Advertisement

Introduction to Synchronization in Nature and Physics and Cooperative Control for Multi-Agent Systems on Graphs

  • Frank L. LewisEmail author
  • Hongwei Zhang
  • Kristian Hengster-Movric
  • Abhijit Das
Chapter
Part of the Communications and Control Engineering book series (CCE)

Abstract

This chapter presents an overview of synchronization behavior in nature and social systems. It is seen that distributed decisions made by each agent in a group based only on the information locally available to it can result in collective synchronized motion of an overall group. The idea of a communication graph that models the information flows in a multi-agent group is introduced. Mechanisms are given by which decisions can be made locally by each agent and informed leaders can guide collective behaviors by interacting directly with only a few agents. Synchronization and collective behavior phenomena are discussed in biological systems, physics and chemistry, and engineered systems. The dependence of collective behaviors of a group on the type of information flow allowed between its agents is emphasized. Various different graph topologies are presented including random graphs, small-world networks, scale-free networks, and distance formation graphs. The early work in cooperative control systems on graphs is outlined.

Keywords

Random Graph Cluster Coefficient Collective Motion Graph Topology Communication Graph 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

Networks of Coupled Dynamical Systems. Collective Motion in Biological and Social Systems, Physics and Chemistry, and Engineered Systems

  1. 1.
    Darwin CR (1859) The Origin of Species. John Murray Publisher, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Strahan and Cadell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kauffman SA (1969) Metabolic stability and epigenesis in randomly constructed genetic nets. J Theor Biol 22:437–467CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kuramoto Y (1984) Chemical Oscillations, Waves, and Turbulence. Springer, BerlinCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Axelrod R (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reynolds CW (1987) Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioral model. Comput Graphics 21(4):25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sattenspiel L, Simon CP (1988) The spread and persistence of infectious diseases in structured populations. Math Biosci 90:341–366CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Strogatz SH, Stewart I (1993) Coupled oscillators and biological synchronization. Sci Am 269(6):102–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Das R, Mitchell M, Crutchfield JP (1994) Parallel Problem Solving from Nature. In: Davido Y, Schwefel H-P, Manner R (eds) Lecture Notes in Computer Science 866. Springer, Berlin, pp 344–353Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vicsek T, Czirok A, Ben-Jacob E, Cohen I, Shochet O (1995) Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. Phys Rev Lett 75(6):1226–1229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wiesenfeld K (1996) New results on frequency-locking dynamics of disordered Josephson arrays. Physica B 222:315–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bressloff PC, Coombes S, De Souza B (1997) Dynamics of a ring of pulse-coupled oscillators: a group theoretic approach. Phys Rev Lett 79:2791–2794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Helbing D, Farkas I, Vicsek T (2000) Simulating dynamical features of escape panic. Nature 407:487–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Couzin ID, Krause J, Franks NR, Levin SA (2005) Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move. Nature 533:513–516Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang W, Slotine J (2006) A theoretical study of different leader roles in networks. IEEE Trans Autom Control 51(7):1156–1161CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Defoort M, Floquet T, Kokosy A, Perruquetti W (2008) Sliding-mode formation control for cooperative autonomous mobile robots. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 55(11):3944–3953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cruz D, McClintock J, Perteet B, Orqueda O, Cao Y, Fierro R (2007) Decentralized cooperative control—a multivehicle platform for research in networked embedded systems. IEEE Control Syst Mag 27(3):58–78CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang X, Yadav V, Balakrishnan S (2007) Cooperative UAV formation flying with obstacle/collision avoidance. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Technol 15(4):672–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chen J, Cao X, Cheng P, Xiao Y, Sun Y (2010) Distributed collaborative control for industrial automation with wireless sensor and actuator networks. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 57(12):4219–4230CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Types of Graph Topologies and Structured Information Flow in Collective Groups

  1. 21.
    Murray R (2007) Recent research in cooperative control of multivehicle systems. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 129(5):571–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 22.
    Strogatz SH (2001) Exploring complex networks. Nature 410:268–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 23.
    Erdos P, Renyi A (1960) On the evolution of random graphs. Publ Math Inst Hung Acad Sci 5:17–61MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 24.
    Bollobas B (1985) Random Graphs. Academic Press, LondonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 25.
    Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics of small world networks. Nature 393:440–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 26.
    Barabasi AL, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286:509–512Google Scholar
  7. 27.
    Jeong H, Mason SP, Barabasi A-L, Oltvai ZN (2001) Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 411:41–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Distributed Computation and Cooperative Control of Multi-Agent Systems on Graphs

  1. 28.
    Tsitsiklis J (1984) Problems in Decentralized Decision Making and Computation. Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Elect. Eng. and Comput. Sci. MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  2. 29.
    Tsitsiklis J, Bertsekas D, Athans M (1986) Distributed asynchronous deterministic and stochastic gradient optimization algorithms. IEEE Trans Autom Control 31(9):803–812Google Scholar
  3. 30.
    Bertsekas D, Tsitsiklis JN (1997) Parallel and Distributed Computation: Numerical Methods. Athena Scientific, Belmont, MAGoogle Scholar
  4. 31.
    Jadbabaie A, Lin J, Morse A (2003) Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules. IEEE Trans Autom Control 48(6):988–1001Google Scholar
  5. 32.
    Olfati-Saber R, Murray R (2004) Consensus problems in networks of agents with switching topology and time-delays. IEEE Trans Autom Control 49(9):1520–1533Google Scholar
  6. 33.
    Fax J, Murray R (2004) Information flow and cooperative control of vehicle formations. IEEE Trans Autom Control 49(9):1465–1476Google Scholar
  7. 34.
    Leonard NE, Fiorelli E (2001) Virtual leaders, artificial potentials, and coordinated control of groups. In: Proc. IEEE Conf. Decision Control, Orlando, FL, pp. 2968–2973.Google Scholar
  8. 35.
    Gazi V, Passino KM (2003) Stability analysis of swarms. IEEE Trans.Autom Control 48(4):692–697Google Scholar
  9. 36.
    Gazi V, Passino KM (2004) Stability analysis of social foraging swarms. IEEE Trans Sys Man Cyber-Part B: Cybernetics 34(1):539–557Google Scholar
  10. 37.
    Ren W, Beard R (2005) Consensus seeking in multiagent systems under dynamically changing interaction topologies. IEEE Trans Autom Control 50(5):655–661Google Scholar
  11. 38.
    Moreau L (2005) Stability of multiagent systems with time-dependent communication links. IEEE Trans Autom Control 50(2):169–182CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 39.
    Ren W, Beard R, Atkins E (2005) A survey of consensus problems in multi-agent coordination. In: Proc. Amer. Control Conf., Portland, OR, pp. 1859–1864Google Scholar
  13. 40.
    Han J, Li M, Guo L (2006) Soft control on collective behavior of a group of autonomous agents by a shill agent. J Syst Sci Complexity 19:54–62CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 41.
    Ren W, Beard R, Atkins E (2007) Information consensus in multivehicle cooperative control. IEEE Control Syst Mag 27(2):71–82Google Scholar
  15. 42.
    Ren W, Moore K, Chen Y (2007) High-order and model reference consensus algorithms in cooperative control of multivehicle systems. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 129(5):678–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 43.
    Olfati-Saber R, Fax J, Murray R (2007) Consensus and cooperation in networked multi-agent systems. Proc IEEE 95(1):215–233Google Scholar
  17. 44.
    Zhu W, Cheng D (2010) Leader-following consensus of second-order agents with multiple time-varying delays. Automatica 46(12):1994–1999CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 45.
    Ren W, Cao C (2011) Distributed Coordination of Multi-Agent Networks: Emergent Problems, Models, and Issues. Springer-Verlag, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank L. Lewis
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hongwei Zhang
    • 2
  • Kristian Hengster-Movric
    • 3
  • Abhijit Das
    • 4
  1. 1.UTA Research InstituteUniversity of Texas at ArlingtonFort WorthUSA
  2. 2.School of Electrical EngineeringSouthwest Jiaotong UniversityChengduChina, People’s Republic
  3. 3.UTA Research InstituteUniversity of Texas at ArlingtonFort WorthUSA
  4. 4.Advanced Systems Engineering​Danfoss Power Solutions (US) Company​AmesUSA

Personalised recommendations