Abstract
This case illustrates the importance of follow-up imaging post-EVAR to detect modular disconnection and describes the management in one such case.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Further Reading
Chuter TA. Stent-graft design: the good, the bad and the ugly. Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;10(1):7–13.
Draney MT, Zarins CK, Taylor CA. Three-dimensional analysis of renal artery bending motion during respiration. J Endovasc Ther. 2005;12(3):380–6.
Kaandorp DW, Vasbinder GB, de Haan MW, Kemerink GJ, van Engelshoven JM. Motion of the proximal renal artery during the cardiac cycle. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;12(6):924–8.
Muhs BE, Verhoeven EL, Zeebregts CJ, Tielliu IF, Prins TR, Verhagen HJ, et al. Mid-term results of endovascular aneurysm repair with branched and fenestrated endografts. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44(1):9–15.
Powell A, Benenati JF, Becker GJ, Katzen BT, Zemel G, Tummala S. Postoperative management: type I and III endoleaks. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;4(4):227–31.
Schlosser FJ, Mojibian HR, Dardik AL, Verhagen HJ, Muhs BE. Pitfalls and complications of fenestrated and branched endografts. Endovascular Today. 2008(February):56–61.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Allison, R.P. et al. (2014). Branch Endograft Disconnection and Impending Type 3 Endoleak Post-EVAR. In: Ratnam, L., Patel, U., Belli, A. (eds) Managing Common Interventional Radiology Complications. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5502-7_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5502-7_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5501-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5502-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)