Skip to main content

The Perception of the Centre of Elastic Force Fields: A Model of Integration of the Force and Position Signals

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multisensory Softness

Part of the book series: Springer Series on Touch and Haptic Systems ((SSTHS))

Abstract

Softness perception offers a good opportunity to study how position and force information are integrated during exploratory movements. This chapter presents a model of how this integration might happen when identifying the central position of a very weak elastic force field rendered with a haptic device. In this task, the force near the central position of the force field is below the perceptual threshold. The participant needs to explore the force field actively to identify its central position. The model predicts both the systematic and variable errors observed in this task. It also yields an estimate of the lowest force that can be sensed and suggests that the underlying processes are affected by at least two noise sources that reflect limits in our force and position sensing abilities. An implication of the existence of a force threshold for softness perception is that the perceived stiffness of very soft material might be overestimated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    An alternative view is to conceptualize the processes yielding a sensation as intrinsically noisy (Thurstone 1927). In this case, the sensation elicited by the stimulus is modeled as a random variable while the threshold is assumed to be fixed. Moreover, the response variability arises from the fluctuations of the sensation instead of the threshold. The two threshold models are not distinguishable empirically without making additional assumptions. Depending on the view, the response variability can therefore be interpreted either as quantifying the variability of the threshold or the amount of noise in the sensory channel (Gescheider 1997; Macmillan and Creelman 2005).

References

  • Baud-Bovy G, Gatti E (2010a) Hand-held object force direction identification thresholds at rest and during movement. In: Kappers AML et al (eds) Haptics: generating and perceiving tangible sensations. Proceedings of the international euroHaptics 2010 conference. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 6192, pp 231–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Baud-Bovy G, Gatti E (2010b) The contribution of proprioception and touch to the perception of weak forces: preliminary results. in: Proceedings of the 26th meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics, Fechner’s Day, Padova, Italy, 19–22 Oct, pp 599–603

    Google Scholar 

  • Baud-Bovy G, Schochia L (2009) Is mass invariant? Effects of movement amplitude and duration. In: Proceedings of 25th Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics, Fechner’s Day, Galway, Ireland, 21–24 Oct, pp 369–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauregard GL, Srinivasan, MA, Durlach NI (1995) The manual resolution of viscosity and mass. In: Proceedings of the ASME dynamic systems and control division, DSC-vol 57–2, IMECE, pp 657–662

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann Tiest WM, Kappers AML (2008) Kinaesthetic and cutaneous cotributions to the perception of compressibility. In: Ferre M (ed) Haptics: perception, devices and scenarios. Proceedings of the international euroHaptics 2008 conference. Lectures notes in computer science, vol 5024, pp 255–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Bocca F, Baud-Bovy G (2009) A model of perception of the central point of elastic force fields. In: Proceedings of 3rd joint EuroHaptics conference and symposium on haptic interfaces for virtual environment and teleoperator systems, Salt-Lake City, USA, pp 576-581

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodie E, Ross HE (1984) Jiggling a lifted weight does aid discrimination. Am J Psychol 98(30):469–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Luca M, Knorlein B, Ernst MO, Harders M (2011) Effects of visual-haptic asynchronies and loading-unloading movements on compliance perception. Brain Res Bull 85:245–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gescheider GA (1997) Psychophysics: the fundamentals, 3rd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson J (1962) Observations on active touch. Psychol Rev 69(6):477–491

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gurari N, Baud-Bovy G (2014) Customization, control, and characterization of a commercial haptic device for high-fidelity rendering of weak forces. J Neurosci Methods (in revision)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones LA, Hunter IW (1993) A perceptual analysis of viscosity. Exp Brain Res 94:343–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones LA (1986) Perception of force and weight: theory and research. Psychol Bull 100(1):29–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klatzky RL, Lederman S (1995) Identifying objects from a haptic glance. Percep Psychophys 57(8):1111–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence DA (1993) Stability and transparency in bilateral tele-operation. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 9(5):624–637

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman SJ, Klatsky RL (1987) Hand movements: a window into haptic object recognition. Cogn Psychol 19:342–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL (2009) Haptic perception: a tutorial. Attention Percep Psychophys 71(7):1439–1459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macmillan NA, Creelman CD (2005) Detection theory, a user’s guide, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associate, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisky I, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Karniel A (2008) A regression and boundary-crossing-based model for the perception of delayed stiffness. IEEE Transations on Haptics 1:7382

    Google Scholar 

  • Parietti F, Baud-Bovy G, Gatti E, Riener R, Guzzella L, Vallery H (2011) Series viscoelastic actuators can match human force perception. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 16(5):853–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressman A, Welty LJ, Karniel A, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (2007) Perception of delayed stiffness. Int J Robot Res 26:1191–1203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressman A, Karniel A, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (2011) Perceptual localization and assessment of rigidity. J Neurosci 31(17):6595–6604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross HE, Brodie E, Benson AJ (1984) Mass discrimination during prolonged weightlessness. Science 225:219–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross HE, Brodie EE (1987) Weber fractions for weight and mass as a function of stimulus intensity. Q J Exp Psychol 39A:77–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury C, Gillespie RB, Tan H, Barbagli F, Salisbury JK (2009) Effects of haptic device attributes on vibration detection thresholds. In: Third joint eurohaptics conference and symposium on haptic interfaces for virtual environment and teleoperator systems (world haptics). pp 115–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan MA, LaMotte RH (1995) Tactual discrimination of softness. J Neurophysiol 73(1):88–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivisan MA, LaMotte RH (1996) Tactual discrimination of softness: abilities and mechanisms. In: FranzĂ©n O, Johansson R, Terenius LY (eds) Somesthesis and the neurobiology of the somatosensory cortex, Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, pp 123–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherrington CS (1900) The muscular sense. In: Schafer EA (ed) Textbook of Physiology vol 2. Pentland, Edinburgh, pp 1002–1025

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone LL (1927) Psychophysical analysis. Am J Psychol 38(3):368–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan HZ, Durlach NI, Beauregard GL, Srinivasan MA (1995) Manual discrimination of compliance using active pinch grasp: the role of force and work cues. Percep Psychophys 57(4):495–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber EH (1834) The sense of touch. Academic Press, London (Original work published 1834)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijntjes MWA, Sato A, Hayward V, Kappers AML (2009) Local surface orientation dominates haptic curvature discrimination. IEEE Trans Haptics 2(2):94–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh MH, Wang D, Kubica E (2008) Perception-based lossy haptic compression considerations for velocity-based interactions. Multimedia Syst 13:275–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Francesca Bocca who collected the data in the original study, as well as Netta Gurari, one anonymous reviewer and the editor, Massimiliano Di Luca, for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriel Baud-Bovy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baud-Bovy, G. (2014). The Perception of the Centre of Elastic Force Fields: A Model of Integration of the Force and Position Signals. In: Di Luca, M. (eds) Multisensory Softness. Springer Series on Touch and Haptic Systems. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6533-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6533-0_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6532-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6533-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics