shade, S. (2008). Using guitar manufacturing to recruit students into stem disciplines. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 22, 2008–June 24, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawlader, M. N. A., & Poo, A. N. (1989). Development of creative and innovative talents of students. The International Journal of Applied Engineering Education, 5(3), 331–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishii, N., & Miwa, K. (2004). Creativity education based on participants’ reflective thinking on their creative processes. Transactions of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, 19(2), 126–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishii, N., & Miwa, K. (2005). Supporting reflective practice in creativity education. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Creativity & Cognition. London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito, H., Fujimoto, H., Sakuramoto, I., Ishida, K., Kaneshige, A., Kadowaki, S., & Murakami, H. (2003, December). Practical education for students to enable to make a product creatively. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Agile Manufacturing, Advances in Agile Manufacturing, ICAM (pp. 645–650).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. (1995). Company succeeds thanks to the creativity of its engineers. Design News, p. 59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, S., & Pereira, N. (2009). Rube goldbergineering: Lessons in teaching engineering design to future engineers. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 14, 2009–June 17, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, A., Chung, S., & Ku, J. (2011). A study on the effective lesson plan of creative engineering design education for the creativity improvement of the students of engineering college. Proceedings of the 3rd International Mega-Conference on Future-Generation Information Technology, FGIT 2011, in Conjunction with GDC 2011, December 8, 2011–December 10, 2011, 7105 LNCS pp. 108–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2005). Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, B., Towle, E., Hwang, G., O’Brien, E. J., Bauer, C. F., & Onyancha, R. M. (2007). Examining industry perspectives related to legacy data and technology toolset implementation. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 71(3), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovac, R. J. (1989). The validation of selected spatial ability tests via correlational assessment and analysis of user-processing strategy. Educational Research Quarterly, 13(2), 26–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, M. C., Thomas, B., & Leviness, P. O. (1999). Assessing the creativity of engineers. Design engineering division: Successes in engineering design education, design engineering, 102, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawshe, C. H., & Harris, D. H. (1960). Manual of instructions to accompany purdue creativity test forms G and H. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahboub, K. C., Portillo, M. B., Liu, Y., & Chadranratna, S. (2004). Measuring and enhancing creativity. European Journal of Engineering Education, 29(3), 429–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDougnel, W., & Braungart, N. (2002). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. New York, NY: North Point Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, G.H. (1969). SMOG grading: A new reading formula. Journal of Reading 12(8): 639–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, R. S. (1999). Enhancing creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 392–430). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 607–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens, W. A. (1960). The Owens Creativity Test. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J. A., & Renzulli, J. S. (1999). Psychometric approaches to the study of human creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 35–61). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redelinghuys, C. (2001). Proposed measures for invention gain an engineering design. Journal of Engineering Design, 11, 245–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. S., & Morgan, R. F. (1990). Reading to learn in the content areas. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riffe, W. J. (1985). Creativity—catalyst for education. Motor vehicle technology: Mobility for prosperity (pp. 589–593).

    Google Scholar 

  • Romeike, R. (2006, February). Creative students: What can we learn from them for teaching computer science?. In Proceedings of the 6th Baltic Sea conference on Computing education research: Koli Calling 2006 (pp. 149-150).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roszkowski, M. J., Snelbecker, G. E., & Leimberg, S. R. (1989). Risk tolerance and risk aversion. In S. R. Leimberg (Ed.), The tools and techniques of financial planning. Cincinnati: The National Underwriter Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, F. (2004). Learning engineering as art: An invention center. International Journal of Engineering Education, 20(5), 809–819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, A., & Gann, D. (2003). Sources of ideas for innovation in engineering design. Research Policy, 32(8), 1309–1324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scribner, S. A., & Anderson, M. A. (2005). Novice drafters’ spatial visualization development: Influence of instructional methods and individual learning styles. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 42(2), 38–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, J. J., Smith, S. M., & Vargas-Hernandez, N. (2003). Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design Studies, 24(2), 111–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creativity: Cognitive, personal, developmental and social aspects. American Psychologist, 55(1), 151–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snelbecker, G. E., Roszkowski, M. J., & Cutler, N. E. (1990). Investors’ risk tolerance and return aspirations, and financial advisors’ interpretations: A conceptual model and exploratory data. Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19, 377–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soibelman, L., & Peña-Mora, F. (2000). Distributed multi-reasoning mechanism to support conceptual structural design. Journal of Structural Engineering, 126, 733–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorby, S. A., & Baartmans, B. J. (1996). A course for the development of 3-D spatial visualization skills. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 60(1), 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2001). What is the common thread of creativity? its dialectical relation to intelligence and wisdom. American Psychologist, 56(4), 360–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concepts of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, P. D. (2005). Creativity from constraints: The psychology of breakthrough. New York, NY: Springer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stouffer, W., Russell, J. S., & Oliva, M. G. (2004). Making the strange familiar: Creativity and the future of engineering education. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulzbach, C. (2007). Enhancing engineering education? Concrete canoe competition. 114th Annual ASEE Conference and Exposition, 2007, June 24, 2007–June 27, 2007, Dassault Systemes; HP; Lockheed Martin; IBM; DuPont; et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, G., & Lordan, M. (1999). A review of creativity principles applied to engineering design. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers—Part E—Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering, 213(1), 17–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking. Lexington, MA: Personnel Press/Ginn and Co./Xerox Education Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velegol, D. (2014). Creative spark. Prism, February, pp. 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma, A. K. (2011). Attracting K-12 students towards engineering disciplines with project based learning modules. 118th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 26, 2011–June 29, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waks, S., & Merdler, M. (2003). Creative thinking of practical engineering students during a design project. Research in Science and Technological Education, 21(1), 101–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, R. W. (1999). Creativity and knowledge: A challenge to theories. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 226–250). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasin, R. M., Mustapha, R., & Zaharim, A. (2009). Promoting creativity through problem oriented project based learning in engineering education at Malaysian polytechnics: Issues and challenges. 8th WSEAS International Conference on Education and Educational Technology, EDU ‘09, October 17, 2009–October 19, 2009, 253-258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yue, J., & Chen, D.M. (2001). Does CAD improve spatial visualization ability? Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Albuquerque, NM.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank all of the following in a “we” format since so many people helped make this work possible. We are appreciative to all of the people that have helped out with this research. Thank you to William Clifton, Samantha DeDios, Stephanie Bennett, Thornton Lothrop, Mark Miller, Jean Wheasler, Laurin Turowski, Ankit Tayal, TJ Starr, Berae McClary, and Jong-Hun Sun. We would also like to thank Jong-Hun Sun, Mike Interiano, Myroslava Mudrak, Kelly Tung-Steudler, Saebyul Lee, Magda Kolcio, and Martin Mueller for translations of the CEDA into other languages. We would also like to thank Richard Jagacinski, John A. Merrill, the Snelbecker Family in memory of Glenn E. Snelbecker, and Yosef Alam for their feedback on earlier versions and revised versions of the CEDA. We also thank Mohammed Rahman for statistical consultation as well as Shane Ruland, Larry Campbell, Paul Jones, and Marc Archuleta for their technical assistance and expertise regarding this project. Additional gratitude goes to Blaine Lilly and Glenn Elliott for their initial feedback and technological support, respectively, in the development of the first version of the CEDA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA

    Christine Charyton

Authors
  1. Christine Charyton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine Charyton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Blacklick, Ohio, USA

    Christine Charyton

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Charyton, C. (2015). Creative Engineering Design: The Meaning of Creativity and Innovation in Engineering. In: Charyton, C. (eds) Creativity and Innovation Among Science and Art. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6624-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6624-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6623-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6624-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation