Skip to main content

Characterizing the Nature of Work and Forces for Decision Making in Emergency Care

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cognitive Informatics in Health and Biomedicine

Abstract

Healthcare as a complex system [1] is exemplified in emergency medicine [2, 3]. Emergency Departments (EDs) are dynamic, adaptive, and self-organizing. Additionally, ED providers are faced with inherent unpredictability regarding the number and severity of patients, concurrent management of multiple individuals requiring timely responses, and a need to cope with limited resources all within a life-critical, interruption-laden environment [4]. The layered complexity of such units includes the functions of the work, the implementation of technology, the people, the activities and workflows jointly performed by the people and the technology, as well as the social, physical, cultural, and organizational environment in which the ED is embedded. Managing the cognitive, physical, spatial, and temporal resources in such systems is crucial for patient safety and quality of care. Understanding the interaction of the complexity of this work and the environment, particularly as it relates to decision-making, is a first step in engineering solutions to support physician efforts.

Section 3 is adapted from Franklin et al’s (2011) paper Opportunistic decision making and complexity in emergency care, Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 44, 469–476.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Plsek P, Greenhalgh T. The challenge of complexity in health care. BMJ. 2001;323:625–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith M, Feied C. The emergency department as a complex system. 1999. Available at: http://nesciorg/projects/yaneer/emergencydept.ex.pdf.

  3. Nugus P, Carroll K, Hewett DG, Short A, Forero R, Braithwaite J. Integrated care in the emergency department: a complex adaptive systems perspective. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(11):1997–2004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Croskerry P, Cosby K, Schenkel S, Wears R. Patient safety in emergency medicine. Philadelphia/London: Wolters Kluwer; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Butler KA, Zhang J, editors. Design models for interactive problem-solving: context & ontology, representation & routines. In: SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. Atlanta; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Butler K, Zhang J, Esposito C, Bahrami A, Hebron R, Kieras D. Work-centered design: a case study of a mixed initiative scheduler. In: Proceedings of CHI. California, USA: San Jose; 2007. p. 747–56.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Butler K, Zhang J, Hunt A, Huffer B, Muehleisen J. Ontology models for interaction design. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. Atlanta: ACM; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang J, Butler K, editors. UFuRT: A work-centered framework and process for design and evaluation of information systems. In: Proceedings of HCI International. Presented at: HCI International. Beijing, China; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang J, Walji M. TURF: toward a unified framework of EHR usability. J Biomed Inform. 2011;44(6):1056–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brank J, Grobelnik M, Mladenić D. A survey of ontology evaluation techniques. SIKDD 2005 at multiconference IS 2005; Oct 17 2005. Ljubljana.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Glaser B, Strauss A. The discovery of grounded theory. New York: Aldine Publishing; 1967. Klein GA, Orasanu J, Calderwood R, Zambok CE, editors. Decision making in action: models and methods. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhu M. Formalizing a conceptual framework of work domain knowledge [PhD]. Houston: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Beach LR, Lipshitz R. Why classical decision theory is an inappropriate standard for evaluating and aiding most human decision making. In: Klein GA, Oransanu J, Calderwood R, Zsambok CE, editors. Decision making in action: models and methods. Norwood: Alex; 1993. p. 21–35.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Klein GA, Orasanu J, Calderwood R, Zsambok CE, editors. Decision making in action: models and methods. Norwood: Ablex; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Beach LR, Lipshitz R. Why classical decision theory is an inappropriate standard for evaluating and aiding most human decision making. In: Klein GA, Oransanu J, Calderwood R, Zsambok CE, editors. Decision making in action: models and methods. Norwood: Ablex Publishing; 1993. p. 21–35.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bystrom KJK. Task complexity affects information seeking and use. Inf Process Manag. 1995;31:191–213.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chinburapa VLL, Brucks M, Draugalis JL, Bootman JL, Puto CP. Physician prescribing decisions: the effects of situational involvement and task complexity on information acquisition and decision making. Soc Sci Med. 1993;36:1473–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang J, Patel VL, Johnson TR, Shortliffe EH. A cognitive taxonomy of medical errors. J Biomed Inform. 2004;37:193–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Brixey JJ RD, Johnson CW, Johnson TR, Turley JP, Patel V, Zhang J. Towards a hybrid method to categorize interruptions and activities in healthcare. Int J Med Inform. 2007;76(11–12):812–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Newall A, Simon HA. Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rosch E. Principles of categorization. In: Rosch E, Lloyd B, editors. Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale: Erlbaum; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Smith E, Medin D. Categories and concepts. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Koch SH, Weir C, Westenskow D, Gondan M, Agutter J, Harr M, Liu D, Gorges M, Staggers N. Evaluation of the effect of information integration in displays for ICU nurses on situation awareness and task completion time: A prospective randomized controlled study. Int J Med Inform. 2013;82(8):665–75.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Liu Y. The Impact of Environmental Factors on Physician Decision Making in Emergency Department, Master’s Thesis, unpublished, University of Texas HSCH, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Aronsky D et al. Supporting patient care in the emergency department with a computerized whiteboard system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15:184–94.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy Franklin PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Franklin, A., Robinson, D.J., Zhang, J. (2014). Characterizing the Nature of Work and Forces for Decision Making in Emergency Care. In: Patel, V., Kaufman, D., Cohen, T. (eds) Cognitive Informatics in Health and Biomedicine. Health Informatics. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5490-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5490-7_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5489-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5490-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics