Skip to main content

Pure Cartilage-Based Repair Modalities of Focal Cartilage Lesions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Developing Insights in Cartilage Repair
  • 1124 Accesses

Abstract

Focal cartilage lesions in diarthrodial joints have a limited capacity to heal, and repair techniques used at present are still unable to provide a universal solution. Osteochondral auto- and allografts are accepted and successful methods for the treatment of these lesions, but occasionally the osseal incorporation is delayed or insufficient and graft integration might be unsuccessful. Failure at this level generates a large osseos crater and the consequences can prove challenging.

Until just a few years ago, it was a generally accepted dogma that when cartilage is detached from the subchondral bone it would fail to reintegrate to its bed and its surrounding cartilage. Recently, innovative approaches have been established to repair cartilage defects using pure cartilage-based implants, and so far they seem to have had considerable success.

One of the available options is to use autologous minced cartilage in a single-stage procedure. Cartilage tissue is obtained from the less-weight-bearing surface of the affected joint and the sample is processed in situ resulting in a cartilage fragment-loaded scaffold that can be applied to the lesion of the weight-bearing area. Another system repairs with cadaveric juvenile articular hyaline cartilage cut into 1 mm3-cartilage cubes and using fibrin glue as vehicle the tissue particles are evenly distributed on the defected articular surface. Both methods are relatively new and therefore lacking long-term follow up, but the short-term results seem encouraging.

An additional concept for cartilage-based repair is when pure cartilage allograft is peeled from the subchondral bone, and instead of mincing the tissue it is repeatedly incised on its basilar surface rendering the rigid cartilage graft into a rather pliable graft. Since the superficial layer is preserved the graft is similar to any scaffold used in cartilage repair, and it can be secured to the lesion site using sutures and fibrin glue. Although this method is in the experimental phase, a short term clinical trial has proved it to be safe.

In this chapter we will briefly describe the physiology of cartilage integration; summarize the basis and the potential pitfalls of these methods; and provide a review of the available data on the clinical outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Buckwalter JA, Mankin HJ. Articular cartilage: degeneration and osteoarthritis, repair, regeneration, and transplantation. Instr Course Lect. 1998;47:487–504.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Namba RS, Meuli M, Sullivan KM, Le AX, Adzick NS. Spontaneous repair of superficial defects in articular cartilage in a fetal lamb model. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:4–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bardos T, Farkas B, Mezes B, et al. Osteochondral integration of multiply incised pure cartilage allograft: repair method of focal chondral defects in a porcine model. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37 Suppl 1:50S–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. DiMicco MA, Sah RL. Integrative cartilage repair: adhesive strength is correlated with collagen deposition. J Orthop Res. 2001;19:1105–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. DiMicco MA, Waters SN, Akeson WH, Sah RL. Integrative articular cartilage repair: dependence on developmental stage and collagen metabolism. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2002;10:218–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schaefer DB, Wendt D, Moretti M, et al. Lubricin reduces cartilage–cartilage integration. Biorheology. 2004;41:503–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Balint L, Park SH, Bellyei A, Luck Jr JV, Sarmiento A, Lovasz G. Repair of steps and gaps in articular fracture models. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;403:208–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hunziker EB. Articular cartilage repair: basic science and clinical progress. A review of the current status and prospects. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2002;10:432–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pap K, Krompecher S. Arthroplasty of the knee : experimental and clinical experiences. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1961;43:523–37.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bentley G, Greer III RB. Homotransplantation of isolated epiphyseal and articular cartilage chondrocytes into joint surfaces of rabbits. Nature. 1971;230:385–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Morales TI. Chondrocyte moves: clever strategies? Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007;15:861–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lyman JR, Chappell JD, Morales TI, Kelley SS, Lee GM. Response of chondrocytes to local mechanical injury in an Ex vivo model. Cartilage. 2012;3:58–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Huntley JS, Bush PG, McBirnie JM, Simpson AH, Hall AC. Chondrocyte death associated with human femoral osteochondral harvest as performed for mosaicplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:351–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bos PK, Kops N, Verhaar JA, van Osch GJ. Cellular origin of neocartilage formed at wound edges of articular cartilage in a tissue culture experiment. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008;16:204–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stone KR, Walgenbach AW. Surgical technique for articular cartilage transplantation to full thickness cartilage defects in the knee joint. Oper Tech Orthop. 1997;7:305–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Stone KR, Walgenbach AW, Freyer A, Turek TJ, Speer DP. Articular cartilage paste grafting to full-thickness articular cartilage knee joint lesions: a 2- to 12-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:291–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Frisbie DD, Lu Y, Kawcak CE, DiCarlo EF, Binette F, McIlwraith CW. In vivo evaluation of autologous cartilage fragment-loaded scaffolds implanted into equine articular defects and compared with autologous chondrocyte implantation. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37 Suppl 1:71S–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zheng N, Lu Y, Boock R, Conrad B, Binette F. Retention of scaffold with staple fixation for cartilage repair during cyclic motion of human cadaveric knees. J Musculoskelet Res. 2008;11:151–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lu Y, Dhanaraj S, Wang Z, et al. Minced cartilage without cell culture serves as an effective intraoperative cell source for cartilage repair. J Orthop Res. 2006;24:1261–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cole BJ, Farr J, Winalski CS, et al. Outcomes after a single-stage procedure for cell-based cartilage repair: a prospective clinical safety trial with 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39:1170–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Albrecht F, Roessner A, Zimmermann E. Closure of osteochondral lesions using chondral fragments and fibrin adhesive. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1983;101:213–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Adkisson HD, Gillis MP, Davis EC, Maloney W, Hruska KA. In vitro generation of scaffold independent neocartilage. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;391:S280–S94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Adkisson HD, Martin JA, Amendola RL, et al. The potential of human allogeneic juvenile chondrocytes for restoration of articular cartilage. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:1324–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stockwell RA. The interrelationship of cell density and cartilage thickness in mammalian articular cartilage. J Anat. 1971;109:411–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Farr J, Yao JQ. Chondral defect repair with particulated juvenile cartilage allograft. Cartilage. 2012;4:346–53.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kruse DL, Ng A, Paden M, Stone PA. Arthroscopic De Novo NT((R)) juvenile allograft cartilage implantation in the talus: a case presentation. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012;51:218–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bonner KF, Daner W, Yao JQ. 2-year postoperative evaluation of a patient with a symptomatic full-thickness patellar cartilage defect repaired with particulated juvenile cartilage tissue. J Knee Surg. 2010;23:109–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The author gratefully acknowledges the help from Brian J. Cole, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Jack Farr, Orthoindy Cartilage Restoration Center, Greenwood, IN; David D. Frisbie, Orthopaedic Research Center, CSU, Fort Collins, CO and Patrick D. Reischling, Clinical Affairs Biologics, Zimmer.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tamas Bardos MD, PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bardos, T. (2014). Pure Cartilage-Based Repair Modalities of Focal Cartilage Lesions. In: Emans, P., Peterson, L. (eds) Developing Insights in Cartilage Repair. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5385-6_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5385-6_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5384-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5385-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics