Advertisement

Lean-Six Sigma Approach put into Practice in an Empirical Study

  • Martínez S. Miguélez
  • A. Errasti
  • J. A. Alberto
Conference paper

Abstract

Manufacturing process improvement using Lean principles, tools and techniques has been highlighted as one of the most effective approaches since its main goal is to eliminate waste and inefficiencies by creating more value with fewer resources. This approach has been extended worldwide, especially in the manufacturing sector. Nevertheless, to deepen the development of advanced stages of Lean, such as pull and demand-oriented production, it is necessary to reduce variability in processes. For this purpose, the integration of Six Sigma- DMAIC could be a useful approach in order to develop advanced lean stages. This paper presents the Six Sigma and Lean effectiveness integration via an action research case study carried out in a domestic appliance manufacturing facility.

Keywords

Six sigma DMAIC Lean Variability Case study 

References

  1. Antony J, Bañuelas R, Kumar A (2006) World class applications of six sigma: real world examples of success. Butterworth-Heinemann, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Avison D, Baskerville R, Myers M (2001) Controlling action research projects. Inf Technol People 14(1):28–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Eguren JA, Goti A, Pozueta L (2011) Diseño, aplicación y evaluación de un modelo de Me-jora Continua, DYNA Ingenieria e IndustriaGoogle Scholar
  4. Harry M, Schoroeder R (2000) Six sigma: the breakthrough management strategy revolutionizing the world’s top corporations. Doubleday & Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Hutchins D (2000) The power of six sigma in practice. Qual Focus 4(2):26–33Google Scholar
  6. Japan Management Association (1985) Kanban: just-in-time at Toyota. Productivity Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  7. Lynn Northrup C (2004) Dynamics of profit-focused accounting. Attaining sustained value and bottom-line improvement, J. Ross Publishing, USAGoogle Scholar
  8. Mena C, Whicker L, Templar S, Bernon M (2002) Costing the supply chain. Manufact Eng 81(5):225–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Monden Y (1993) Toyota production system: an integrated approach to just-in-time, 2nd edn. Industrial Engineering and Management Press, Norcross, GACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ohno T (1988) Toyota production system: beyond large-scale production. Productivity Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Pavnaskar SJ, Gershenson JK, Jambekar AB (2003) Classification scheme for Lean manufacturing tools. Int J Prod Res 41(13):3075–3090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Prybutok VR, Ramasesh R (2005) An action-research based instrument for monitoring continuous quality improvement. Eur J Oper Res 166(2):293–309MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Rother M, Shook J (2003) Learning to see: Value-stream mapping to create value and eliminate muda. The Lean Enterprise InstituteGoogle Scholar
  14. Schein EH (2008) Clinical inquiry/research. In: Reason P, Bradbury H (eds) The sage handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 266–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Shewhart WA (1931) Economic control of quality of manufactured product. D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Tang LC, Goh TN, Lam SW, Zhang CW (2007) Fortification of six sigma: expanding the DMAIC toolset. Qual Reliab Eng Int 23(1):3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Womack J, Jones D (1994) From lean production to the lean enterprise. Harvard Bus Rev 72(2):93–103Google Scholar
  18. Womack J, Jones D (1996) Beyond Toyota: how to root out waste and pursue perfection. Harvard Bus Rev 74:140–172Google Scholar
  19. Womack J, Jones D (2005) Lean thinking, Free pressGoogle Scholar
  20. Womack JP, Womack J, Jones DT (2002) Seeing the whole. Mapping the extended value stream. The Lean Enterprise Institute, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  21. Yin RK (2003) Case study research design and methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martínez S. Miguélez
    • 1
  • A. Errasti
    • 1
  • J. A. Alberto
    • 1
  1. 1.Tecnun, Engineering School at University of NavarraSan SebastiánSpain

Personalised recommendations