Technopolis pp 169-183 | Cite as

Toward a Sustainable Technopolis

  • Fred Phillips


The chapter offers observations on what makes a technopolis sustainable, and how a technopolis contributes to the sustainability of society outside the technopolis’ boundaries. Each technopolis project must attend to sustainability in the scientific/engineering arena, in the social arena, and in the arena of environment and the triple bottom line. The chapter offers criticism of common concepts of sustainability, suggesting that technopolis designers and scientists are well positioned to sharpen our views and practices regarding sustainability.


Social Capital Triple Bottom Line Islamic Banking Science Park Cluster Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. City Club of Portland. (2000). Building a Sustainable Future for Portland. City Club of Portland Information Report, November, 2000.Google Scholar
  2. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology Supplement, 94, S95–S120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Phillips. F., & Eto, M. (Eds.). (1998). Special section revitalizing university research and its contribution to society. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 57(3), 205–265.Google Scholar
  4. Eto, H. (2005). Obstacles to emergence of high/new technology parks, ventures and clusters in Japan. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72(3), 359–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  6. Hall, P. (1998). Cities in civilization: culture, technology, and urban order. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson. New York, Pantheon Books, 1998.Google Scholar
  7. Institute of Islamic Banking and Insurance. (2009). Retrieved September 2000, from, posted September 2009.
  8. Kyaw, A. (2001). Technopolis and regional development in Japan: A statistical analysis. Geogr Rep Tokyo Metrop University., 36, 59–68.Google Scholar
  9. Linstone, H., & Mitroff, I. (1994) The challenge of the 21st century: managing technology and ourselves in a shrinking world. New York, Suny Press.Google Scholar
  10. Mukherjee, A. (2005). Can Singapore Become a Fun City? Bloomberg News Service. Retrieved April 21, 2005, from
  11. Norris, R. (2007). Global Instability: Climate change is about to come home to roost. San Diego Union-Tribune, B1, December 6 2007.Google Scholar
  12. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Phillips, F. (2005). Toward an intellectual and theoretical foundation for ‘shared prosperity’. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 18(6), 547–568.Google Scholar
  14. Phillips, F. (2006). Social culture high tech economic development: The Technopolis columns. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Phillips, F. (2008a). Change in socio-technical systems: Researching the Multis, the Biggers, and the More Connecteds. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(5), 721–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Phillips, F. (2008b). The Godfathers: Characteristics and roles of central individuals in the transformation of techno-regions. Journal of Centrum Cathedra, 1(2), 12–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Phillips, F. (2009a). Assessing and enhancing the impact of innovation and entrepreneurship. Chapter 15. In F. Phillips (Ed.), Managing Innovation, Technology, and Entrepreneurship. Aachen: Meyer & Meyer Media.Google Scholar
  18. Solow, R. (1991). Sustainability: An Economist’s Perspective. Eighteenth J. Seward Johnson Lecture, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, June 14, 1991.Google Scholar
  19. Sölvell, Ö., Lindqvist, G., & Ketels, C. (2003). The Cluster initiative greenbook. Gothenburg: Ivory Tower.Google Scholar
  20. Suzuki, S. (2004). Technopolis: science parks in Japan. International Journal of Technology Management 28(3–6) 582–601.Google Scholar
  21. World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our Common Future. (Oxford, Great Britain: Oxford University Press, 1987, p. 8). (Known as the Brundtland report, after Gro Harlem Brundtland, Chair of the Commission).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Technology & Society, College of Engineering and Applied SciencesStony Brook University—State University of New YorkIncheonKorea (Rep.)

Personalised recommendations