Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mapping the Curriculum: How Concept Maps can Improve the Effectiveness of Course Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Knowledge Cartography

Part of the book series: Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing ((AI&KP))

Abstract

Every program of instruction taking place in schools, from French to physics, is the result of a complex process called “curriculum development.” It begins with the setting of high level goals and then proceeds through successive stages of elaboration of the concepts, scoping and sequencing content. The design must then be communicated and adopted by the teachers who will implement it. Historically, curriculum reform efforts have not been consistently effective in delivering the desired improvements in student understanding. This chapter discusses how the use of concept mapping could help curriculum developers and teachers at various stages of the process. The ability of maps to focus on key ideas and their connections may help curriculum designs to survive better the translation into classroom experience, and promote collaborative working methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aidman, E.V. & Egan, G. (1998) Academic assessment through computerized concept mapping: validating a method of implicit map reconstruction. International Journal of Instructional Media, 25(3), 277–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, B.S., Hoffman, R.P., Kompella, J., & Sticht, T.G. (1993) Computer-based Mapping for Curriculum Development. In: Proceedings of selected Research and Development Presentations Technology. New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brazee, E.N. & Capelluti, J. (1995) Dissolving Boundaries: Toward an Integrative Curriculum. Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brightman, J. (2003) Mapping methods for qualitative data structuring. Present at “Strategies in Qualitative Research: Methodological issues and practices using QSR Nvivo and NUD*IST” conference: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, I.F. & James, P.R. (2004) Using Concept maps to plan an introductory structural geology course. Journal of Geoscience Education, 52(3), 224–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornbleth, C. (1990) Curriculum in Context. Basingstoke: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education and Skills (2002) Framework for teaching science: Years 7, 8 and 9. London: Crown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diekhoff, G.M. (1983) Relationship judgments in the evaluation of structural understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 227–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, K.M. (1995) Concept mapping for the development of medical curricula. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(7), 777–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grundy, S. (1987) Curriculum: Product or Praxis? Lewes: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harden, R.E. (2001) Curriculum mapping: a tool for transparent and authentic teaching and learning. Medical Teacher 23(2):123–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassard, J. (2004) The Art of Teaching Science. OUP, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyerle, D. (1996) Visual Tools for Constructing Knowledge. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D.H. (1987) Assessing cognitive structure: Verifying a method using pattern notes.Journal of Research and Development in Education, 20(3), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D.H. (1996) Computers as Mindtools for Schools. London: Prentice-Hall International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, A.V. (1983, 1999) The Curriculum. Theory and practice 4e. London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D.J. (1994) Concept Mapping as an aid to lesson planning: A longitudinal study. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 6(2), 11–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAleese, R.A. (1998) The knowledge arena as an extension to the concept map: Reflection in Action. Interactive Learning Environments, 6(3), 251–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, E., Roth, B., & Millar, M. (2005) Concept mapping as a tool for curriculum design, Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology Education Joint Conference, 505–513, Flagstaff, AZ, June 16–19, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • McTighe, J. & F.T. Lyman Jr. (1988) Cueing thinking in the curriculum: the promise of theory-embedded tools. Educational Leadership, 45(7), 18–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J.D. & Gowin, D.B. (1984) Learning How to Learn. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Okey, J.R. & Gagne, R.M. (1970) Revision of a science topic using evidence of performance on subordinate skills. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 7(4), 321–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ornstein, A.C. & Hunkins, F.P. (1998) Curriculum – Foundations, Principles, and Issues, Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paykoc, F et al. (2004) What are the major curriculum issues? The use of mindmapping as a brainstorming exercise. Proceedings of the First Int. Conference on Concept Mapping: Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. (1992) Smart Schools. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prideaux, D. (2003) Curriculum design. BMJ. 326, 268–270 <http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/reprint/326/7383/268>

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Project 2061 American Association for the advancement of science (2001) Designs for Science Literacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • QCA (2000) The Standards Site: Science at key stage 3. http://www.standards.dfes.gov.uk/ schemes2/secondary_science/>

  • Skilbeck, M. (1984) School-based Curriculum Development. London: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparkes, A.C. (1991) Exploring the subjective dimensions of curriculum change. In: N. Armstrong and A.C. Sparkes (eds) Issues in Physical Education. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starr, M., and Krajcik, J. (1990) Concept maps as a heuristic for science curriculum development: Toward improvement in process and product. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(9), 987–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenhouse, L. (1975) An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development. London:Heineman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J., Van Kirk, J., & Rowell, R. (1979) Concept maps: A tool for use in biology teaching. American Biology Teacher, 41(3), 171–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taba, H. (1962) Curriculum Development: Theory and Practice. San Francisco: Harcourt,Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, R.W. (1949) Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilela, R. et al. (2004) Using concept maps for collaborative curriculum development. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Concept Mapping: Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J.M., Cordray, D.S., & King, P.H. (2002) Concept mapping as a form of student assessment and instruction. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wandersee, J.H. (1990) Concept mapping and the cartography of cognition. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 923–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, G. & McTighe, J. (2003) Understanding by design. New Jersey: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willerman, M. & Mac Harg, R.A. (1991) The concept map as an advance organizer. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(8), 705–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Science Education, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK

    Tony Sherborne

Authors
  1. Tony Sherborne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tony Sherborne .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Knowledge Media Institute, The Open University, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom

    Alexandra Okada

  2. Connected Intelligence Centre, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia

    Simon J. Buckingham Shum

  3. Sheffield Hallam University Centre for Science Education, Sheffield, United Kingdom

    Tony Sherborne

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sherborne, T. (2014). Mapping the Curriculum: How Concept Maps can Improve the Effectiveness of Course Development. In: Okada, A., Buckingham Shum, S., Sherborne, T. (eds) Knowledge Cartography. Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6470-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6470-8_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6469-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6470-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation