Engineering Issues in Physiological Computing

Chapter
Part of the Human–Computer Interaction Series book series (HCIS)

Abstract

Prototypes of physiological computing systems have appeared in countless fields, but few have made the leap from research to widespread use. This is due to several practical problems that can be roughly divided into four major categories: hardware, signal processing, psychophysiological inference, and feedback loop design. This chapter explores these issues from an engineering point of view, discussing major weaknesses and suggesting directions for potential solutions. Specifically, some of the topics covered are: unobtrusiveness and robustness of the hardware, real-time signal processing capability, different approaches to design and validation of a psychophysiological classifier, and the desired complexity of the feedback rules. The chapter also briefly discusses the challenge of finding an appropriate practical application for physiological computing, then ends with a summary of recommendations for future research.

Keywords

Fatigue Respiration Picot 

References

  1. Berka C, Levendowski DJ, Cvetinovic MM, Petrovic MM, Davis G, Lumicao MN et al (2004) Real-time analysis of EEG indexes of alertness, cognition, and memory acquired with a wireless EEG headset. Int J Hum-Comput Int 17:151–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernardin K, Ogawara K, Ikeuchi K, Dillmann R (2005) A sensor fusion approach for recognizing continuous human grasping sequences using hidden Markov models. IEEE Trans Rob 21:425–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berntson GG, Quigley KS, Jang JF, Boysen ST (1990) An approach to artifact identification: application to heart period data. Psychophysiology 27:586–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Booth M (2009). The AI Systems of Left 4 Dead. Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment Conference at StanfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Boucsein W (2011). Electrodermal Activity (2nd ed.)Google Scholar
  6. Brunner P, Bianchi L, Guger C, Cincotti F, Schalk G (2011) Current trends in hardware and software for brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). J Neural Eng 8(2):025001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cacioppo JT, Tassinary LG (1990) Inferring psychological significance from physiological signals. Am Psychol 45:16–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chanel G, Kierkels JJM, Soleymani M, Pun T (2009) Short-term emotion assessment in a recall paradigm. Int J Hum Comput Stud 67:607–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chi YM, Jung T, Cauwenberghs G (2010) Dry-contact and noncontact biopotential electrodes: methodological review. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng 3:106–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chi YM, Wang Y-T, Wang Y, Maier C, Jung T-P, Cauwenberghs G (2012) Dry and noncontact EEG sensors for mobile brain-computer interfaces. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 20:228–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Croft RJ, Barry RJ (2000) Removal of ocular artifact from the EEG: a review. Neurophysiol Clin 30:5–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duvinage M, Castermans T, Dutoit T, Petieau M, Hoellinger T, De Saedeleer C, Seetharaman K, et al. (2012). A P300-based quantitative comparison between the emotiv Epoc headset and a medical EEG device. In: Proceedings of the 9th Iasted conference on biomedical engineeringGoogle Scholar
  13. Ebner-Priemer UW, Kubiak T (2007) Psychological and psychophysiological ambulatory monitoring. Eur J Psychol Assess 23:214–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Estepp J, Monnin J, Christensen J, Wilson G (2010). Evaluation of a dry electrode system for electroencephalography: applications for psychophysiological cognitive workload assessment. In: Proceedings of the 2010 human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, pp 210–214Google Scholar
  15. Fairclough SH (2009) Fundamentals of physiological computing. Interact Comput 21:133–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gilleade, K., Dix, A., & Allanson, J. (2005). Affective videogames and modes of affective gaming: assist me, challenge me, emote me. In: Proceedings of DiGRAGoogle Scholar
  17. Grossman P, Wilhelm FH, Brutsche M (2010) Accuracy of ventilatory measurement employing ambulatory inductive plethysmography during tasks of everyday life. Biol Psychol 84:121–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gruebler A, Berenz V, Suzuki K (2012) Emotionally assisted human-robot interaction using a wearable device for reading facial expressions. Adv Robot 26:37–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gwin JT, Gramann K, Makeig S, Ferris DP (2010) Removal of movement artifact from high-density EEG recorded during walking and running. J Neurophysiol 103:3526–3534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Healey JA, Picard RW (2005). Detecting stress during real-world driving tasks using physiological sensors. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 6, 156–166Google Scholar
  21. Healey JA, Picard RW, Dabek F (1998). A new affect-perceiving interface and its application to personalized music selection. In: Proceedings of the 1998 workshop on perceptual user interfaces. San Francisco, USAGoogle Scholar
  22. Ji Q, Lan P, Looney C (2006) A probabilistic framework for modeling and real-time monitoring human fatigue. Sys Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 36:862–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ju W, Leifer L (2008) The design of implicit interactions: Making interactive systems less obnoxious. Des Issues 24:72–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Koenig A, Novak D, Omlin X, Pulfer M, Perreault E, Zimmerli L, Mihelj M et al (2011) Real-time closed-loop control of cognitive load in neurological patients during robot-assisted gait training. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 19:453–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kreibig SD (2010) Autonomic nervous system activity in emotion: a review. Biol Psychol 84:394–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee B-G, Chung W-Y (2012) Driver alertness monitoring using fusion of facial features and bio-signals. IEEE Sens J 12:2416–2422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lin Y (2011) A natural contact sensor paradigm for nonintrusive and real-time sensing of biosignals in human-machine interactions. IEEE Sens J 11:522–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu C, Conn K, Sarkar N, Stone W (2008) Online affect detection and robot behavior adaptation for intervention of children with autism. IEEE Trans Rob 24:883–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mandryk RL, Atkins MS (2007) A fuzzy physiological approach for continuously modeling emotion during interaction with play technologies. Int J Hum Comput Stud 65:329–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Novak D, Mihelj M, Munih M (2012) A survey of methods for data fusion and system adaptation using autonomic nervous system responses in physiological computing. Interact Comput 24:154–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Novak D, Mihelj M, Ziherl J, Olenšek A, Munih M (2011) Psychophysiological measurements in a biocooperative feedback loop for upper extremity rehabilitation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 19:400–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Picard RW, Vyzas E, Healey J (2001) Toward machine emotional intelligence: Analysis of affective physiological state. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 23:1175–1191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Picot A, Charbonnier S, Caplier A (2012) On-line detection of drowsiness using brain and visual information. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 42(3):764–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ritter W (2011) Benefits of subliminal feedback loops in human-computer interaction. Adv Hum-Comput Interact 2011:346492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Scarpa Scerbo A, Freedman LW, Raine A, Dawson ME, Venables PH (1992) A major effect of recording site on measurement of electrodermal activity. Psychophysiology 29:241–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Serbedzija N, Fairclough SH (2012). Reflective pervasive systems. ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems 7(1), article 12Google Scholar
  37. Tapus A, Tapus C, Matarić M (2008) User—robot personality matching and assistive robot behavior adaptation for post-stroke rehabilitation therapy. Intel Serv Robot 1:169–183Google Scholar
  38. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology (1996) Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Eur Heart J 17:354–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vaughan TM, Wolpaw JR, Donchin E (1996) EEG-based communication: Prospects and problems. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 4:425–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ware MP, McCullagh PJ, McRoberts A, Lightbody G, Nugent C, McAllister G, Mulvenna MD et al. (2010). Contrasting levels of accuracy in command interaction sequences for a domestic brain-computer interface using SSVEP. 5th Cairo international biomedical engineering conference, pp 150–153Google Scholar
  41. Wartzek T, Eilebrecht B, Lem J, Lindner H-J, Leonhardt S, Walter M (2011) ECG on the road: robust and unobtrusive estimation of heart rate. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 58:3112–3120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wilhelm FH, Grossman P (2010) Emotions beyond the laboratory: theoretical fundaments, study design, and analytic strategies for advanced ambulatory assessment. Biol Psychol 84:552–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wilhelm FH, Pfaltz MC, Grossman P (2006) Continuous electronic data capture of physiology, behavior and experience in real life: towards ecological momentary assessment of emotion. Interact Comput 18:171–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wilpon JG, Rabiner LR, Lee C-H, Goldman ER (1990) Automatic recognition of keywords in unconstrained speech using hidden Markov models. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Signal Process 38:1870–1878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wilson GF, Russell C (2007) Performance enhancement in an uninhabited air vehicle task using psychophysiologically determined adaptive aiding. Hum Factors 49:1005–1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wöllmer M, Blaschke C, Schindl T, Schuller B, Färber B, Mayer S, Trefflich B (2011) Online driver distraction detection using long short-term memory. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 12:574–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yang G, Lin Y, Bhattacharya P (2008) Multimodality inferring of human cognitive states based on integration of neuro-fuzzy network and information fusion techniques. EURASIP J Adv Signal Process 2008:371621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zeng Z, Pantic M, Roisman GI, Huang TS (2009) A survey of affect recognition methods: audio, visual, and spontaneous expressions. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 38(1):39–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sensory-Motor Systems LabETH Zurich ZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations