The Innovation Binder Approach: A Guide Towards a Social-Technical Balanced Pervasive Health System

  • A. Jacobs
  • P. Duysburgh
  • L. Bleumers
  • F. Ongenae
  • A. Ackaert
  • S. Verstichel
Part of the Human–Computer Interaction Series book series (HCIS)

Abstract

Pervasive health systems aim to support society with the many challenges our healthcare system is facing today.

References

  1. 1.
    Ackaert, A., Jacobs, A., Veys, A., Derboven, J., Gils, M., Buysse, H., et al. (2009). A multi-disciplinary approach towards the design and development of value+ eHomeCare services. In K. Yogesan, L. Bos, P. Brett, & M. Gibbons (Eds.), Handbook of Digital Homecare (pp. 243–267). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bijker, W. E. (1997). Of bicycles, bakelites and bulbs: Toward a theory of sociotechnical change. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bleumers, L., Jacobs, A., Ongenae, F., Ackaert, A., Sulmon, N., Verstraete, M., et al. (2011). Towards ontology co-creation in institutionalized care settings. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on IEEE Xplore Digital Library. Presented at the Pervasive Health, Dublin (pp. 559–562).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bødker, S. (2000). Scenarios in user-centred design–setting the stage for reflection and action. Interacting with Computers, 13(1), 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carroll, J. M. (2000). Five reasons for scenario-based design. Interacting with Computers, 13(1), 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Rouck, S., Jacobs, A., & Leys, M. (2008). A methodology for shifting the focus of e-health support design onto user needs: A case in the homecare field. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 77, 589–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Elprama, S., Duysburgh, P., Bleumers, L., & Jacobs, A. (2013). Developing assistive technology with multidisciplinary teams: a front-end procedure to stimulate collaboration and manage expectations. In Proceedings of the 12th European Association for the Advancement of Assistive Technology in Europe Conference (AAATE), Vilamoura, Algarve, Portugal, 2013. Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Garcia, M. L., & Bray, O. H. (1997). Fundamentals of technology roadmapping. Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Isaksen, S. G., Stead-Dorval, K. B., & Treffinger, D. J. (2011). Creative approaches to problem solving: A framework for innovation and change. Los Angeles: SAGE.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jacobs, A., Dreessen, K., and Pierson, J. (2008). “Thick”personas-Using ethnographic Methods for Persona Development as a Tool for Conveying the Social Science View in Technological Design. Observatorio (OBS*), 5, 79–97.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Johansson, M., & Arvola, M. (2007). A case study of how user interface sketches, scenarios and computer prototypes structure stakeholder meetings. In Proceedings of the 21st British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: HCI... but not as we know it (Vol. 1, pp. 177–184).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Karasti, H., Baker, K. S., & Bowker, G. C. (2002). Ecological storytelling and collaborative scientific activities. ACM SIGGROUP Bulletin, 23(2), 29–30.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Limonard, S., de Koning, N. (2005) Dealing with dilemmas in pre-competitive ICT. Development projects: The construction of ‘The Social’ in designing new technologies. In L. Haddon, E. Mante, B. Sapio, K-H. Kommonen, L. Fortunati & A. Kant (Eds.), Everyday Innovators (pp. 168–183). Computer Supported Cooperative Work (p. 32). Netherlands: Springer. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/1-4020-3872-0_11
  14. 14.
    Martin, B., & Hanington, B. M. (2012). Universal methods of design: 100 ways to research complex problems, develop innovative ideas, and design effective solutions. Beverly, MA: Rockport Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Muller, M. J. (2002). Participatory design: The third space in HCI. Cambrigde, MA: Lotus Research, Lotus Development Corporation.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ongenae, F., Bleumers, L., Sulmon, N., Verstraete, M., Van Gils, M., Jacobs, A., De Zutter, S., Verhoeve, P., Ackaert, A. & De Turck, F. (2011). Participatory design of a continuous care ontology: Towards a user-driven ontology engineering methodology. In Proceedings of the International Knowledge Engineering and Ontology Development Conference (KEOD), (pp. 81–90). Paris, France: SciTePress.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ongenae, F., Duysburgh, P., Verstraete, M., Sulmon, N., Bleumers, L., Jacobs, A., Ackaert, A., De Zutter, S., Verstichel, S. & De Turck, F. User-driven design of a context-aware application: An ambient-intelligent nurse call system. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Pervasive Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth), (pp. 205–210). San Diego, CA, USA: IEEE.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pagliari, C. (2007). Design and evaluation in eHealth: Challenges and implications for an interdisciplinary field. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 9(2), e15.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rip, A., Misa, T. J., & Schot, J. (1995). Managing technology in society: The approach of constructive technology assessment. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schatzki, T. R. (1997). Practices and actions: A Wittgensteinian critique of Bourdieu and Giddens. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 27(3), 283–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sennett, R. (2012). Together: The rituals, pleasures, and politics of cooperation. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Star, S. L. (2010, January 9) This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology & Human Values, 35(5), 601–617.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stewart, J., & Claeys, L. (2009). Problems and opportunities of interdisciplinary work involving users in speculative research for innovation of novel ICT applications. In S. B. (Ed.), Presented at the COST298 The Good, The Bad and The Challenging. The user and the future of information and communication technologies (Vol. I). Koper, Slovenia: ABS-Center.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Van Bemmel, J. H. (2008). Medical informatics is interdisciplinary avant la lettre. Methods of Information in Medicine, 47, 318–321. doi: 10.3414/ME9119
  25. 25.
    Ziefle, M., Röcker, C., Holzinger, A. (2014). Current trends and challenges for pervasive health technologies: From technical innovation to user integration. In Pervasive health: State-of-the-art & beyond, (pp. 1–18). London: Springer.Google Scholar

Further Reading

  1. 26.
    Carroll, J. M. (1995). Scenario-based design: Envisioning work and technology in system development. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. 27.
    Nielsen, L. (2013). Personas: User focused design. London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Jacobs
    • 1
  • P. Duysburgh
    • 1
  • L. Bleumers
    • 1
  • F. Ongenae
    • 2
  • A. Ackaert
    • 2
  • S. Verstichel
    • 2
  1. 1.iMinds—SMITVrije Universiteit BrusselElseneBelgium
  2. 2.iMinds—IBCNUniversiteit GentGentBelgium

Personalised recommendations