Improved Cementing Techniques and Femoral Component Loosening in Young Patients with Hip Arthroplasty: A 12-Year Radiographic Review

  • Paul A. Banaszkiewicz


Barrack RL, Mulroy RD Jr, Harris WH.


Femoral Component Aseptic Loosening Acetabular Component Femoral Stem Medullary Canal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Harris WH, McCarthy Jr JC, O’Neill DA. Femoral component loosening using contemporary techniques of femoral cement fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64(7):1063–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hodgkinson JP, Shelley P, Wroblewski BM. The correlation between the roentgenographic appearance and operative findings at the bone-cement junction of the socket in Charnley low friction arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;228:105–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mulroy WF, Harris WH. Acetabular and femoral fixation 15 years after cemented total hip surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;337:118.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Smith SW, Estok DM, Harris WH. Total hip arthroplasty with use of second-generation cementing techniques. An eighteen-year-average follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80(11):1632–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    El Masri F, Kerboull L, Kerboull M, Courpied JP, Hamadouche M. Is the so-called “French paradox” a reality? Long-term survival and migration of the Charnley-Kerboull stem cemented line-to-line. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92(3):342–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schmalzried TP, Harris WH. Hybrid total hip replacement. A 6.5-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75(4):608–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Amstutz HC, Markolf KL, McNeice GM, Gruen TA. Loosening of total hip components: cause and prevention. In: The hip. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby Co; 1976. p. 102–16.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beckenbaugh RD, Ilstrup DM. Total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60(3):306–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stauffer RN. Ten-year follow-up study of total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64(7):983–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sutherland CJ, Wilde AH, Borden LS, Marks KE. A ten-year follow-up of one hundred consecutive Muller curved-stem total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64(7):970.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mulroy RD, Harris WH. The effect of improved cementing techniques on component loosening in total hip replacement. An 11-year radiographic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72(5):757–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dorr LD, Takei GK, Conaty JP. Total hip arthroplasties in patients less than forty-five years old. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983;260(4):474.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    McCaskie AW, Brown AR, Thompson JR, Gregg PJ. Radiological evaluation of the interfaces after cemented total hip replacement. Interobserver and intraobserver agreement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78(2):191–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kelly AJ, Lee MB, Wong NS, Smith EJ, Learmonth ID. Poor reproducibility in radiographic grading of femoral cementing technique in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11(5):525–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Harvey EJ, Tanzer M, Bobyn JD. Femoral cement grading in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13(4):396–401.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Estok DM, Orr TE, Harris WH. Factors affecting cement strains near the tip of a cemented femoral component. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12(1):40–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dorr LD, Luckett M, Conaty JP. Total hip arthroplasties in patients younger than 45 years. A nine- to ten-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;260:215–219.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mulroy WF, Estok DM, Harris WH. Total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second-generation cementing techniques. A fifteen-year-average follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77(12):1845–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sanchez-Sotelo J, Berry DJ, Harmsen S. Long-term results of use of a collared matte-finished femoral component fixed with second-generation cementing techniques a fifteen-year-median follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84(9):1636–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chambers IR, Fender D, McCaskie AW, Reeves BC, Gregg PJ. Radiological features predictive of aseptic loosening in cemented Charnley femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83(6):838–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Malik MHA, Fisher N, Gray J, Wroblewski BM, Kay PR. Prediction of Charnley femoral stem aseptic loosening by early post-operative radiological features. Int Orthop. 2005;29(5):268–71.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rasquinha VJ, Dua V, Rodriguez JA, Ranawat CS. Fifteen-year survivorship of a collarless, cemented, normalized femoral stem in primary hybrid total hip arthroplasty with a modified third-generation cement technique. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18(7 Suppl 1):86–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Trauma and OrthopaedicsQueen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead, Northumbria UniversityNewcastle Upon TyneUK

Personalised recommendations