Sensor Network Applications

  • K. Erciyes
Part of the Computer Communications and Networks book series (CCN)

Abstract

Localization is the method of providing the coordinates of sensors in 2-D plane so that these coordinates may be attributed to the sensed data to make it more meaningful and also network protocols such as routing may use this information. An important application of sensor networks is the tracking of mobile objects in the area of deployment to determine their trajectory. In this chapter, we first investigate methods to solve the localization problem and then describe few algorithms to track objects efficiently in sensor networks where distributed graph algorithms such as clustering and tree construction can be used for real-life applications.

Keywords

Hull Coord 

References

  1. 1.
    Alaybeyoglu A, Erciyes K, Dagdeviren O, Kantarci A (2010) A dynamic distributed algorithm for tracking fast moving targets in wireless sensor networks. IETE Tech Rev 27(1):46–53 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alaybeyoglu A, Erciyes K, Kantarci A (2013) An adaptive cone based distributed tracking algorithm for a highly dynamic target in wireless sensor networks. Int J Ad Hoc Ubiq Comput 12(5):98–119 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bachrach J, Taylor C (2005) Localization in sensor networks. In: Stojmenovic I (ed) Handbook of sensor networks: algorithms and architectures. Wiley, New York, Chapter 9 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bulusu N, Heidemann J, Estrin D (2000) GPS-less low cost outdoor localization for very small devices. IEEE Pers Commun 7:28–34 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen WP, Hou J, Sha L (2003) Dynamic clustering for acoustic target tracking in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 3(3):258–271 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Doucet A, de Freitas N, Gordon N (eds) (2001) Sequential Monte Carlo methods in practice. Statistics for engineering and information science. Springer, New York MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gelb A (1974) Applied optimal estimation. MIT Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grewal MS, Andrews P (1993) Kalman filtering: theory and practice. Prentice Hall, New York MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gui C, Mohapatra P (2004) Power conservation and quality of surveillance in target tracking sensor networks. In: Proc 10th annual international conference on mobile computing and networking, MobiCom ’04, pp 129–143 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gupta R, Das SR (2003) Tracking moving targets in a smart sensor network. In: Vehicular technology conference, IEEE VTC 2003, vol 5, pp 3035–3039 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim SY, Kwon OH (2005) Location estimation based on edge weights in wireless sensor networks. J Korea Inform Commun Soc 30 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Niculescu D, Nath B (2001) Ad hoc positioning system (APS). In: Proc IEEE GLOBECOM 2001, pp 2926–2931 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Whitehouse K, Culler D (2003) Macro-calibration in sensor/actuator networks. Mob Netw Appl 8(4):463–472 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Xu Y, Winter J, Lee W-C (2004) Dual prediction-based reporting for object tracking sensor networks. In: Proc mobile and ubiquitous systems: networking and services, MOBIQUITOUS 2004, pp 154–163 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yingqi X, Lee W-C (2004) Prediction-based strategies for energy saving in object tracking sensor networks. In: Proc fifth IEEE international conference on mobile data management (MDM’04) Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang W, Cao G (2004) DCTC: dynamic convoy tree-based collaboration for target tracking in sensor networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 3(5):1689–1701 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhao F, Shin J, Reich J (2002) Information-driven dynamic sensor collaboration for tracking applications. IEEE Signal Process Mag 19(2):61–72 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Erciyes
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Engineering DepartmentIzmir UniversityUckuyular, IzmirTurkey

Personalised recommendations