Toward a Sustainable Technopolis
The chapter offers observations on what makes a technopolis sustainable, and how a technopolis contributes to the sustainability of society outside the technopolis’ boundaries. Each technopolis project must attend to sustainability in the scientific/engineering arena, in the social arena, and in the arena of environment and the triple bottom line. The chapter offers criticism of common concepts of sustainability, suggesting that technopolis designers and scientists are well positioned to sharpen our views and practices regarding sustainability.
KeywordsSocial Capital Triple Bottom Line Islamic Banking Science Park Cluster Theory
- City Club of Portland. (2000). Building a Sustainable Future for Portland. City Club of Portland Information Report, November, 2000.Google Scholar
- Phillips. F., & Eto, M. (Eds.). (1998). Special section revitalizing university research and its contribution to society. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 57(3), 205–265.Google Scholar
- Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
- Hall, P. (1998). Cities in civilization: culture, technology, and urban order. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson. New York, Pantheon Books, 1998.Google Scholar
- Institute of Islamic Banking and Insurance. (2009). Retrieved September 2000, from www.islamic-banking.com/prohibition_of_interest.aspx, posted September 2009.
- Kyaw, A. (2001). Technopolis and regional development in Japan: A statistical analysis. Geogr Rep Tokyo Metrop University., 36, 59–68.Google Scholar
- Linstone, H., & Mitroff, I. (1994) The challenge of the 21st century: managing technology and ourselves in a shrinking world. New York, Suny Press.Google Scholar
- Mukherjee, A. (2005). Can Singapore Become a Fun City? Bloomberg News Service. Retrieved April 21, 2005, from http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000039&sid=aBfOvonc_Yr4&refer=columnist_mukherjee.
- Norris, R. (2007). Global Instability: Climate change is about to come home to roost. San Diego Union-Tribune, B1, December 6 2007.Google Scholar
- Phillips, F. (2005). Toward an intellectual and theoretical foundation for ‘shared prosperity’. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 18(6), 547–568.Google Scholar
- Phillips, F. (2009a). Assessing and enhancing the impact of innovation and entrepreneurship. Chapter 15. In F. Phillips (Ed.), Managing Innovation, Technology, and Entrepreneurship. Aachen: Meyer & Meyer Media.Google Scholar
- Solow, R. (1991). Sustainability: An Economist’s Perspective. Eighteenth J. Seward Johnson Lecture, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, June 14, 1991.Google Scholar
- Sölvell, Ö., Lindqvist, G., & Ketels, C. (2003). The Cluster initiative greenbook. Gothenburg: Ivory Tower.Google Scholar
- Suzuki, S. (2004). Technopolis: science parks in Japan. International Journal of Technology Management 28(3–6) 582–601.Google Scholar
- World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our Common Future. (Oxford, Great Britain: Oxford University Press, 1987, p. 8). (Known as the Brundtland report, after Gro Harlem Brundtland, Chair of the Commission).Google Scholar