Advertisement

The Emergence of Modern Toxicology

  • Philip C. Burcham
Chapter

Abstract

Many ancient societies exhibited astute awareness of poisonous substances: their rudimentary ‘toxicology communities’ likely included physicians who used toxic plants and metals for therapeutic purposes as well as ‘professional poisoners’ who offered their services to political leaders for the elimination of unwanted rivals. Eventually, the emergence of modern chemistry began unleashing the economic and scientific powers of chemical substances, and evidence for their harmful effects accumulated as the Industrial Age unfolded. Incisive descriptions of occupational diseases by astute physicians such as Paracelsus, Pott and Rehn were of groundbreaking significance to toxicology. Soon after, pioneers such as Fontana, Orfila and Christison laid the foundations for experimental toxicology by studying chemical toxicity in animals. Yet no event was more important to the development of toxicology than the thalidomide disaster of the early 1960s. A flurry of activity saw toxicology-focussed societies, journals, regulatory agencies and research institutions established around the world. Toxicology today is a highly evolved, multidisciplinary endeavour that develops its own conceptual frameworks while also drawing upon advances in the chemical, medical and biological sciences.

Keywords

Poisons History Paracelsus Felice Fontana Mathieu Orfila Robert Christison Percival Pott Ludwig Rehn Frances Kelsey Rachel Carson 

Going Further

  1. Bartrip P. A “pennurth of arsenic for rat poison”: the Arsenic Act, 1851 and the prevention of secret poisoning. Med Hist. 1992;36:53–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell P. The devil’s doctor: paracelsus and the world of Renaissance magic and science. London: William Hinemann; 2006.Google Scholar
  3. Borzelleca JF. The art, science, and the seduction of toxicology: an evolutionary development, chapter 1. In: Hayes AW, editor. Principles and methods of toxicology. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis; 2001. p. 1–21.Google Scholar
  4. Earles MP. Early theories on the mode of action of drugs and poisons. Ann Sci. 1961;17:97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Emsley J. The elements of murder: a history of poison. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  6. Langman LJ, Kapur BM. Toxicology: then and now. Clin Biochem. 2006;39:498–510.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Orfila M. A general system of toxicology. (This abridged English translation of Orfila’s 2-volume text was published M. Carey & Son (Philadelphia) in 1817 and is available for download from Google Books), 1812.Google Scholar
  8. Stephens T, Brynner R. Dark remedy: the impact of thalidomide and its revival as a vital medicine. New York: Basic Books; 2005.Google Scholar
  9. Wax PM. Elixirs, diluents, and the passage of the 1938 federal food, drug and cosmetic act. Ann Intern Med. 1995;122:456–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Zapp JA, Doull J. Industrial toxicology: retrospect and prospect, chapter 1. In: Clayton GD, Clayton FE, editors. Patty’s industrial hygiene and toxicology, vol. 2. 4th ed. New York: Wiley; 1993. p. 1–23.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philip C. Burcham
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Medicine and PharmacologyThe University of Western AustraliaPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations