Abstract
This chapter introduces the relevant terms of reliability and safety engineering. The need for this discipline and also its wide range of applications are discussed. A historical overview in the form of important milestones, present challenges and future needs for the practice of reliability and safety engineering are explained. Potential improvements in probabilistic safety assessment as revealed by Fukushima accident are also discussed, which include improving accident sequence modeling, increasing the scope of the analysis, and appropriate treatment of uncertainties. Resources including failure data banks, tools, list of journals, and list of conferences are provided.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Wilkins DJ (2002) The bathtub curve and product failure behavior. Reliab Hot Wire 21 & 22
ISO 9001:2008 (2012) Quality Management Systems—Requirements
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (1990) IEEE standard computer dictionary: a compilation of IEEE standard computer glossaries, New York. ISBN 1-55937-079-3
BS 4778 Glossary of terms used in quality assurance, including reliability and maintainability terms. British Standards Institution, London
Barlow RE, Proschan F (1973) Availability theory for multicomponent system, multivariate analysis III. Academic Press Inc., New York, pp 319–335 (Reliability and life testing: probability models)
Kaplan S, Garrick BJ (1981) On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Anal 1:11–27
Aven T (2010) On how to define, understand and describe risk. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 95:623–631
IAEA (1992) Procedure for conducting probabilistic safety assessment of nuclear power plants (level 1). International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Safety Series No. 50-P-4
IAEA (2002) Review of probabilistic safety assessments by regulatory bodies. Safety Reports Series, No. 25, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna
Villemeur A (1992) Reliability, maintainability, and safety assessment, vol 1. Methods and techniques. Wiley, New York
Saleh JH, Marais K (2006) Highlights from the early (and pre-) history of reliability engineering. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91:249–256
Keller W, Modarres M (2005) A historical overview of probabilistic risk assessment development and its use in the nuclear power industry: a tribute to the late professor Norman Carl Rasmussesn. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 89:271–285
USNRC (1975) Reactor safety study: an assessment of accident risk in US commercial power plants (WASH-1400). USNRC
USNRC (1990) Severe accident risks: an assessment for five US nuclear power plants, NUREG-1150
Moranda PB (1975) Prediction of software reliability during debugging. In: Proceedings of the annual reliability maintenance symposium, pp 327–32
Fleming KN, Kalinowski AM (1983) An extension of the beta factor method to systems with high level of redundancy. Pickard, Lowe and Garric Inc. PLG-0289
Mosleh A et al (1988) Procedures for treating common cause failures in safety and reliability studies. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Electric Power Research Institute, NUREG/CR-4780, and EPRI NP-5613, vols 1 and 2
Swain AD, Guttmann HE (1983) Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications, NUREG/CR-1278, USNRC
Azarkhail M, Modarres M (2012) The evolution and history of reliability engineering: rise of mechanical reliability modeling. Int J Perform Eng 8(1):35–47
Elasayed EA (1996) Reliability engineering. Prentice Hall, New Jersey
Misra KB (1992) Reliability analysis and prediction. Elsevier Publishers, New York
NASA (2002) Probabilistic risk assessment procedures guide for NASA managers and practitioners. Version 1.1, NASA Report
Modarres M (1985) Statistical uncertainty analysis in reactor risk estimation. Nucl Eng Des 85:385–399
Wu JS, Apostolakis GE, Okrent D (1990) Uncertainties in system analysis: probabilistic Vs non probabilistic theories. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 30:163–181
Helton JC (1993) Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for use in performance assessment for radioactive waste disposal. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 42:327–367
Ferson S, Hajago JG (2004) Arithmetic with uncertain numbers: rigorous and often best possible answers. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 85:135–152
Karanki DR, Kushwaha HS, Verma AK, Srividya A (2007) Quantification of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties in level-1 probabilistic safety assessment studies. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 92(7):947–956
Zio E (2009) Reliability engineering: old problems and new challenges. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94:125–141
SAFERELNET (2006) Safety and reliability of industrial products, systems and structures: current position and future research needs. http://www.mar.ist.utl.pt/saferelnet/
IAEA (2010) Development and application of level 1 probabilistic safety assessment for nuclear power plants. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, IAEA SAFETY STANDARDS SERIES No. SSG-3
ASME (2002) Probabilistic risk assessment for nuclear power plant applications, RA-S-2002. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York
ASME (2013) Probabilistic risk assessment standard for advanced non-LWR nuclear power plants, ASME/ANS RA-S-1.4-2013. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York
Siu N et al (2013) PSA technology challenges revealed by the great east Japan earthquake. In: PSAM topical conference in light of the Fukushima Daiichi accident, Tokyo, Japan, 15–17 April 2013
Lyubarskiy A, Kuzmina I, El-Shanawany M (2011) Notes on potential areas for enhancement of the PSA methodology based on lessons learned from the Fukushima accident. In: Proceedings of the 2nd probabilistic safety analysis/human factors assessment forum, Warrington, UK, 8–9 Sept 2011
Karanki DR, Dang VN (2013) Quantified dynamic event trees vs PSA: a comparison for MLOCA risk. In: ANS PSA 2013 international topical meeting on probabilistic safety assessment and analysis, Columbia, SC, USA, 22–26 Sept 2013, American Nuclear Society, CD-ROM
Karanki DR, Dang VN Quantification of dynamic event trees: a comparison with event trees for MLOCA scenario. In: Communication with reliability engineering and system safety
Karanki DR, Dang VN, Kim TW (2012) The impact of dynamics on the MLOCA accident model: an application of dynamic event trees. In: Proceedings 11th probabilistic safety assessment and management/European safety and reliability 2012 (PSAM11/ESREL2012), Helsinki, Finland, 25–29 June 2012, CD-ROM
Karanki DR, Kim T-W, Dang VN (2015) A dynamic event tree informed approach to probabilistic accident sequence modeling: dynamics and variabilities in medium LOCA. Reliab Eng Syst Saf (ISSN: 0951-8320) 142:78–91
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2000) Technical basis and implementation guidelines for a technique for human event analysis (ATHEANA). NUREG-1624, Rev. 1, Washington, DC
Julius JA, Jorgenson EJ, Parry GW, Mosleh AM (1995) A procedure for the analysis of errors of commission in a probabilistic safety assessment of a nuclear power plant at full power. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 50:189–201
Podofillini L, Dang VN, Nusbaumer O, Dress D (2013) A pilot study for errors of commission for a boiling water reactor using the CESA method. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 109:86–98
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Verma, A.K., Ajit, S., Karanki, D.R. (2016). Introduction. In: Reliability and Safety Engineering. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6269-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6269-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6268-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6269-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)