Exposing an Economic Development Policy Clash: Predictability and Control Versus Creativity and Innovation

Chapter

Abstract

The last four decades have witnessed increasing research, policy discourse and the investment in government programs to foster innovation within the private sector manufacturing and service industries. Despite the adoption by many governments of the language of complexity theory and systems thinking in business and organisational management, and a growing awareness of the breadth of contexts and outcomes resulting from the innovation process, a broader commitment to investments in supporting skills development and capacity building for service innovation in businesses have yet to catch up. This chapter examines the factors that have contributed to the perpetuation of a limited conceptualisation of the forms in which innovation contributes economic value, and the government policy instruments invested into foster and sustain a diverse regional innovation system. This tangle of academic discourse, policy rhetoric and government programs aimed to support innovation will be examined through a case study of South Australia’s strategic plan and the agencies charged with fostering and supporting innovation in the state.

Keywords

Innovation policy Organisational culture Discourse analysis Endogenous growth theory (EGT) Evidence-based policy making (EBPM) 

References

  1. Amidon D, Macnamara D (2001) 7 C’s of Knowledge LeadershipGoogle Scholar
  2. Markusen A (1999) Fuzzy concepts scanty evidence, policy distance: the case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies. Reg Stud 33(9):869–884Google Scholar
  3. Baum F (1999) Social capital—is it good for your health? J Epidemiol Commun Heal (April 1999)Google Scholar
  4. Brunner RD (1992) The policy movement as a policy problem. In: Dunn W, Kelly R (eds) Advances in policy studies since 1950. Transaction Publishers, New BrunswickGoogle Scholar
  5. Bryson J, Roering W (1987) Applying private-sector strategic planning in the public sector. J Am Plan Assoc 53(1):9–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carlsson B (2004) The digital economy: what is new and what is not? Struct Change Econ Dyn 15(3):245–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Castles F (1990) The Dynamics of Policy Change: What Happened to the English-speaking Nations in the.Google Scholar
  8. Cutler & Company Pty Ltd (2008) Venturous Australia ReportGoogle Scholar
  9. Department of the Premier and Cabinet (2004) South Australian Strategic Plan: Creating Opportunity, from www.stateplan.sa.gov.au
  10. Dryzek J (2001) Legitimacy and economy in deliberative democracy. Polit Theor 29(5):651–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dvir R, Pasher E (2004) Innovation Engines For Knowledge Cities: an innovation ecology perspective. J Knowl Manag 8(5):16–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Economic Development Board (2003) A framework for economic development in South Australia. Government of South Australia, AdelaideGoogle Scholar
  13. Edquist C (1997) Systems of Innovation: Technologies. Institutions and Organisations, Pinter, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Eisner M (1993) Regulatory Politics in Transition. John Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  15. Eisner M (1994) Discovering Patterns in Regulatory History: Continuity, Change and Regulatory Regimes. Journal of Policy History 6(2):157–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fischer F (2003) Beyond empiricism: policy analysis as delberative practice. In: Hajer M, Wagenaar H (eds) Deliberative policy analysis: understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 209–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Godin B (2006) The knowledge-based economy: conceptual framework or buzzword? J Technol Transf 31(Number 1):17–30Google Scholar
  18. Green R (2009a) Australia’s knowledge-based future - how innovation policy can create long-term growth and jobs: UTS Faculty of BusinessGoogle Scholar
  19. Green R (2009b) Creating Australia s knowledge-based future. Think.Change.Do, October 16Google Scholar
  20. Green R, Agarwal R, Hall J (2009) Does Management Matter? Australian management practices research project. Paper presented at the RACMA -09. from www.racma.edu.au
  21. Greif A (1994) Cultural Beliefs and the Organization of Society: A Historical and Theoretical Reflection on Collectivist and Individualist Societies, The Journal of Political Economy 102:912-950Google Scholar
  22. Hajer M (1993) Discourse Coalitions and the Institutionalization of practice: the case of acid rain in Britian. In: Fischer F, Forester J (eds) The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Duke University Press, Durham and LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Hajer M, Wagenaar H (eds) (2003) Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  24. Harris R, Milkis S (1989) The Politics of Regulatory Change. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Henton D, Melville J, Walesh K(1997) Grassroots leaders for a new economy: how civic entrepreneurs are building prosperous communities. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  26. Herrington J, Reeves T, Oliver Ron (2009) A guide to authentic e-learning. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Howard J (2008) Between a hard rock and a soft space: design, creative practice and innovation, A background paper prepared for the national innovation review, CHASS Occasional paper No 5. Council for Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences (CHASS), CanberraGoogle Scholar
  28. Howlett M, Lindquist E (2004) Teaching policy analysis: policy styles and their implications for training policy analysts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Political Science AssociationGoogle Scholar
  29. Lagendijk A (1997) Will new regionalism survive? Tracing dominant concepts in economic geography. (Version 2nd Rev Version 2003) CURDS, Newcastle upon Tyne, UKGoogle Scholar
  30. Dodgson M, Hughes A, Foster S, Metcalfe J (2011) Systems thinking, market failure, and the development of innovation policy: the case of Australia. Res Policy 40(9):1145–1156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Di Francesco M (2001) Process not outcomes in new public management? Policy coherence in Australian Government. Draw Board: An Aust Rev Publ Aff 1(3):103–116Google Scholar
  32. Mintzberg H (1994) The fall and rise of strategic planning. Harv Bus Rev 72(1):107Google Scholar
  33. Nelson R, Winter S (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  34. Nijssen, Bas, Vermeulen, Kemp (2006) Exploring product and service innovation similarities and differences. Int J Res Mark 23(3):241–251Google Scholar
  35. OECD (1996) The knowledge based economy. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  36. OECD (2001) Citries and regionsin the new learning economy. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  37. Osborne D, Gaebler T (1992) Reinventing government : how the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector / Reinventing government : how the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Addison-Wesley Publishing, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  38. Radin B (2000) Beyond Machiavelli: Policy Analysis Comes of Age. Georgetown University Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  39. Raspe O, Van Oort F (2006) The knowledge economy and urban economic growth. Eur Plan Stud 14(9):1209–1234Google Scholar
  40. Roos G (2012) Manufacturing into the Future. In: Program ATiR (ed) Government of South Australia, AdelaideGoogle Scholar
  41. Roos G, Fernström L, Gupta O (2005) National Innovation Systems: Finland, Sweden & Australia Compared: learnings for Australia. In: Report prepared for the Australian Business Foundation, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  42. Oughton C, Landabasco M, Morgan K (2002) The regional innovation Paradox: Innovation policy and industrial policy. J Technol Transf 27:97–110Google Scholar
  43. Parsons W (2002) From muddling through to muddling up - evidence based policy making and the modernisation of british government. Publ Polic Admin 17(3):43–60Google Scholar
  44. Pavitt K (1984) Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: towards a taxonomy, Research Policy. No. 13:343–373Google Scholar
  45. Potter J, Wetherell M (1987) Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London SageGoogle Scholar
  46. NYC Departments of Planning (2013) Design and construction, and health and mental hygiene. Shaping Sidewalks, Active Design SupplementGoogle Scholar
  47. Quinn R (1988) Beyond rational management: mastering the paradoxes and competing demands of high performance. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  48. Quinn R, Rohrbaugh J (1983) A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Manage Sci 29(3):363–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Reenen J (2001) The new economy: reality and policy. Fiscal Stud 22(3):307–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Reich R (ed) (1988) The power of public ideas. Ballinger Publishing Company, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  51. Buchanan R (1992) Wicked problems in design thinking. Des Issues 8(2):5–21MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rogers PS, Hildebrandt H (1993) Competing values instruments for analyzing written and spoken management messages. Hum Resour Manage 32(1):121–142, 122Google Scholar
  53. Romer P (1990) Endogenous technological change. J Polit Econ 98(5):1002–1037Google Scholar
  54. Romer P (1993) Ideas and things: the concept of production is being re-tooled. The Economist September 11:70–72Google Scholar
  55. Romer P (1994) The origins of endogenous growth. J Econ Perspect 8(1):3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Romer P (2007) Economic growth. In: Henderson D (ed) The concise encyclopedia of economics (Vol.). Liberty FundGoogle Scholar
  57. Schein Edgar H (1992) Organizational culture and leadership (2nd ed) Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  58. Sporer Z, Bhatia B (2004) Comparing innovation and commercialization activites in Knowledge-based societies. Paper presented at the Innovation and development in knowledge-based society/economy. Retrieved Sept 2007, from www.business.unisa.edu.au/cid
  59. Talbot C (2003) Measuring public value a competing values approach. In: Herbert Simon Institute Manchester Business School (ed) The Work Foundation, LondonGoogle Scholar
  60. Webb C (2000) Knowledge-Based Industries, DSTI/EAS/IND/SWP (2000) 5. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  61. Webb C (2001) Knowledge-Based Industries, DSTI/EAS/IND/SWP (2001) 13. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  62. Woolcock M (1998) Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theor Soc (27):151–208Google Scholar
  63. Yanow D (2000) Conducting interperative policy analysis. Sage University Paper Series (Vol. 47) Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Art Architecture and DesignUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations