Charting a Course for Computer-Aided Bio-Inspired Design

  • Robert B. Stone
  • Ashok K. Goel
  • Daniel A. McAdams
Chapter

Abstract

Bio-inspired design (BID) is an emerging research area in design, biology, computing, and engineering that seeks to systematically mine biological knowledge to solve design problems. To promote BID research, and especially research on computer-aided BID, the United States National Science Foundation (NSF) recently sponsored two workshops. These workshops served as the catalysis for this book. In this chapter, we review the discussions at the two workshops. We also sketch the outline of a research program on computer-aided BID that emerged from the workshops.

Keywords

Biomimicry Biologically inspired design Computer-aided design Engineering design Design computing 

Suggested Readings

Bio-Inspiration

  1. Arciszewski T, Cornell J (2006) Bioinspiration: learning creative design principles. In intelligent computing in engineering and architecture. Lect Notes Comput Sci 4200:32–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bar-Cohen Y (2006) (ed) Biomimetics–using nature to inspire human innovation. Bioinspir Biomim 1(1):P1–P12. doi: 10.1088/1748-3182/1/1/P01 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bar-Cohen Y (2011) (ed) Biomimetics: nature-based Innovation. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  4. Benyus JM (1997) Biomimicry: innovation inspired by nature, 1st edn. Morrow, NewYorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonser R, Vincent J (2007) Technology trajectories, innovation, and the growth of biomimetics. In: Proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers, part C: journal of mechanical engineering science, pp 1177–1180Google Scholar
  6. Chakrabarti A, Shu L (2010) Biologically inspired design. AIEDAM 24:453–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Helms M, Vattam S, Goel A (2009) Biologically inspired design: process and products. Des Stud 30(5):606–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lindemann U, Gramann J (2004) Engineering design using biological principles. Proc Int Des Conf Des 5:18–21 (Dubrovnik)Google Scholar
  9. Mak T, Shu L (2008) Using descriptions of biological phenomena for idea generation. Res Eng Des 19:21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Shu, L, Ueda K, Chiu I, Cheong H (2011) Biologically inspired design. CIRP Ann Manuf TechnolGoogle Scholar
  11. Vincent JFV (2005) Deconstructing the design of a biological material. J Theor Biol 236:73–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Vincent J, Mann D (2002) Systematic technology transfer from biology to engineering, philosophical transactions of the royal society. Physical Sci 360:159–173Google Scholar
  13. Wilson J, Rosen D, Nelson B, Yen J (2010) The effects of biological examples in idea generation. Des Stud 31(2):169–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Yen J, Weissburg M (2007) Perspectives on biologically inspired design: introduction to the collected contributions. J Bioinspiration Biomimetics 2Google Scholar

Bridging Biology and Engineering

  1. Fish FE (1998) Imaginative solutions by marine organisms for drag reduction. In: Meng JCS (ed) Proceedings of the international symposium on seawater drag reduction. Newport, Rhode Island, pp 443–450Google Scholar
  2. Fish FE (2006) Limits of nature and advances of technology in marine systems: What does biomimetics have to offer to aquatic robots? Appl Bionics Biomech 3:49–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. French M (1994) Invention and evolution: design in nature and engineering, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988Google Scholar
  4. Nagel JKS, Stone RB, McAdams DA (2010) An engineering-to-biology thesaurus for engineering design. In: ASME IDETC/CIE 2010 DTM-28233, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2010Google Scholar
  5. Vattam S, Goel A (2011) Foraging for inspiration: understanding and supporting the information seeking practices of biologically inspired designers. In Proceedings of ASME DETC conference on design theory and methods, Washington DC, August 2011Google Scholar
  6. Vogel S (1988) Life’s devices. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  7. Vogel S (1994) Life in moving fluids. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar

Techniques and Tools for Bio-Inspired Conceptual Design

  1. Chakrabarti A, Sarkar P, Leelavathamma B, Nataraju B (2005) A functional representation for aiding biomimetic and artificial inspiration of new ideas. AIEDAM 19(2):113–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cheong H, Chiu I, Shu LH, Stone RB, McAdams DA (2011) Biologically meaningful keywords for terms of the functional basis. J Mech Des 132(2):02001-7–02001-11Google Scholar
  3. Chiu I, Shu L (2007a) Biomimetic design through natural language analysis to facilitate cross-domain information retrieval. AIEDAM 21:45–59Google Scholar
  4. Chiu I, Shu L (2007b) Using language as related stimuli for concept generation. AIEDAM 21:103–121Google Scholar
  5. Goel A, Vattam S, Wiltgen B, Helms M (2012) Cognitive, collaborative, conceptual and creative—four characteristics of the next generation of knowledge-based CAD systems: a study in biologically inspired design. Comput Aided Des 44(10):879–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lenau T (2009) Biomimetics as a design methodology—possibilities and challenges, international conference on engineering design, ICED’09 24–27 August 2009. Stanford University, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Nagel JKS, Stone RB (2012) A computational approach to biologically-inspired design. AIEDAM 26(2)Google Scholar
  8. Nagel RL, Midha PA, Tinsley A, McAdams DA, Stone RB, and Shu LH Exploring the use of functional models in biomimetic conceptual design. J Mech Des 130(12):121102-1–121102-13Google Scholar
  9. Sarkar P, Chakrabarti A (2008) The effect of representation of triggers on design outcomes. Artif Intell Des Anal Manuf 22(02):101–116Google Scholar
  10. Sartori J, Pal U, Chakrabarti A (2010) A methodology for supporting “transfer” in biomimetic design. AIEDAM 24:483–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Shu L (2010) A natural-language approach to biomimetic design. AIEDAM 24:507–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Srinivasan V, Chakrabarti A (2010) An integrated model of designing. ASME JCISE 10(3)Google Scholar
  13. Vattam S, Helms M, Goel A (2008) Compound analogical design: interaction between problem decomposition and analogical transfer in biologically inspired design. In Proceedings of third international conference on design computing and cognition, Atlanta, June 2008. Springer, Berlin, pp 377–396Google Scholar

Education in Bio-Inspired Design

  1. Bruck H, Gershon A, Golden I, Gupta S, Gyger L, Magrab E, Spranklin B (2007) Training mechanical engineering students to utilize biological inspiration during product development. Bioinspiration and Biomimetics 2:S198–S209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Glier MW, Tsenn J, Linsey JS, McAdams DA (2011a) Methods for supporting bioinspired design. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2011 international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, number IMECE2011-63247, Denver, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  3. Glier MW, Tsenn J, Linsey JS, McAdams DA (2011b) Concepts in biomimetic design: methods and tools to incorporate into a biomimetic design course. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2011 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, number DETC2011-48571, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  4. Helms M, Vattam S, Goel K (2010) The effect of functional modeling on understanding biological systems. In: Proceedings of ASME 2010 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference (IDETC/CIE 2010). August 15–18, 2010, Montreal, Quebec, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  5. Nelson B, Wilson J, Yen J (2009) A study of biologically-inspired design as a context for enhancing student innovation. In: Proceedings of 39th ASEE/IEEE frontiers in education conference, 2009Google Scholar
  6. Vakili V, Chiu I, Shu LH, McAdams DA, Stone RB (2007) Including functional models of biological phenomena as design stimuli. In: Proceedings of the 2007 ASME design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, number DETC2007-35776, Las Vegas, NevadaGoogle Scholar
  7. Weissburg M, Tovey C, Yen J (2010) Enhancing innovation through biologically inspired design. Adv Nat Sci 3:145–167Google Scholar
  8. Yen J, Weissburg M, Helms M, Goel A (2011) Biologically inspired design: a tool for interdisciplinary education. In: Bar-Cohen Y (ed) Biomimetics: nature-based innovation, Taylor & FrancisGoogle Scholar
  9. Yen J, Helms M, Goel A, Vattam S (2010) Evaluating biological systems for their potential in engineering design. Adv Nat Sci 3(2)Google Scholar

Design Theory for Bio-Inspired Design

  1. Goel A, Bras B, Helms M, Rugaber S, Tovey C Vattam S, Weissburg M, Wiltgen B, Yen J (2011) Design patterns and cross-domain analogies in biologically inspired sustainable design. In: Proceedings of AAAI spring Symposium on AI and sustainable design, Stanford University, Palo Alto, March 2011, pp 45–51Google Scholar
  2. Goel A, Vattam S, Wiltgen B, Helms M (2011b) An information-processing account of creative analogies in biologically inspired design. In: Proceedings of eighth ACM conference on creativity and cognition, Atlanta, Nov 2011, pp 71–80Google Scholar
  3. Helms M, Goel A (2012) Analogical problem evolution in biologically inspired design. In: Proceedings of fifth international conference on design computing and cognition, College Station, Texas, July 2012, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  4. Nagel JKS, Nagel RL, Stone RB, McAdams DA (2010) Function-based biologically-inspired concept generation. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf 24(4):521–553Google Scholar
  5. Vattam S, Helms M, Goel A (2010) A content account of creative analogies in biologically inspired design. AI Eng Des Anal Manuf Spec Issue Biol Inspired Des 24:467–481Google Scholar
  6. Vincent J, Bogatyreva O, Bogatyrev N, Bowyer A, Pahl A (2006) Biomimetics: its practice and theory. J R Soc Interface 3:471–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert B. Stone
    • 1
  • Ashok K. Goel
    • 2
  • Daniel A. McAdams
    • 3
  1. 1.School of MechanicalIndustrial, Oregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  2. 2.School of Interactive ComputingGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations