Skip to main content

Rapid Prototyping Environment for Control Systems Implementation

  • Chapter
Case Studies in Control

Part of the book series: Advances in Industrial Control ((AIC))

Abstract

In this chapter an easy-to-use SW tool is presented that enables rapid prototyping of advanced (and classical) control methods in an industrial environment. In this way various solutions can be quickly verified before making a final decision regarding the selection of a particular solution and its implementation. The tool supports simple process modelling based on recorded plant data, enables the selection of the most appropriate control method on the spot (the present version includes PID control, feed-forward compensation, predictive control, and TITO (two inputs, two outputs) control, and facilitates the implementation, testing and evaluation of the prototype controller. The tool is adapted to various protocols of control signal acquisition (data files of SCADA systems, Matlab, etc.) and enables direct control by connection to the process through OPC communication, one of the most widely used communication protocols in process industries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The external controller is a PID controller which actually controls the process. It is either a stand-alone controller or running within the PLC.

References

  1. Bestune (2011) PID controller auto-tuning software. http://bestune.50megs.com

  2. Bucher R, Balemi S (2006) Rapid controller prototyping with MATLAB&Simulink and Linux. Control Eng Pract 14:185–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Butts K, Varga A (2011) Tools and platforms for control systems. In: Samad T, Annaswamy A (eds) The impact of control technology. IEEE Control Systems Society, New York, pp 89–93

    Google Scholar 

  4. Control Station, Inc. (2012) Loop-pro product suite. http://www.controlstation.com/page/53-pid-controller-tuning

    Google Scholar 

  5. dSPACE (2012) Test and experiment software. http://www.dspace.com/en/ltd/home/products/sw/expsoft.cfm

    Google Scholar 

  6. ExperTune (2011) PIDLOOP optimizer. http://www.expertune.com/standard.html

    Google Scholar 

  7. Garnier H, Wang L (2008) Identification of continuous-time models from sampled data. Springer, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Gerkšič S, Strmčnik S, Van den Boom TJJ (2008) Feedback action in predictive control: an experimental case study. Control Eng Pract 16:321–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gonzalez-Martin R, Lopez I, Morilla F, Pastor R (2003) Sintolab: the REPSOL-YPF PID tuning tool. Control Eng Pract 11:1469–1480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hercog D, Jezernik K (2005) Rapid control prototyping using MATLAB/Simulink and a DSP-based motor controller. Int J Eng 21(4):596–605

    Google Scholar 

  11. Intune (2011) Loop tuning, performance monitoring & diagnostic software. http://www.controlsoftinc.com/intune5.shtml

    Google Scholar 

  12. IPCOS NV (2012) INCA PID tuner. http://www.ipcos.com/en/inca_pid_tuner

    Google Scholar 

  13. Isermann R (2008) Mechatronic systems—innovative products with embedded control. Control Eng Pract 16:14–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Juričić Ð, Dolanc G, Rakar A (1997) Semi-physical modelling of a FDI benchmark process. In: Troch I, Breitenecker F (eds) Proceedings ARGESIM 1997, Vienna, Austria, pp 815–820

    Google Scholar 

  15. Klán P, Gorez R (2000) Balanced tuning of PI controllers. Eur J Control 6(6):541–550

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mathworks (2011) MATLAB OPC toolbox. http://www.mathworks.com/products/opc

    Google Scholar 

  17. MATLAB Control Systems Toolbox (2012) Function “pidtool”. http://www.mathworks.com/help/toolbox/control/ref/pidtool.html

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pannocchia G, Laachi N, Rawlings JB (2006) A candidate to replace PID control: siso-constrained LQ control. AIChE J 51:1178–1189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Qin SJ, Badgwell TA (2003) A survey of industrial model predictive control technology. Control Eng Pract 11(7):733–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Stewart G, Samad T (2011) Cross-application perspectives: application and market requirements. In: Samad T, Annaswamy A (eds) The impact of control technology. IEEE Control Systems Society, New York, pp 95–100

    Google Scholar 

  21. U-Tune PID Tuning Package. http://www.contek-systems.co.uk/UTune.htm

  22. Vrančić D (2012) LEK tuner. Jožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana. http://dsc.ijs.si/lektuner/

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vrančić D, Ganchev I, Lieslehto J (2002) Tuning multivariable controllers by using magnitude optimum approach. In: Proceedings of 2002 Asian control conference (ASCC’02), Singapore, pp 2163–2167

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vrančić D, Huba M (2007) LEK tuner—program package for tuning PID controllers. In: Proceedings of the 2007 process control conference, Štrbské Pleso, Slovakia, pp 225-1–225-5

    Google Scholar 

  25. Vrančić D, Kocijan J, Strmčnik S (2004) Simplified disturbance rejection tuning method for PID controllers. In: Proceedings of the 2004 Asian control conference (ASCC’04), Melbourne, Australia, pp 491–496

    Google Scholar 

  26. Vrančić D, Lieslehto J, Strmčnik S (2001) Designing a MIMO PI controller using the multiple integration approach. Process Control Qual 11(6):455–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Vrančić D, Strmčnik S, Juričić Ð(2001) A magnitude optimum multiple integration tuning method for filtered PID controller. Automatica 37:1473–1479

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Vrančić D, Strmčnik S, Kocijan J (2004) Improving disturbance rejection of PI controllers by means of the magnitude optimum method. ISA Trans 43:73–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Vrečko D, Vrančić D, Juričić Ð, Strmčnik S (2001) A new modified Smith predictor: the concept, design and tuning. ISA Trans 40:111–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank to LEK, d.d., the Slovenian Research Agency under grant P2-0001, and the Ministry of Education, Science, Culture and Sport of the Republic of Slovenia for their financial support. The financial support of the European Regional Development Fund in the framework of the Centre of Excellence for Advanced Control Technologies and the Competence Centre for Advanced Control Technologies of the European Union is also gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vrančić, D. (2013). Rapid Prototyping Environment for Control Systems Implementation. In: Strmčnik, S., Juričić, Đ. (eds) Case Studies in Control. Advances in Industrial Control. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5176-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5176-0_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5175-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5176-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics