Advertisement

Environmental Sustainability Assessment of Ethanol from Cassava and Sugarcane Molasses in a Life Cycle Perspective

  • Shabbir H. Gheewala
Chapter
Part of the Green Energy and Technology book series (GREEN)

Abstract

Liquid transportation fuels derived from biomass (biofuels) are widely promoted inter alia due to their perceived environmental benefits. The environmental sustainability of biofuels, however, must be rigorously tested using scientific tools. Several such tools, namely net energy ratio (NER), net energy balance (NEB), renewability, and life cycle assessment (LCA), are defined and then used to analyze the environmental sustainability of ethanol produced from cassava and sugarcane molasses in Thailand. These studies show the utility of such tools in the evaluation and also point various areas of improvement. Use of renewable energy sources in the supply chain, utilization of co-products as well as waste products, and good management practices at the farm such as use of organic fertilizers are some of the options that can help improve the environmental benefits of biofuels.

Keywords

Life Cycle Assessment Ethanol Production Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket Entire Life Cycle Sugar Mill 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Blottnitz HV, Curran MA (2007) A review of assessments conducted on bio-ethanol as a transportation fuel from a net energy, greenhouse gas, and environmental life cycle perspective. J Clean Prod 15(7):607–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Daniel R, Lebel L, Gheewala SH (2010) Agrofuels in Thailand: policies, practices and prospects. In: Lebel L et al (eds) Sustainable production consumption systems: knowledge, engagement and practice. Springer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Danielsen F, Beukema H, Burgess ND, Parish F, Brühl CA, Donald PF, Murdiyarso D, Phalan B, Reijnders L, Struebig M, Fitzherbert EB (2008) Biofuel plantations on forested lands: double jeopardy for biodiversity and climate. Conserv Biol 23(2):348–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fargione J, Hill J, Tilman D, Polasky S, Hawthorne P (2008) Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 319:1235–1238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Guinée JB, Gorrée M, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Kleijn R, de Koning A, van Oers L, Sleeswijk AW, Suh S, Udo de Haes HA, de Bruijn H, van Duin R, Huijbregts MAJ (2002) Life cycle assessment: an operational guide to the ISO standards. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  6. Gheewala SH (2011) Life cycle assessment (LCA) to evaluate environmental impacts of bioenergy projects. J Sustain Energy Environ 2(1):35–38Google Scholar
  7. IPCC (2006) 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas inventories Vol. 4-Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU), Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), HayamaGoogle Scholar
  8. Nguyen TLT, Gheewala SH (2008a) Life cycle assessment of fuel ethanol from cassava in Thailand. Int J LCA 13(2):147–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Nguyen TLT, Gheewala SH (2008b) Life cycle assessment of fuel ethanol from cane molasses in Thailand. Int J LCA 13(4):301–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nguyen TLT, Gheewala SH, Garivait S (2007) Full chain energy analysis of fuel ethanol from cassava in Thailand. Environ Sci Technol 41(11):4135–4142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Prueksakorn K, Gheewala SH (2008) Full chain energy analysis of biodiesel from Jatropha curcas L. Thailand. Environ Sci Technol 42(9):3388–3393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. ERIA (2008) Sustainable biomass utilisation vision in East Asia. ERIA Research Project Report 2007, No. 6-3, ERIA, JakartaGoogle Scholar
  13. Shapouri H, Wang M, Duffield JA (2006) Net energy balancing and fuel-cycle analysis. In: Dewulf J, van Langenhove H (eds) Renewables-based technology: sustainability assessment, Wiley, West SussexGoogle Scholar
  14. Silalertruksa T, Gheewala SH (2009) Environmental sustainability assessment of bio-ethanol production in Thailand. Energy 34(11):1933–1946CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Joint Graduate School of Energy and EnvironmentKing Mongkut’s University of Technology ThonburiBangkokThailand
  2. 2.Center for Energy Technology and EnvironmentMinistry of EducationBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations