Abstract
Softness perception offers a good opportunity to study how position and force information are integrated during exploratory movements. This chapter presents a model of how this integration might happen when identifying the central position of a very weak elastic force field rendered with a haptic device. In this task, the force near the central position of the force field is below the perceptual threshold. The participant needs to explore the force field actively to identify its central position. The model predicts both the systematic and variable errors observed in this task. It also yields an estimate of the lowest force that can be sensed and suggests that the underlying processes are affected by at least two noise sources that reflect limits in our force and position sensing abilities. An implication of the existence of a force threshold for softness perception is that the perceived stiffness of very soft material might be overestimated.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
An alternative view is to conceptualize the processes yielding a sensation as intrinsically noisy (Thurstone 1927). In this case, the sensation elicited by the stimulus is modeled as a random variable while the threshold is assumed to be fixed. Moreover, the response variability arises from the fluctuations of the sensation instead of the threshold. The two threshold models are not distinguishable empirically without making additional assumptions. Depending on the view, the response variability can therefore be interpreted either as quantifying the variability of the threshold or the amount of noise in the sensory channel (Gescheider 1997; Macmillan and Creelman 2005).
References
Baud-Bovy G, Gatti E (2010a) Hand-held object force direction identification thresholds at rest and during movement. In: Kappers AML et al (eds) Haptics: generating and perceiving tangible sensations. Proceedings of the international euroHaptics 2010 conference. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 6192, pp 231–236
Baud-Bovy G, Gatti E (2010b) The contribution of proprioception and touch to the perception of weak forces: preliminary results. in: Proceedings of the 26th meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics, Fechner’s Day, Padova, Italy, 19–22 Oct, pp 599–603
Baud-Bovy G, Schochia L (2009) Is mass invariant? Effects of movement amplitude and duration. In: Proceedings of 25th Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics, Fechner’s Day, Galway, Ireland, 21–24 Oct, pp 369–374
Beauregard GL, Srinivasan, MA, Durlach NI (1995) The manual resolution of viscosity and mass. In: Proceedings of the ASME dynamic systems and control division, DSC-vol 57–2, IMECE, pp 657–662
Bergmann Tiest WM, Kappers AML (2008) Kinaesthetic and cutaneous cotributions to the perception of compressibility. In: Ferre M (ed) Haptics: perception, devices and scenarios. Proceedings of the international euroHaptics 2008 conference. Lectures notes in computer science, vol 5024, pp 255–264
Bocca F, Baud-Bovy G (2009) A model of perception of the central point of elastic force fields. In: Proceedings of 3rd joint EuroHaptics conference and symposium on haptic interfaces for virtual environment and teleoperator systems, Salt-Lake City, USA, pp 576-581
Brodie E, Ross HE (1984) Jiggling a lifted weight does aid discrimination. Am J Psychol 98(30):469–471
Di Luca M, Knorlein B, Ernst MO, Harders M (2011) Effects of visual-haptic asynchronies and loading-unloading movements on compliance perception. Brain Res Bull 85:245–259
Gescheider GA (1997) Psychophysics: the fundamentals, 3rd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah
Gibson J (1962) Observations on active touch. Psychol Rev 69(6):477–491
Gurari N, Baud-Bovy G (2014) Customization, control, and characterization of a commercial haptic device for high-fidelity rendering of weak forces. J Neurosci Methods (in revision)
Jones LA, Hunter IW (1993) A perceptual analysis of viscosity. Exp Brain Res 94:343–351
Jones LA (1986) Perception of force and weight: theory and research. Psychol Bull 100(1):29–42
Klatzky RL, Lederman S (1995) Identifying objects from a haptic glance. Percep Psychophys 57(8):1111–1123
Lawrence DA (1993) Stability and transparency in bilateral tele-operation. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 9(5):624–637
Lederman SJ, Klatsky RL (1987) Hand movements: a window into haptic object recognition. Cogn Psychol 19:342–368
Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL (2009) Haptic perception: a tutorial. Attention Percep Psychophys 71(7):1439–1459
Macmillan NA, Creelman CD (2005) Detection theory, a user’s guide, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associate, Mahwah
Nisky I, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Karniel A (2008) A regression and boundary-crossing-based model for the perception of delayed stiffness. IEEE Transations on Haptics 1:7382
Parietti F, Baud-Bovy G, Gatti E, Riener R, Guzzella L, Vallery H (2011) Series viscoelastic actuators can match human force perception. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 16(5):853–860
Pressman A, Welty LJ, Karniel A, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (2007) Perception of delayed stiffness. Int J Robot Res 26:1191–1203
Pressman A, Karniel A, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (2011) Perceptual localization and assessment of rigidity. J Neurosci 31(17):6595–6604
Ross HE, Brodie E, Benson AJ (1984) Mass discrimination during prolonged weightlessness. Science 225:219–221
Ross HE, Brodie EE (1987) Weber fractions for weight and mass as a function of stimulus intensity. Q J Exp Psychol 39A:77–88
Salisbury C, Gillespie RB, Tan H, Barbagli F, Salisbury JK (2009) Effects of haptic device attributes on vibration detection thresholds. In: Third joint eurohaptics conference and symposium on haptic interfaces for virtual environment and teleoperator systems (world haptics). pp 115–120
Srinivasan MA, LaMotte RH (1995) Tactual discrimination of softness. J Neurophysiol 73(1):88–101
Srinivisan MA, LaMotte RH (1996) Tactual discrimination of softness: abilities and mechanisms. In: Franzén O, Johansson R, Terenius LY (eds) Somesthesis and the neurobiology of the somatosensory cortex, Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, pp 123–136
Sherrington CS (1900) The muscular sense. In: Schafer EA (ed) Textbook of Physiology vol 2. Pentland, Edinburgh, pp 1002–1025
Thurstone LL (1927) Psychophysical analysis. Am J Psychol 38(3):368–389
Tan HZ, Durlach NI, Beauregard GL, Srinivasan MA (1995) Manual discrimination of compliance using active pinch grasp: the role of force and work cues. Percep Psychophys 57(4):495–510
Weber EH (1834) The sense of touch. Academic Press, London (Original work published 1834)
Wijntjes MWA, Sato A, Hayward V, Kappers AML (2009) Local surface orientation dominates haptic curvature discrimination. IEEE Trans Haptics 2(2):94–102
Zadeh MH, Wang D, Kubica E (2008) Perception-based lossy haptic compression considerations for velocity-based interactions. Multimedia Syst 13:275–282
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank Francesca Bocca who collected the data in the original study, as well as Netta Gurari, one anonymous reviewer and the editor, Massimiliano Di Luca, for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baud-Bovy, G. (2014). The Perception of the Centre of Elastic Force Fields: A Model of Integration of the Force and Position Signals. In: Di Luca, M. (eds) Multisensory Softness. Springer Series on Touch and Haptic Systems. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6533-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6533-0_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6532-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6533-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)