Hacking Europe pp 219-239

Part of the History of Computing book series (HC)

Users in the Dark: The Development of a User-Controlled Technology in the Czech Wireless Network Community

Chapter

Abstract

“Ronja” is a piece of hardware used for sending data by means of visible light. The technology was developed by users in the Czech wireless network community. The philosophy behind the project states that anyone lacking previous knowledge of electronics should be able to build the device by themselves. In order to realize this vision, the mechanics and electronics were designed with generally available and off-the-shelf components. The instructions for building the device are published on the Internet under a free license. These principles have been summarized under the label “user-controlled technology.” At the center of the case study is a schism in the Czech wireless community over the commercialization of Ronja. The article looks at how the growing market demand for free space optics in the Czech wireless community called forth a redesign of the product in line with the requirements of mass production. The relation between a “democratization of innovation” and the entrepreneurship that flourished around the product was marked by internal tensions.

Bibliography

  1. Amsterdamska, Olga. 1990. Surely you are joking, Monsieur Latour. Science, Technology & Human Values 15(4): 495–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldwin, Carliss, Eric von Hippel, and Christoph Hienerth. 2006. How user innovations become commercial products: A theoretical investigation and case stud. Research Policy 35: 1291–1313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balka, Kerstin, Christina Raasch, and Cornelius Herstatt. 2009. Open source enters the world of atoms: A statistical analysis of open design. First Monday 14(11). Accessed 5 May 2013.Google Scholar
  4. Barbrook, Richard. 1987. A new way of talking: Community radio in 1980s Britain. Science as Culture 1(1): 81–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. COM. 2009. Progress report on the single European electronic communications market 2007, 14th report. 24 March 2009. Brussels: EC.Google Scholar
  6. Daston, Lorraine. 2009. Science studies and the history of science. Critical Inquiry 35(4): 798–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dunbar-Hester, Christina. 2009. ‘Free the spectrum!’ Activist encounters with old and new media technology. New Media & Society 11(1–2): 221–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Flyvbjerg, Bent. 2006. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry 12(2): 219–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Glettler, Monika. 1982. The organization of the Czech clubs in Vienna circa 1900: A national minority in an imperial capital. East Central Europe 9(1): 124–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jamison, Andrew, and Mikael Hård. 2003. The storylines of technological change: Innovation, construction and appropriation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 15(1): 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Johns, Adrian. 2009. Piracy as a business force. Culture Machine 10, 44–63. Accessed 5 May 2013.Google Scholar
  12. Kera, Denisa. 2012. Hackerspaces and DIY-bio in Asia: Connecting science and community with open data, kits and protocols. Journal of Peer Production 1(2), 1–8. http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-2/peer-reviewed-papers/diybio-in-asia/. Accessed 5 May 2013.
  13. Klvač, Pavel, et al. (ed.). 2007. Na tom našem dvoře Kličova. Prague: KSB.Google Scholar
  14. Maxigas. 2012. Hacklabs and hackerspaces: Tracing two genealogies. Journal of Peer Production 1(2), 1–10. http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-2/peer-reviewed-papers/hacklabs-and-hackerspaces/. Accessed 5 May 2013.
  15. Nevejan, Caroline, and Alexander Badenoch. 2014. How Amsterdam invented the Internet: European networks of significance, 1980–1995. In Hacking Europe. From computer cultures to demoscenes, ed. Gerard Alberts and Ruth Oldenziel, 189–217. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Oldenziel, Ruth, Adri Albert de la Bruhèze, and Onno de Wit. 2005. Europe’s mediation junction: Technology and consumer society in the twentieth century. History and Technology 21(1): 107–139.Google Scholar
  17. Oost, Ellen, Stephan Verhaegh, and Nelly Oudshoorn. 2009. From innovation community to community innovation: User-initiated innovation in wireless Leiden. Science, Technology & Human Values 34(184): 182–205.Google Scholar
  18. Pestre, Dominique. 2004. Thirty years of science studies: Knowledge, society and the political. History and Technology: An International Journal 20(4): 351–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pestre, Dominique. 2013. À contre-science – Politique et savoirs des sociétés contemporaines. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  20. Rabeharisoa, Vololona, and Michel Callon. 2003. Research ‘in the wild’ and the shaping of new social identities. Technology in Society 25(2): 193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sandvig, Christian. 2004. An initial assessment of cooperative action in Wi-Fi networking. Telecommunications Policy 28(7–8): 579–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shah, Sonali. 2006. Open beyond software. In Open sources 2.0 – The continuing evolution, ed. Chris DiBona, Danese Cooper, and Mark Stone, 339–360. Beijing: O’Reilly.Google Scholar
  23. Söderberg, Johan, and Adam Netzén. 2010. When all that is theory melts into (hot) air: Contrasts and parallels between actor network theory, autonomist Marxism, and open Marxism. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization 10(2): 95–118.Google Scholar
  24. Turner, Fred. 2006. From counterculture to cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the rise of digital utopianism. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. von Hippel, Eric. 2005. Open source projects as user innovation networks. In Perspectives on free and open source software, ed. Joseph Feller, et al., 267–278. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  26. WifiSoft.org Foundation. 2007. Annual report 2007. http://wifisoft.org/trac/.
  27. Woolgar, Steve. 1991. Configuring the user: The case of usability trials. In A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination, ed. John Law, 57–102. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Interviews

  1. Bohac, Jiri, contributed mechanical inventions for Ronja, user of Ronja (Prague, September 14, 2008)Google Scholar
  2. de Stigter, Johan, running a company selling wireless equipment, sponsor of Ronja (telephone interview, September 30, 2008)Google Scholar
  3. Elias, Michal, experimented with Ronja design, vendor and user of Ronja (Prague, September 27, 2008)Google Scholar
  4. Gullik, Webjorn, experimented with Ronja design (phone interview, August 10, 2008)Google Scholar
  5. Hecko, Marcel, developed PCB for Ronja, administrator of a nonprofit, wireless network, user of Ronja (Bratislava, December 17, 2008)Google Scholar
  6. Horky, Jakub, vendor of Ronja (Prague, January 17, 2009)Google Scholar
  7. Hudec, Jan, tested the first versions of Ronja (Prague, December 8, 2008)Google Scholar
  8. Kamenicky, Tomas, developer of a second generation of free space optics (Prague, December 4, 2008)Google Scholar
  9. Krishnan, Arun, developer and user of Ronja in India (telephone interview, October 17, 2008)Google Scholar
  10. Kolovratnik, David, user of Ronja (Prague, December 14, 2008)Google Scholar
  11. Kulhavy, Karel, main developer of Ronja (Zurich, November 16, 2008)Google Scholar
  12. Michnik, Jakub, vendor of Ronja (Brno, December 17, 2008)Google Scholar
  13. Myslik, Lada, main developer of Crusader (Prague, January 9, 2008)Google Scholar
  14. Nemec, David, vendor of Ronja (Chrudim, December 14, 2008)Google Scholar
  15. Polak, Michael, running an Internet Service Provider, user of Ronja and Crusader (Prague, January 16, 2009)Google Scholar
  16. Seliger, Petr, developed PCB for Ronja, user of Ronja (Prague, October 21, 2008)Google Scholar
  17. Simandl, Petr, administrator of non-profit wireless network and independent developer of open hardware designs (October 27, 2008)Google Scholar
  18. Snajdrvint, Karel administrator of a non-profit wireless network, user of Ronja (Chrudim, December 14, 2008)Google Scholar
  19. Sykora, Jakub, user of Ronja (Prague, November 27, 2008)Google Scholar
  20. Tesar, Ondrej, developed PCB for Ronja, distributed light diodes, user of Ronja (Prague, October 5, 2008)Google Scholar
  21. Zajicek, Ondrej, administrator of nonprofit, wireless network, user of Ronja (Chrudim, December 14, 2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Göteborgs UniversitetGöteborgSweden
  2. 2.Laboratoire Techniques, Territoires et Sociétés/Institut Francilien Innovation et SociétéUniversité Paris-EstParisFrance

Personalised recommendations