Cooperative Adaptive Control for Higher-Order Nonlinear Systems

  • Frank L. Lewis
  • Hongwei Zhang
  • Kristian Hengster-Movric
  • Abhijit Das
Chapter
Part of the Communications and Control Engineering book series (CCE)

Abstract

Cooperative control on communication graphs for agents that have unknown nonlinear dynamics that are not the same is a challenge. The interaction of the communication graph topology with the agent’s system dynamics is not easy to investigate if the dynamics of the agents are heterogeneous, that is, not identical, since the Kronecker product cannot be used to simplify the analysis. Therefore, the intertwining of the graph structure with the local control design is more severe and makes the design of guaranteed synchronizing controls very difficult. That is to say, the communication graph structure imposes more severe limitations on the design of controllers for systems that have nonlinear and nonidentical dynamics, making it more challenging to guarantee the synchronization of all agents in the network.

References

  1. 1.
    Das A, Lewis FL (2010) Distributed adaptive control for synchronization of unknown nonlinear networked systems. Automatica 46(12):2014–2021CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Das A, Lewis FL (2011) Cooperative adaptive control for synchronization of second-order systems with unknown nonlinearities. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control 21(3):1509–1524CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ge SS, Wang C (2004) Adaptive neural control of uncertain MIMO nonlinear systems. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 15(3):674–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ge SS, Zhang J (2003) Neural network control of non-affine nonlinear systems with zero dynamics by state and output feedback. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 14(4):900–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hornik K, Stinchcombe M, White H (1989) Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Networks 2(5):359–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jiang F, Wang L, Jia Y (2009) Consensus in leaderless networks of high-order-integrator agents. In: Proc. Amer. Control Conf., St. Louis, MO, pp. 4458–4463Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Khalil HK (2002) Nonlinear systems, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Khoo S, Xie L, Man Z (Apr 2009) Robust finite-time consensus tracking algorithm for multirobot systems. IEEE Trans Mechatron 14(2):219–228Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lewis FL, Yesildirek A, Liu K (1996) Multilayer neural net robot controller with guaranteed tracking performance. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 7(2):388–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lewis FL, Jagannathan S, Yesildirek A (1999) Neural Network Control of Robot Manipulators and Nonlinear Systems. Taylor and Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Qu Z (2009) Cooperative Control of Dynamical Systems: Applications to Autonomous Vehicles. Springer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ren W, Moore KL, Chen Y (2007) High-order and model reference consensus algorithms in cooperative control of multivehicle systems. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 129(5):678–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rinzel J (1987) A formal classification of bursting mechanisms in excitable systems. In: Teramoto E, Yamaguti M (eds) Mathematical Topics in Population Biology, Morphogenesis and Neurosciences Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shivakumar PN, Chew KH (1974) A sufficient condition for nonvanishing of determinants. Proc Amer Math Soc 43(1):63–66CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stone MH (1948) The generalized Weierstrass approximation theorem. Math Mag 21(4/5):167–184/237–254Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang J, Cheng D (2007) Consensus of multi-agent systems with higher order dynamics. In: Proc. Chinese Control Conf., Zhangjiajie, Hunan, pp 761–765Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang H, Lewis FL (2012) Adaptive cooperative tracking control of higher-order nonlinear systems with unknown dynamics. Automatica 48(7):1432–1439CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang H, Lewis FL, Das A (2011) Optimal design for synchronization of cooperative systems: state feedback, observer and output feedback. IEEE Trans Autom Control 56(8):1948–1952CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank L. Lewis
    • 1
  • Hongwei Zhang
    • 2
  • Kristian Hengster-Movric
    • 3
  • Abhijit Das
    • 4
  1. 1.UTA Research InstituteUniversity of Texas at ArlingtonFort WorthUSA
  2. 2.School of Electrical EngineeringSouthwest Jiaotong UniversityChengduChina, People’s Republic
  3. 3.UTA Research InstituteUniversity of Texas at ArlingtonFort WorthUSA
  4. 4.Advanced Systems Engineering​Danfoss Power Solutions (US) Company​AmesUSA

Personalised recommendations