Arthroscopic Knot Tying

  • Jae-Chul YooEmail author
  • Young Eun Park


Arthroscopy has evolved from a merely diagnostic procedure to a therapeutic procedure, with most reconstructive procedures being done by arthroscopy. Suturing has been the cornerstone of all reconstructive surgeries to hold the tissues together and without excessive tension to facilitate healing and knot tying has been practiced for centuries. Arthroscopic shoulder reconstructive procedures also employ sutures and knots, and every shoulder surgeon must understand the principle and learn the technique of arthroscopic knots. Though the principles of repair are the same, arthroscopic reconstruction is different from open techniques in that suturing is much more difficult in arthroscopic procedures. The surgeon has to suture tissues at a distance, under the constraint of cannula and in a wet field. This necessitates the use of knot pusher and placement of knot with asymmetric tensioning of suture limbs. Surgeon does not have the benefit of tactile feedback as in tying open knots. Furthermore, the knot is often tightened at an acute angle to suture and not perpendicular to defect, an ideal situation described in open knotting.


Suture Material Ultrahigh Molecular Weight Polyethylene Suture Anchor Post Limb Shoulder Surgery 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Hammerman SM, Elkousy H, Edwards TB, O’Connor DP, Gartsman GM. The arthroscopic square knot: fiction or fact? Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2009;38:14–6.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baumgarten KM, Wright RW. Chapter 1: Suture properties. In: Arthroscopic knot tying: an instruction manual. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005. p. 6.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burkhart SS, Wirth MA, Simonich M, Salem D, Lanctot D, Athanasiou K. Knot security in simple sliding knots and its relationship to rotator cuff repair: how secure must the knot be? Arthroscopy. 2000;16:202–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Loutzenheiser TD, Harryman 2nd DT, Ziegler DW, Yung SW. Optimizing arthroscopic knots using braided or monofilament suture. Arthroscopy. 1998;14:57–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hughes PJ, Hagan RP, Fisher AC, Holt EM, Frostick SP. The kinematics and kinetics of slipknots for arthroscopic Bankart repair. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29:738–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tera H, Aberg C. Tensile strengths of twelve types of knot employed in surgery, using different suture materials. Acta Chir Scand. 1976;142:1–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Trimbos JB. Security of various knots commonly used in surgical practice. Obstet Gynecol. 1984;64:274–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Loutzenheiser TD, Harryman 2nd DT, Yung SW, France MP, Sidles JA. Optimizing arthroscopic knots. Arthroscopy. 1995;11: 199–206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Burkhart SS, Wirth MA, Simonick M, Salem D, Lanctot D, Athanasiou K. Loop security as a determinant of tissue fixation security. Arthroscopy. 1998;14:773–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Alan Barber F, Boothby MH, Richards DP. New sutures and suture anchors in sports medicine. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2006;14: 177–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Türker M, Kılıçoğlu O, Salduz A, Bozdağ E, Sünbüloğlu E. Loop security and tensile properties of polyblend and traditional suture materials. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19: 296–302.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mahar AT, Moezzi DM, Serra-Hsu F, Pedowitz RA. Comparison and performance characteristics of 3 different knots when tied with 2 suture materials used for shoulder arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:614.e1–2.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Barber FA, Herbert MA, Beavis RC. Cyclic load and failure behavior of arthroscopic knots and high strength sutures. Arthroscopy. 2009;25:192–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lo IK, Burkhart SS, Athanasiou K. Abrasion resistance of two types of nonabsorbable braided suture. Arthroscopy. 2004;20: 407–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Acton D, Perry A, Evans R, Butler A, Stephens P, Bruce W, et al. The effect of two nonresorbable suture types on the mechanical performance over a metal suture anchor eyelet. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2004;12:165–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kerin C, Patel N, Bale RS, Fisher AC, Hughes PJ. Arthroscopic knot pushers. Does one size fit all? Int J Clin Pract. 2008;62: 747–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Walker JC, Baumgarten KM, Wright RW. Arthroscopic knot tying principles and instrument. Oper Tech Sports Med. 2004;12:240–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chan KC, Burkhart SS, Thiagarajan P, Goh JC. Optimization of stacked half-hitch knots for arthroscopic surgery. Arthroscopy. 2001;17:752–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mishra DK, Cannon Jr WD, Lucas DJ, Belzer JP. Elongation of arthroscopically tied knots. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25:113–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    De Beer JF, van Rooyen K, Boezaart AP. Nicky’s knot–a new slipknot for arthroscopic surgery. Arthroscopy. 1998;14:109–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kim SH, Ha KI, Kim SH, Kim JS. Significance of the internal locking mechanism for loop security enhancement in the arthroscopic knot. Arthroscopy. 2001;17:850–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee TQ, Matsuura PA, Fogolin RP, Lin AC, Kim D, McMahon PJ. Arthroscopic suture tying: a comparison of knot types and suture materials. Arthroscopy. 2001;17:348–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Weston PV. A new clinch knot. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;78:144–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nottage WM, Lieurance RK. Arthroscopic knot tying techniques. Arthroscopy. 1999;15:515–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Soper NJ, Hunter JG. Suturing and knot tying in laparoscopy. Surg Clin North Am. 1992;72:1139–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hage JJ. On the origin and evolution of the Roeder knot and loop – a geometrical review. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2008;18:1–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fleega BA, Sokkar SH. The giant knot: a new one-way self-locking secured arthroscopic slipknot. Arthroscopy. 1999;15:451–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Field MH, Edwards TB, Savoie 3rd FH. Technical note: a “new” arthroscopic sliding knot. Orthop Clin North Am. 2001;32:525–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Balg F, Boileau P. The Mid-Ship knot: a new simple and secure sliding knot. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15:217–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dahl KA, Patton DJ, Dai Q, Wongworawat MD. Biomechanical characteristics of 9 arthroscopic knots. Arthroscopy. 2010;26:813–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Conca M, Taschieri S, Del Fabbro M, Conca R. Inverse knot: a personal sliding knot for arthrosopic surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15:620–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mochizuki Y, Hachisuka H, Natsu K, Kashiwagi K, Yasunaga Y, Ochi M. The HU knot: a new sliding knot for arthroscopic surgery. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:1014.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yiannakopoulos CK, Hiotis I, Antonogiannakis E. The triad knot: a new sliding self-locking knot. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:899.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wiley WB, Goradia VK. The Tuckahoe knot: a secure locking slip knot. Arthroscopy. 2004;20:556–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Baumgarten KM, Brodt MD, Silva MJ, Wright RW. An in vitro analysis of the mechanical properties of 16 arthroscopic knots. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16:957–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lo IK, Burkhart SS, Chan KC, Athanasiou K. Arthroscopic knots: determining the optimal balance of loop security and knot security. Arthroscopy. 2004;20:489–502.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kim SH, Yoo JC. Arthroscopic knot tying. Tech Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003;4:35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Elkousy HA, Sekiya JK, Stabile KJ, McMahon PJ. A biomechanical comparison of arthroscopic sliding and sliding-locking knots. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:204–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ilahi OA, Younas SA, Ho DM, Noble PC. Security of knots tied with ethibond, fiberwire, orthocord, or ultrabraid. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:2407–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Shah MR, Strauss EJ, Kaplan K, Jazrawi L, Rosen J. Initial loop and knot security of arthroscopic knots using high-strength sutures. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:884–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Punjabi VM, Bokor DJ, Pelletier MH, Walsh WR. The effect on loop elongation and stress relaxation during longitudinal loading of FiberWire in shoulder arthroscopic knots. Arthroscopy. 2011;27:750–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Livermore RW, Chong AC, Prohaska DJ, Cooke FW, Jones TL. Knot security, loop security, and elongation of braided polyblend sutures used for arthroscopic knots. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2010;39:569–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Williams DP, Hughes PJ, Fisher AC, Doherty P. Heat treatment of arthroscopic knots and its effect on knot security. Arthroscopy. 2008;24:7–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Baumgarten KM, Wright RW. Ease of tying arthroscopic knots. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16:438–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kitson J, Blake SM. A model for developing psychomotor skills in arthroscopic knot tying. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006;88:501–2.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopedic SurgerySamsung Medical CenterSeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations