Advertisement

Cognition: Mental Representations, Problem Solving, and Decision Making

  • Frank E. RitterEmail author
  • Gordon D. Baxter
  • Elizabeth F. Churchill
Chapter

Abstract

There are several higher level structures built upon the basic structures of memory, attention, and learning in the user’s cognitive architecture. These representations and behaviors include mental models, problem solving, and decision making. These structures and processes form the basics of higher level cognition when interacting with technology, and describe some of the ways that users represent systems and interfaces, and how users interact with and use systems. Mental models are used to understand systems and to interact with systems. When the user’s mental models are inaccurate, systems are hard to use. Problem solving is used when it is not clear what to do next. Problem solving uses mental models, forms a basis for learning, and can be supported in a variety of ways. Decision making is a more punctuated form of problem solving, made about and with systems. It is not always as clear or accurate as one would like (or expect), and there are ways to support and improve it. There are some surprises in each of these areas where folk psychology concepts and theories are inaccurate.

Keywords

Mental Model Functional Fixedness Confirmation Bias Confidence Judgment High Level Cognition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bibby, P. A., & Payne, S. J. (1996). Instruction and practice in learning to use a device. Cognitive Science, 20(4), 539–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Byrne, M. D., & Bovair, S. (1997). A working memory model of a common procedural error. Cognitive Science, 21(1), 31–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cacciabue, P. C., Decortis, F., Drozdowicz, B., Masson, M., & Nordvik, J. (1992). COSIMO: A cognitive simulation model of human decision making and behavior in accident management of complex plants. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 22(5), 1058–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carroll, J. M., & Olson, J. (Eds.). (1987). Mental models in human-computer interaction: Research issues about what the user of software knows. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  6. Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dawes, R. M. (1994). House of cards: Psychology and psychotherapy built on myth. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dunning, D., Heath, C., & Suls, J. M. (2004). Flawed self-assessment: Implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(3), 69–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dunning, D., Johnson, K., Ehrlinger, J., & Kruger, J. (2003). Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(3), 83–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Evans, J. St. B. T. (1990). Biases in human reasoning. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. Fogg, B. J. (2003). Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we think and do. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  12. Gentner, D., & Stevens, A. L. (Eds.). (1983). Mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  13. Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & the ABC Research Group (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Gobet, F., Richman, H., Staszewski, J., & Simon, H. A. (1997). Goals, representations, and strategies in a concept attainment task: The EPAM model. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 37, 265–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gobet, F., & Simon, H. A. (1996a). Templates in chess memory: A mechanism for recalling several boards. Cognitive Psychology, 31, 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gobet, F., & Simon, H. A. (1996b). The roles of recognition processes and look-ahead search in time-constrained expert problem solving: Evidence from grandmaster level chess. Psychological Science, 7, 52–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hayes, J. R. (1981). The complete problem solver. Philadelphia: The Franklin Institute Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hoffman, R. R., Crandall, B., & Shadbolt, N. R. (1998). Use of the critical decision method to elicit expert knowledge: A case study in the methodology of cognitive task analysis. Human Factors, 40, 254–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Johnson-Laird, P. N., Legrenzi, P., & Sonio Legrenzi, M. (1972). Reasoning and a sense of reality. British Journal of Psychology, 63, 395–400.Google Scholar
  21. Kahneman, D. (2013). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  22. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  23. Kaplan, C. (1989). Hatching a theory of incubation: Does putting a problem aside really help? If so, why?, Carnegie-Mellon University, University Microfilms International, Catalog #9238813.Google Scholar
  24. Klein, G. A. (1997). Recognition-primed decision making: Looking back, looking forward. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  25. Krug, S. (2005). Don’t make me think: A common sense approach to web usability (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: New Riders Press.Google Scholar
  26. Larkin, J. H., McDermott, J., Simon, D. P., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems. Science, 208, 1335–1342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lehto, M. R. (1997). Decision making. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (pp. 1201–1248). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  28. Levitt, S., & Dubner, S. J. (2005). Freakonomics: A rogue economist explores the hidden side of everything. New York, NY: William Morrow/HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  29. Luchins, A. S. (1942). Mechanization in problem solving: The effect of Einstellung. Psychological Monographs, 54(6), 1–95.Google Scholar
  30. Moray, N. (1996). A taxonomy and theory of mental models. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 40th Annual Meeting (Vol. 1, pp. 164–168).Google Scholar
  31. Moray, N. (1999). Mental models in theory and practice. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 223–258). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  32. Norman, D. A. (1983). Design rules based on analysis of human error. Communications of the ACM, 26(4), 254–258.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  33. Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  34. Norman, D. A. (2013). The design of everyday things. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  35. NTSB. (1990). Aircraft accident report. United Airlines flight 232. Mc Donnell Douglas DC-10-10. Sioux Gateway airport. Sioux City, Iowa, July 19, 1989. Washington DC: National Transportation Safety Board.Google Scholar
  36. Payne, S. J. (1995). Naive judgments of stimulus-response compatibility. Human Factors, 37, 495–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Quinlan, P., & Dyson, B. (2008). Cognitive psychology. Harlow, UK: Pearson.Google Scholar
  38. Rasmussen, J. (1983). Skills, rules, knowledge: Signals, signs and symbols and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Transactions: Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-13, 257–267.Google Scholar
  39. Revell, K. M. A., & Stanton, N. A. (2012). Models of models: Filtering and bias rings in depiction of knowledge structures and their implications for design. Ergonomics, 55(9), 1073–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ries, A., & Trout, J. (1986/2000). Positioning: The battle for your mind. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill International.Google Scholar
  41. Ritter, F. E., & Bibby, P. A. (2008). Modeling how, when, and what learning happens in a diagrammatic reasoning task. Cognitive Science, 32, 862–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ritter, F. E., Jones, R. M., & Baxter, G. D. (1998). Reusable models and graphical interfaces: Realising the potential of a unified theory of cognition. In U. Schmid, J. Krems, & F. Wysotzki (Eds.), Mind modeling—a cognitive science approach to reasoning, learning and discovery (pp. 83–109). Lengerich, Germany: Pabst Scientific Publishing.Google Scholar
  43. Schwartz, B. (2004). The paradox of choice: Why more is less. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  44. Simon, H. A. (1997). Administrative behavior (4th ed.). New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  45. Simon, H. A., & Chase, W. G. (1973). Skill in chess. American Scientist, 61, 393–403.Google Scholar
  46. Smallman, H. S., & St. John, M. (2005). Naïve realism: Misplaced faith in the utility of realistic displays. Ergonomics in Design, 13(Summer), 6–13.Google Scholar
  47. Sternberg, R. J. (2004). Why smart people can be so foolish. European Psychologist, 9(3), 145–150.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  48. Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (1995). The nature of insight. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  49. Tverksy, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  50. Tverksy, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, 59, 251–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wilson, J. R., & Rutherford, A. (1989). Mental models: Theory and application in human factors. Human Factors, 31, 617–634.Google Scholar
  53. Winne, P. H., & Jamieson-Noel, D. (2002). Exploring students’ calibration of self reports about study tactics and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(4), 551–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank E. Ritter
    • 1
    Email author
  • Gordon D. Baxter
    • 2
  • Elizabeth F. Churchill
    • 3
  1. 1.College of ISTThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  2. 2.School of Computer ScienceUniversity of St AndrewsSt AndrewsUK
  3. 3.eBay Research LabsSan JoseUSA

Personalised recommendations