Advertisement

Light-Emitting Diode Phototherapy

  • R. Glen CalderheadEmail author
  • Tokuya Omi
Chapter

Abstract

  • Phototherapy is the process of using light as a therapeutic modality. In contrast to photosurgery, phototherapy induces its effect without producing significant heat damage to the target tissue.

  • The light-emitting diode (LED) is a solid state semiconductor chip which emits light when an electric current is applied to it, and LED-based systems represent one type of phototherapy source that has a variety of clinical applications.

  • Laser energy entered the arena in 1960 with Maiman’s ruby laser, and attenuated laser beams were used for phototherapeutic purposes as low level laser therapy (LLLT) in the late 1960s, pioneered by the late Endre Mester and colleagues.

  • Light-emitting diodes (LEDs) were then tried as a phototherapeutic source, but were mostly inefficient due to their wide divergence, limited and unstable output powers and a wide waveband which limited target specificity.

  • The advent of the “NASA LED” in 1998 changed this, when Whelan and colleagues developed an LED that was many orders of magnitude more powerful than existing LEDs with a stable output power, and, most importantly, a quasimonochromatic beam. They thus offered an excellent new phototherapy source with biological target-specific wavelengths. The acronym ‘LLLT’ is thus still used, but with the readily available clinically useful LEDs being widely reported in a large variety of indications, LLLT now stands for low level LIGHT therapy so that LED phototherapy is part of the LLLT family.

  • A large body of low level laser therapy literature exists where the systems were either laser diode (LD)-based systems at specific wavelengths or the 633 nm helium:neon (He:Ne) laser. Taking these previously reported data into consideration, phototherapeutic LED-based systems were built based on the same effective wavelengths, but incorporating the inherent advantages of LEDs: namely a very efficient light source; able to be mounted in large planar arrays to treat large areas of the body in a hands-free manner; and comparatively inexpensive compared even with LDs thereby helping to minimize cost to the clinician and patient.

  • LED phototherapy has now been well-reported in many clinical fields where it is used to:
    • accelerate and enhance wound healing in acute and chronic wounds of all etiologies

    • control inflammation and erythema

    • speed up the healing of bone damage, even for slow union fractures

    • attenuate and control acute and chronic pain of all types

    • improve results of any aspect of aesthetic and cosmetic surgery

    • rejuvenate photodamaged skin

    • provide prophylaxis against hypertrophic scar formation

    • attenuate hyperactive melanocytes in acquired-type pigmentary disorders

    • treat circulatory disorders such as Raynaud’s disease, vasculogenic ulcers and diabetic foot

  • This chapter will focus on the photobiological basics behind LED phototherapy and examine the mechanisms which have currently been elucidated, as well as providing some basic studies underlying the success of LED phototherapy in many fields. The potential user, however, should carefully ascertain the specific qualities of any LED system in regard to the true wavelength, active irradiated area and certified irradiance or power density. Furthermore, the user must match the wavelength with the desired target to ensure efficient absorption, because, as the first law of photobiology points out, without absorption there can be no reaction.

  • In conclusion, LED phototherapy at appropriate wavelengths is safe and effective, easy to apply, pain- and side effect-free and well tolerated by patients of all ages.

Keywords

Quasimonochromaticity Photobioactivation Mitochondria Cytochrome-c oxidase Systemic effect Wound healing 

References

  1. 1.
    Giese AC. Living with our sun’s ultraviolet rays. New York: Springer; 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Krzyścin JW, Jarosławski J, Rajewska-Więch B, Sobolewski PS, Narbutt J, Lesiak A, et al. Effectiveness of heliotherapy for psoriasis clearance in low and mid-latitudinal regions: a theoretical approach. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2012;115:35–41. Epub 2012 Jun 28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grzybowski A, Pietrzak K. From patient to discoverer–Niels Ryberg Finsen (1860–1904) –the founder of phototherapy in dermatology. Clin Dermatol. 2012;4:451–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ohshiro T, Calderhead RG. Low level laser therapy: a practical introduction. Chichester: Wiley; 1988.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Whelan HT, Houle JM, Whelan NT, Donohoe DL, Cwiklinsky J, Schmidt MH, et al. The NASA light-emitting diode medical program- progress in space flight and terrestrial applications. Space Technol App Int’l Forum. 2000;504:37–43.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Whelan HT, Smits Jr RL, Buchman EV, Whelan NT, Turner SG, Margolis DA, et al. Effect of NASA light-emitting diode (LED) irradiation on wound healing. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 2001;19:305–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Karu T. Primary and secondary mechanisms of action of visible to near-IR radiation on cells. J Photochem Photobiol B. 1999;49:1–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Smith KC. The science of photobiology. New York: Plenum Press; 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Karu T. Identification of the photoreceptors. In: Ten lectures on basic science of laser phototherapy. Grangesberg: Prima Books AB; 2007.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lubart R, Friedmann H, Levinshal T, Lavie R, Breitbart HJ. Effect of light on calcium transport in bull sperm cells. J Photochem Photobiol B. 1992;15:337–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee SY, You CE, Park MY. Blue and red light combination LED phototherapy for acne vulgaris in patients with skin phototype IV. Lasers Surg Med. 2007;39:180–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Calderhead RG. Light-emitting diode phototherapy in dermatological practice. In: Nouri K, editor. Lasers in dermatology and medicine. London: Springer; 2011. p. 231–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Takezaki S, Omi T, Sato S, Kawana S. Ultrastructural observations of human skin following irradiation with visible red light-emitting diodes (LEDs): a preliminary in vivo report. Laser Ther. 2005;14:153–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sato S, Sasaki Y, Adachi A, Dai W, Liu XL, Namimatsu S. Use of oolong tea extract (OTE) for elastin staining and enhancement in ultrathin specimens. Med Electron Microsc. 2003;36:179–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee SY, Park KH, Choi JW, Kwon JK, Lee DR, Shin MS, et al. A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, and split-face clinical study on LED phototherapy for skin rejuvenation: clinical, profilometric, histologic, ultrastructural, and biochemical evaluations and comparison of three different treatment settings. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2007;88:51–67. Epub 2007 May 1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Calderhead RG, Kubota J, Trelles MA, Ohshiro T. One mechanism behind LED phototherapy for wound healing and skin rejuvenation: key role of the mast cell. Laser Ther. 2008;17:141–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Young S, Bolton P, Dyson M, Harvey W, Diamantopoulos C. Macrophage responsiveness to light therapy. Lasers Surg Med. 1989;9:497–505.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bolton P, Dyson M, Young S. The effect of polarized light on the release of growth factors from the U-973 macrophage-like cell line. Laser Ther. 1992;4:33–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Osanai T, Shiroto C, Mikami Y, Kudou E, et al. Measurement of GaAlAs diode laser action on phagocytic activity of human neutrophils as a possible therapeutic dosimetry determinant. Laser Ther. 1990;2:123–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Morgan MC, Rashid RM. The effect of phototherapy on neutrophils. Int Immunopharmacol. 2009;9:383–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mester AF, Mester A. Wound-healing. Laser Ther. 1989;1:7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee GY, Kim WS. The systemic effect of 830-nm LED phototherapy on the wound healing of burn injuries: a controlled study in mouse and rat models. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2012;14:107–10. Epub 2012 Feb 28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kim WS, Calderhead RG. Is light-emitting diode low level light therapy (LED-LLLT) really effective? Laser Ther. 2011;20:205–15.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.VP, Medicoscientific AffairsClinical Research Facility, Clinique LGoyang City, Goyang-shiSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of DermatologyQueen’s Square Medical CenterYokohamaJapan

Personalised recommendations