Skip to main content

Constriction Ring Syndrome

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Disorders of the Hand

Abstract

Constriction ring syndrome is a rare condition of unknown etiology. Numerous names have been used to describe this entity in the past including annular band syndrome, constriction band syndrome, Streeter dysplasia, Torpin dysplasia, amniotic band disruption sequence, acrosyndactyly, fenestrated syndactyly and congenital amputation syndrome [1]. The syndrome is characterized by bands of ranging severity, always present at birth, that can affect any part of the body with a particular predilection for the upper or lower extremities [2].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Upton J. Constriction ring syndrome. In: Mathes SJ, editor. Plastic surgery. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2006. p. 185–213.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Patterson TJ. Congenital ring-constrictions. Br J Plast Surg. 1961;14:1–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Garza A, Cordero JF, Mulinare J. Epidemiology of the early amnion rupture spectrum of defects. Am J Dis Child. 1988;142(5):541–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Froster UG, Baird PA. Amniotic band sequence and limb defects: data from a population-based study. Am J Med Genet. 1993;46(5):497–500 [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Foulkes GD, Reinker K. Congenital constriction band syndrome: a seventy-year experience. J Pediatr Orthop. 1994;14(2):242–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Houben JJ. Immediate and delayed effects of oligohydramnios on limb development in the rat: chronology and specificity. Teratology. 1984;30(3):403–11 [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wiedrich TA. Congenital constriction band syndrome. Hand Clin. 1998;14(1):29–38 [Review].

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Montgomery WF. Observations on the spontaneous amputation of limbs of the fetus in utero, with an attempt too explain the occasional cause of its production. Dublin Med Chem Sci J. 1832;1:140–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Streeter G. Focal deficiencies in fetal tissues and their relation to intrauterine amputation. Contrib Embryol. 1930;22:1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Light TR, Ogden JA. Congenital constriction band syndrome. Pathophysiology and treatment. Yale J Biol Med. 1993;66(3):143–55 [Historical Article].

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Torpin R. Amniochorionic mesoblastic fibrous strings and amnionic bands: associated constricting fetal malformations or fetal death. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1965;91:65–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jones MC. The spectrum of structural defects produced as a result of amnion rupture. Semin Perinatol. 1983;7(4):281–4 [Case Reports].

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Browne D. The pathology of congenital ring constrictions. Arch Dis Child. 1957;32(166):517–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Upton J, Tan C. Correction of constriction rings. J Hand Surg Am. 1991;16(5):947–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Baker CJ, Rudolph AJ. Congenital ring constrictions and intrauterine amputations. Am J Dis Child. 1971;121(5):393–400.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Upton J. Treatment of congenital forearm and hand anomalies. In: May JW, Littler JW, editors. Hand. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1990. p. 5352–6.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Torpin R, Faulkner A. Intrauterine amputation with the missing member found in the fetal membranes. JAMA. 1966;198(2):185–7 [Case Reports].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rayan GM. Ectopic implantation of constriction band intrauterine digital amputation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107(4):1000–2 [Case Reports].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Inoue G, Inagaki Y. Extra digit arising from the forearm. J Hand Surg Am. 1991;16(4):650–2 [Case Reports].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Uchida Y, Sugioka Y. Peripheral nerve palsy associated with congenital constriction band syndrome. J Hand Surg Br. 1991;16(1):109–12 [Case Reports].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Weeks PM. Radial, median, and ulnar nerve dysfunction associated with a congenital constricting band of the arm. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982;69(2):333–6 [Case Reports].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tadmor OP, Kreisberg GA, Achiron R, Porat S, Yagel S. Limb amputation in amniotic band syndrome: serial ultrasonographic and Doppler observations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997;10(5):312–5 [Case Reports].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kino Y. Clinical and experimental studies of the congenital constriction band syndrome, with an emphasis on its etiology. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975;57(5):636–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hall EJ, Johnson-Giebink R, Vasconez LO. Management of the ring constriction syndrome: a reappraisal. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982;69(3):532–6 [Case Reports].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Weinzweig N. Constriction band-induced vascular compromise of the foot: classification and management of the “intermediate” stage of constriction-ring syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;96(4):972–7 [Case Reports].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Coady MS, Moore MH, Wallis K. Amniotic band syndrome: the association between rare facial clefts and limb ring constrictions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;101(3):640–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Malpas T, Anderson N, Langley S. Ulnar club-hand and constriction-ring syndrome. Pediatr Radiol. 1995;25(3):233–4 [Case Reports].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. DeMyer W, Baird I. Mortality and skeletal malformations from amniocentesis and oligohydramnios in rats: cleft palate, clubfoot, microstomia, and adactyly. Teratology. 1969;2(1):33–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Keller H, Neuhauser G, Durkin-Stamm MV, Kaveggia EG, Schaaff A, Sitzmann F. “ADAM complex” (amniotic deformity, adhesions, mutilations)–a pattern of craniofacial and limb defects. Am J Med Genet. 1978;2(1):81–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Van Allen MI, Curry C, Walden CE, Gallagher L, Patten RM. Limb-body wall complex: II. Limb and spine defects. Am J Med Genet. 1987;28(3):549–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kuster W, Lenz W, Kaariainen H, Majewski F. Congenital scalp defects with distal limb anomalies (Adams-Oliver syndrome): report of ten cases and review of the literature. Am J Med Genet. 1988;31(1):99–115 [Case Reports Review].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Moran SL, Jensen M, Bravo C. Amniotic band syndrome of the upper extremity: diagnosis and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15(7):397–407 [Review].

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Blauth W, Gekeler J. Morphology and classification of symbrachydactylia. Handchirurgie. 1971;3(4):123–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Upton J. Management of transverse and longitudinal deficiencies (failure of formation). In: Mathes SJ, editor. Plastic surgery. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2006. p. 51–137.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Glicenstein J, Pennecot GF, Duhamel B. Poland’s syndrome. 17 new cases. Ann Chir Plast. 1974;19(1):47–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ireland DC, Takayama N, Flatt AE. Poland’s syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58(1):52–8 [Case Reports].

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Cham PM, Drolet BA, Segura AD, Esterly NB. Congenital Volkmann ischaemic contracture: a case report and review. Br J Dermatol. 2004;150(2):357–63 [Case Reports Review].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Trice M, Colwell CW. A historical review of compartment syndrome and Volkmann’s ischemic contracture. Hand Clin. 1998;14(3):335–41 [Historical Article].

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Swanson AB. Congenital limb defects classification and treatment. Clin Symp. 1981;33(3):1–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ogino T, Saitou Y. Congenital constriction band syndrome and transverse deficiency. J Hand Surg Br. 1987;12(3):343–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Hill LM, Kislak S, Jones N. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of a forearm constriction band. J Ultrasound Med. 1988;7(5):293–5 [Case Reports].

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Flatt AE. The care of congenital hand anomalies. 2nd ed. St Louis: Quality Medical Publishing; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Bernal E, Oeltjen JC. Constriction ring syndrome. J Craniofac Surg. 2009;20(4):1018–20 [Review].

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Pedersen TK, Thomsen SG. Spontaneous resolution of amniotic bands. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;18(6):673–4 [Case Reports].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Ronderos-Dumit D, Briceno F, Navarro H, Sanchez N. Endoscopic release of limb constriction rings in utero. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2006;21(3):255–8 [Case Reports].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Sentilhes L, Verspyck E, Eurin D, Ickowicz V, Patrier S, Lechevallier J, et al. Favourable outcome of a tight constriction band secondary to amniotic band syndrome. Prenat Diagn. 2004;24(3):198–201 [Case Reports].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Quintero RA, Morales WJ, Phillips J, Kalter CS, Angel JL. In utero lysis of amniotic bands. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997;10(5):316–20 [Case Reports].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Blackfield HM, Hause DP. Congenital constricting bands of the extremities. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1951;8(2):101–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Stevenson TW. Release of circular constricting scar by Z flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1946;1:39–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Di Meo L, Mercer DH. Single-stage correction of constriction ring syndrome. Ann Plast Surg. 1987;19(5):469–74 [Case Reports].

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Greene WB. One-stage release of congenital circumferential constriction bands. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75(5):650–5 [Case Reports].

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Muguti GI. The amniotic band syndrome: single-stage correction. Br J Plast Surg. 1990;43(6):706–8 [Case Reports].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Lister G, Scheker L. The role of microsurgery in the reconstruction of congenital deformities of the hand. Hand Clin. 1985;1(3):431–42 [Review].

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Foucher G, Greant P, Merle M, Michon J. Congenital abnormalities of the thumb. Contribution of microsurgical technics. Chirurgie. 1988;114(1):60–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Gilbert A. Toe transfers for congenital hand defects. J Hand Surg Am. 1982;7(2):118–24 [Case Reports].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Kay SP, Wiberg M, Bellew M, Webb F. Toe to hand transfer in children. Part 2: functional and psychological aspects. J Hand Surg Br. 1996;21(6):735–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Kay SP, Wiberg M. Toe to hand transfer in children. Part 1: technical aspects. J Hand Surg Br. 1996;21(6):723–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Bellew M, Haworth J, Kay SP. Toe to hand transfer in children: ten year follow up of psychological aspects. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64(6):766–75 [Comparative Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Matev I. Distraction method in the restoration of the thumb. Ortop Travmatol Protez. 1973;34(6):43–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Kessler I, Baruch A, Hecht O. Experience with distraction lengthening of digital rays in congenital anomalies. J Hand Surg Am. 1977;2(5):394–401 [Case Reports].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Seitz WH, Shimko P, Patterson RW. Long-term results of callus distraction lengthening in the hand and upper extremity for traumatic and congenital skeletal deficiencies. J Bone Joint Surg. 2010;92 Suppl 2:47–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Fultz CW, Lester DK, Hunter JM. Single stage lengthening by intercalary bone graft in patients with congenital hand deformities. J Hand Surg Br. 1986;11(1):40–6 [Case Reports].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Ogino T, Kato H, Ishii S, Usui M. Digital lengthening in congenital hand deformities. J Hand Surg Br. 1994;19(1):120–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Smith MBBS, FRCS .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sivakumar, B., Smith, P. (2015). Constriction Ring Syndrome. In: Trail, I., Fleming, A. (eds) Disorders of the Hand. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6563-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6563-7_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6562-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6563-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics