Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reliability and Safety Engineering

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Reliability Engineering ((RELIABILITY))

Abstract

This chapter introduces the relevant terms of reliability and safety engineering. The need for this discipline and also its wide range of applications are discussed. A historical overview in the form of important milestones, present challenges and future needs for the practice of reliability and safety engineering are explained. Potential improvements in probabilistic safety assessment as revealed by Fukushima accident are also discussed, which include improving accident sequence modeling, increasing the scope of the analysis, and appropriate treatment of uncertainties. Resources including failure data banks, tools, list of journals, and list of conferences are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wilkins DJ (2002) The bathtub curve and product failure behavior. Reliab Hot Wire 21 & 22

    Google Scholar 

  2. ISO 9001:2008 (2012) Quality Management Systems—Requirements

    Google Scholar 

  3. http://www.iso.org

  4. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (1990) IEEE standard computer dictionary: a compilation of IEEE standard computer glossaries, New York. ISBN 1-55937-079-3

    Google Scholar 

  5. BS 4778 Glossary of terms used in quality assurance, including reliability and maintainability terms. British Standards Institution, London

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barlow RE, Proschan F (1973) Availability theory for multicomponent system, multivariate analysis III. Academic Press Inc., New York, pp 319–335 (Reliability and life testing: probability models)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kaplan S, Garrick BJ (1981) On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Anal 1:11–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Aven T (2010) On how to define, understand and describe risk. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 95:623–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. IAEA (1992) Procedure for conducting probabilistic safety assessment of nuclear power plants (level 1). International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Safety Series No. 50-P-4

    Google Scholar 

  10. IAEA (2002) Review of probabilistic safety assessments by regulatory bodies. Safety Reports Series, No. 25, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  11. Villemeur A (1992) Reliability, maintainability, and safety assessment, vol 1. Methods and techniques. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Saleh JH, Marais K (2006) Highlights from the early (and pre-) history of reliability engineering. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91:249–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Keller W, Modarres M (2005) A historical overview of probabilistic risk assessment development and its use in the nuclear power industry: a tribute to the late professor Norman Carl Rasmussesn. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 89:271–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. USNRC (1975) Reactor safety study: an assessment of accident risk in US commercial power plants (WASH-1400). USNRC

    Google Scholar 

  15. USNRC (1990) Severe accident risks: an assessment for five US nuclear power plants, NUREG-1150

    Google Scholar 

  16. Moranda PB (1975) Prediction of software reliability during debugging. In: Proceedings of the annual reliability maintenance symposium, pp 327–32

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fleming KN, Kalinowski AM (1983) An extension of the beta factor method to systems with high level of redundancy. Pickard, Lowe and Garric Inc. PLG-0289

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mosleh A et al (1988) Procedures for treating common cause failures in safety and reliability studies. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Electric Power Research Institute, NUREG/CR-4780, and EPRI NP-5613, vols 1 and 2

    Google Scholar 

  19. Swain AD, Guttmann HE (1983) Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications, NUREG/CR-1278, USNRC

    Google Scholar 

  20. Azarkhail M, Modarres M (2012) The evolution and history of reliability engineering: rise of mechanical reliability modeling. Int J Perform Eng 8(1):35–47

    Google Scholar 

  21. Elasayed EA (1996) Reliability engineering. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  22. Misra KB (1992) Reliability analysis and prediction. Elsevier Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. NASA (2002) Probabilistic risk assessment procedures guide for NASA managers and practitioners. Version 1.1, NASA Report

    Google Scholar 

  24. Modarres M (1985) Statistical uncertainty analysis in reactor risk estimation. Nucl Eng Des 85:385–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wu JS, Apostolakis GE, Okrent D (1990) Uncertainties in system analysis: probabilistic Vs non probabilistic theories. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 30:163–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Helton JC (1993) Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for use in performance assessment for radioactive waste disposal. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 42:327–367

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Ferson S, Hajago JG (2004) Arithmetic with uncertain numbers: rigorous and often best possible answers. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 85:135–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Karanki DR, Kushwaha HS, Verma AK, Srividya A (2007) Quantification of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties in level-1 probabilistic safety assessment studies. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 92(7):947–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zio E (2009) Reliability engineering: old problems and new challenges. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94:125–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. SAFERELNET (2006) Safety and reliability of industrial products, systems and structures: current position and future research needs. http://www.mar.ist.utl.pt/saferelnet/

  31. IAEA (2010) Development and application of level 1 probabilistic safety assessment for nuclear power plants. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, IAEA SAFETY STANDARDS SERIES No. SSG-3

    Google Scholar 

  32. ASME (2002) Probabilistic risk assessment for nuclear power plant applications, RA-S-2002. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  33. ASME (2013) Probabilistic risk assessment standard for advanced non-LWR nuclear power plants, ASME/ANS RA-S-1.4-2013. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  34. Siu N et al (2013) PSA technology challenges revealed by the great east Japan earthquake. In: PSAM topical conference in light of the Fukushima Daiichi accident, Tokyo, Japan, 15–17 April 2013

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lyubarskiy A, Kuzmina I, El-Shanawany M (2011) Notes on potential areas for enhancement of the PSA methodology based on lessons learned from the Fukushima accident. In: Proceedings of the 2nd probabilistic safety analysis/human factors assessment forum, Warrington, UK, 8–9 Sept 2011

    Google Scholar 

  36. Karanki DR, Dang VN (2013) Quantified dynamic event trees vs PSA: a comparison for MLOCA risk. In: ANS PSA 2013 international topical meeting on probabilistic safety assessment and analysis, Columbia, SC, USA, 22–26 Sept 2013, American Nuclear Society, CD-ROM

    Google Scholar 

  37. Karanki DR, Dang VN Quantification of dynamic event trees: a comparison with event trees for MLOCA scenario. In: Communication with reliability engineering and system safety

    Google Scholar 

  38. Karanki DR, Dang VN, Kim TW (2012) The impact of dynamics on the MLOCA accident model: an application of dynamic event trees. In: Proceedings 11th probabilistic safety assessment and management/European safety and reliability 2012 (PSAM11/ESREL2012), Helsinki, Finland, 25–29 June 2012, CD-ROM

    Google Scholar 

  39. Karanki DR, Kim T-W, Dang VN (2015) A dynamic event tree informed approach to probabilistic accident sequence modeling: dynamics and variabilities in medium LOCA. Reliab Eng Syst Saf (ISSN: 0951-8320) 142:78–91

    Google Scholar 

  40. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2000) Technical basis and implementation guidelines for a technique for human event analysis (ATHEANA). NUREG-1624, Rev. 1, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  41. Julius JA, Jorgenson EJ, Parry GW, Mosleh AM (1995) A procedure for the analysis of errors of commission in a probabilistic safety assessment of a nuclear power plant at full power. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 50:189–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Podofillini L, Dang VN, Nusbaumer O, Dress D (2013) A pilot study for errors of commission for a boiling water reactor using the CESA method. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 109:86–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ajit Kumar Verma .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Verma, A.K., Ajit, S., Karanki, D.R. (2016). Introduction. In: Reliability and Safety Engineering. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6269-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6269-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6268-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6269-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics