Abstract
Central alexia, also known as alexia with agraphia, occurs when reading is affected along with other aspects of language function (speaking, writing, or comprehension). Traditionally it has been split into three canonical types based on the type of errors different patients make when reading different classes of words. Indeed, these different error types are what the traditional neuropsychological models of reading have been built on. Two of the three subtypes can be considered mirror images of each other and are responsible for the main models of reading having to explain how it is possible to get from print to the spoken word via at least two separate routes.
Patients with surface dyslexia tend to overly rely on “rule-based” reading and will thus misread irregularly spelt words, e.g., [colonel], but will have no problem with words they have never encountered before, e.g., nonwords like [deggle]. Patients with phonological dyslexia on the other hand can often read irregular words (if they are familiar with them) but cannot read novel words like [deggle]. Deep dyslexia is probably on a continuum with phonological dyslexia; patients with this disorder show additional part-of-speech effects; that is, they have more trouble with rare words (low frequency), words that have little semantic association (functors such as [with]) and nonwords. We cover the theoretical background to these conditions and discuss their nosology and the many therapeutic efforts made to remediate them.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Dejerine J. Sur un cas de cécité verbale avec agraphie, suivi d’autopsie. CR Société du Biologie. 1891;43:197–201.
Benson FD. The third alexia. Arch Neurol. 1977;34:327–31.
Damasio AR. Varieties and significance of the alexias. Arch Neurol. 1977;34:325–6.
Shallice T, Warrington EK, Mccarthy R. Reading without semantics. Q J Exper Psychol Sect A Human Exper Psychol. 1983;35:111–38.
Jared D, Mcrae K, Seidenberg MS. The basis of consistency effects in word naming. J Memory Lang. 1990;29:687–715.
Glushko RJ. Organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1979;5:674–91.
Van Orden GC, Pennington BF, Stone GO. What do double dissociations prove? Cognit Sci. 2001;25:111–72.
Marshall JC, Newcombe F. Patterns of paralexia: a psycholinguistic approach. J Psycholinguist Res. 1973;2:175–99.
Lyman RS, Kwan ST, Chao WH. Left occipito-parietal brain tumor with observations on alexia and agraphia in Chinese and in English. Chin Med J. 1938;3:491–516.
Warrington EK. The selective impairment of semantic memory. Q J Exp Psychol. 1975;27:635–57.
Tulving G. Episodic and semantic memory. In: Tulving G, Donaldson W, editors. Organization of memory. New York/London: Academic; 1972.
Coltheart M, Masterson J, Byng S, et al. Surface dyslexia. Q J Exper Psychol Sect A Human Exper Psychol. 1983;35:469–95.
Patterson K, Hodges JR. Deterioration of word meaning: implications for reading. Neuropsychologia. 1992;30:1025–40.
Arsland D, Larsen JP, Hoien T. Alexia in dementia of the Alzheimer’s type. Acta Neurol Scand. 1993;88:434–9.
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, Mchugh PR. Mini-mental state – practical method for grading cognitive state of patients for clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189–98.
Patterson KE, Graham N, Hodges JR. Reading in dementia of the Alzheimer type: a preserved ability? Neuropsychology. 1994;8:395–412.
Watt S, Jokel R, Behrmann M. Surface dyslexia in nonfluent progressive aphasia. Brain Lang. 1997;56:211–33.
Westbury C, Bub D. Primary progressive aphasia: a review of 112 cases. Brain Lang. 1997;60:381–406.
Hodges JR, Patterson K, Ward R, et al. The differentiation of semantic dementia and frontal lobe dementia (temporal and frontal variants of frontotemporal dementia) from early Alzheimer’s disease: a comparative neuropsychological study. Neuropsychology. 1999;13:31–40.
Nelson HE, Willison J. The National Adult Reading Test (NART:2): test manual. Windsor: NFER-Nelson; 1991.
McMonagle P, Deering F, Berliner Y, Kertesz A. The cognitive profile of posterior cortical atrophy. Neurology. 2006;66:331–8.
Crutch SJ, Warrington EK. The relationship between visual crowding and letter confusability: towards an understanding of dyslexia in posterior cortical atrophy. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2009;26:471–98.
Yong KX, Warren JD, Warrington EK, Crutch SJ. Intact reading in patients with profound early visual dysfunction. Cortex. 2013. Epub ahead of print. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2013.01.009.
Crutch SJ. Seeing why they cannot see: understanding the syndrome and causes of posterior cortical atrophy. J Neuropsychol. 2013. Epub ahead of print. doi:10.1111/jnp.12011.
Formaglio M, Krolak-Salmon P, Tilikete C, et al. Homonymous hemianopia and posterior cortical atrophy. Rev Neurol. 2009;165:256–62.
Fushimi T, Ijuin M, Patterson K, Tatsumi IF. Consistency, frequency, and lexicality effects in naming Japanese Kanji. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1999;25:382–407.
Fushimi T, Komori K, Ikeda M, et al. The association between semantic dementia and surface dyslexia in Japanese. Neuropsychologia. 2009;47:1061–8.
Patterson K, Suzuki T, Wydell T, Sasanuma S. Progressive aphasia and surface alexia in Japanese. Neurocase. 1995;1:155–65.
Woollams AM, Ralph MAL, Plaut DC, Patterson K. SD-squared: on the association between semantic dementia and surface dyslexia. Psychol Rev. 2007;114:316–39.
Blazely AM, Coltheart M, Casey BJ. Semantic impairment with and without surface dyslexia: Implications for models of reading. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2005;22:695–717.
Beauvois M-F, Derouesne J. Phonological alexia: three dissociations. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1979;42:1115–24.
Cohen L, Dehaene S, Verstichel P. Number words and number Non-words – a case of deep dyslexia extending to Arabic numerals. Brain. 1994;117:267–79.
Funnell E. Phonological processes in reading – new evidence from acquired dyslexia. Br J Psychol. 1983;74:159–80.
Bradley VA, Thomson ME. Residual ability to use grapheme phoneme conversion rules in phonological dyslexia. Brain Lang. 1984;22:292–302.
Friedman RB. Two types of phonological alexia. Cortex. 1995;31:397–403.
Tree JJ. Two types of phonological dyslexia – a contemporary review. Cortex. 2008;44:698–706.
Nolan KA, Caramazza A. Modality-independent impairments in word-processing in a deep dyslexic patient. Brain Lang. 1982;16:237–64.
Bisiacchi PS, Cipolotti L, Denes G. Impairment in processing meaningless verbal material in several modalities – the relationship between short-term-memory and phonological skills. Q J Exper Psychol Sect A Human Exper Psychol. 1989;41:293–319.
Tree JJ, Kay J. Phonological dyslexia and phonological impairment: an exception to the rule? Neuropsychologia. 2006;44:2861–73.
Jefferies E, Sage K, Ralph MAL. Do deep dyslexia, dysphasia and dysgraphia share a common phonological impairment? Neuropsychologia. 2007;45:1553–70.
Nickels L, Biedermann B, Coltheart M, et al. Computational modelling of phonological dyslexia: how does the DRC model fare? Cogn Neuropsychol. 2008;25:165–93.
Rapcsak SZ, Beeson PM, Henry ML, et al. Phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia: cognitive mechanisms and neural substrates. Cortex. 2009;45:575–91.
Kay J, Lesser R, Coltheart M. Psycholinguistic assessments of language processing in aphasia (PALPA): reading and spelling. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1992.
Woollams AM, Patterson K. The consequences of progressive phonological impairment for reading aloud. Neuropsychologia. 2012;50:3469–77.
Schofield TM, Penny WD, Stephan KE, et al. Changes in auditory feedback connections determine the severity of speech processing deficits after stroke. J Neurosci. 2012;32:4260–70.
Franz SI. The relations of aphasia. J Gen Psychol. 1930;3:401–11.
Goldstein K. Language and language disturbances. New York: Grune & Stratton; 1948.
Lhermitte J, Lecours AR, Ouvry B. Essai d’analyse structurale des paralexies et des paragraphies. Acta Neurol Psych Belg. 1967;67:1021–1044
Patterson KE. What is right with deep dyslexic patients. Brain Lang. 1979;8:111–29.
Friedman RB, Perlman MB. On the underlying causes of semantic paralexias in a patient with deep dyslexia. Neuropsychologia. 1982;20:559–68.
Gerhand S, Barry C. When does a deep dyslexic make a semantic error? The roles of age-of-acquisition, concreteness, and frequency. Brain Lang. 2000;74:26–47.
Funnell E. Morphological errors in acquired dyslexia – a case of mistaken identity. Q J Exper Psychol Sect A Human Exper Psychol. 1987;39:497–539.
Rastle K, Tyler LK, Marslen-Wilson W. New evidence for morphological errors in deep dyslexia. Brain Lang. 2006;97:189–99.
Friedman RB. Recovery from deep alexia to phonological alexia: points on a continuum. Brain Lang. 1996;52:114–28.
Crisp J, Ralph MAL. Unlocking the nature of the phonological-deep dyslexia continuum: the keys to reading aloud are in phonology and semantics. J Cogn Neurosci. 2006;18:348–62.
Price CJ, Seghier ML, Leff AP. Predicting language outcome and recovery after stroke: the PLORAS system. Nat Rev Neurol. 2010;6:202–10.
Swinburn K, Porter G, Howard D. Comprehensive aphasia test. Hove: Psychology Press; 2004.
Ciaghi M, Pancheri E, Miceli G. Semantic paralexias: a group-case study on the underlying functional mechanisms, incidence and clinical features in a consecutive series of 340 Italian aphasics. Brain Lang. 2010;115:121–32.
Friedman RB, Robinson SR. Whole-word training therapy in a stable surface alexic patient – it works. Aphasiology. 1991;5:521–7.
Biedermann B, Nickels L. The representation of homophones: more evidence from the remediation of anomia. Cortex. 2008;44:276–93.
Moss SE, Gonzalez Rothi LJ, Fennell EB. Treating a case of surface dyslexia after closed head injury. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 1991;6:35–47.
Weekes B, Coltheart M. Surface dyslexia and surface dysgraphia: treatment studies and their theoretical implications. Cogn Neuropsychol. 1996;13:277–315.
Kendall DL, McNeil MR, Small SL. Rule-based treatment for acquired phonological dyslexia. Aphasiology. 1998;12:587–600.
Friedman RB, Sample DM, Lott SN. The role of level of representation in the use of paired associate learning for rehabilitation of alexia. Neuropsychologia. 2002;40:223–34.
Lott SN, Sample DM, Oliver RT, et al. A patient with phonologic alexia can learn to read “much” from “mud pies”. Neuropsychologia. 2008;46:2515–23.
Friedman RB, Lott SN. Successful blending in a phonological reading treatment for deep alexia. Aphasiology. 2002;16:355–72.
Kim M, Beaudoin-Parsons D. Training phonological reading in deep alexia: does it improve reading words with low imageability? Clin Linguist Phon. 2007;21:321–51.
Kiran S, Thompson CK, Hashimoto N. Training grapheme to phoneme conversion in patients with oral reading and naming deficits: a model-based approach. Aphasiology. 2001;15:855–76.
Mitchum CC, Berndt RS. Diagnosis and treatment of the non-lexical route in acquired dyslexia: an illustration of the cognitive neuropsychological approach. J Neurolinguist. 1991;6:103–37.
Yampolsky S, Waters G. Treatment of single word oral reading in an individual with deep dyslexia. Aphasiology. 2002;16:455–71.
Nickels L. The autocue? self-generated phonemic cues in the treatment of a disorder of reading and naming. Cogn Neuropsychol. 1992;9:155–82.
de Partz MPD. Re-education of a deep dyslexic patient: rationale of the method and results. Cogn Neuropsychol. 1986;3:149–77.
Bruce C, Howard D. Why don’t Broca’s aphasics cue themselves? An investigation of phonemic cueing and tip of the tongue information. Neuropsychologia. 1988;26:253–64.
Ska B, Garneau-Beaumont D, Chesneau S, Damien B. Diagnosis and rehabilitation attempt of a patient with acquired deep dyslexia. Brain Cogn. 2003;53:359–63.
Leff AP, Schofield TM, Crinion JT, et al. The left superior temporal gyrus is a shared substrate for auditory short-term memory and speech comprehension: evidence from 210 patients with stroke. Brain. 2009;132:3401–10.
Stadie N, Rilling E. Evaluation of lexically and nonlexically based reading treatment in a deep dyslexic. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2006;23:643–72.
Code HC. Services for aphasia, other acquired adult neurogenic communication and swallowing disorders in the United Kingdom, 2000. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25:1231–7.
Katz RC, Wertz RT. The efficacy of computer-provided reading treatment for chronic aphasic adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997;40:493–507.
Porch B. Porch Index of Communicative Ability (PICA). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1981.
Cherney LR. Oral Reading for Language in Aphasia (ORLA): Evaluating the efficacy of computer-delivered therapy in chronic nonfluent aphasia. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2010;17:423–31.
Kertesz A. The western aphasia battery. New York: Grune & Stratton; 1982.
Price CJ, Howard D, Patterson K, et al. A functional neuroimaging description of two deep dyslexic patients. J Cogn Neurosci. 1998;10:303–15.
Coltheart M. Deep dyslexia is right-hemisphere reading. Brain Lang. 2000;71:299–309.
Adair JC, Nadeau SE, Conway TW, et al. Alterations in the functional anatomy of reading induced by rehabilitation of an alexic patient. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol. 2000;13:303–11.
Kurland J, Cortes CR, Wilke M, et al. Neural mechanisms underlying learning following semantic mediation treatment in a case of phonologic alexia. Brain Imaging Behav. 2008;2:147.
Woodhead ZV, Barnes GR, Penny W, et al. Reading front to back: MEG evidence for early feedback effects during word recognition. Cereb Cortex. 2012. Epub ahead of print. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs365.
Woodhead ZVJ, Penny W, Barnes GR, et al. Reading therapy strengthens top-down connectivity in patients with pure alexia. Brain. 2013;136(Pt 8):2579–91.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Leff, A., Starrfelt, R. (2014). Central Alexia. In: Alexia. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5529-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5529-4_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5528-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5529-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)