Abstract
If designers and developers want to design better technologies that are intended for human use they need to have a good understanding of the people who are or who will be using their systems. Understanding people, their characteristics, capabilities, commonalities, and differences allows designers to create more effective, safer, efficient, and enjoyable systems. This book provides readers with resources for thinking about people—commonly called “users”—their tasks and the context in which they perform those tasks. Our intention is to enable you to make more informed decisions when designing complex interactive systems. This chapter thus introduces this argument through example design problems. We then present the benefits and costs associated with understanding the user. Two approaches for understanding users are introduced. The first is a framework called the ABCS for understanding, in broad strokes, different aspects of users. The second is user knowledge and action simulation for developing and testing how users approach tasks in more detail. After reading this chapter you should be able to appreciate why it is important to understand users, and the associated benefits and costs of doing so.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Also published sometimes as The psychology of everyday things.
- 3.
A millisecond is a thousandth of a second, and is abbreviated ms.
References
Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M. D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C., & Qin, Y. (2004). An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1036–1060.
Baxter, G. D., Monk, A. F., Tan, K., Dear, P. R. F., & Newell, S. J. (2005). Using cognitive task analysis to facilitate the integration of decision support systems into the neonatal intensive care unit. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 35, 243–257.
Boff, K. R., & Lincoln, J. E. (Eds.). (1988). Engineering data compendium (User’s guide). Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH: Harry G. Armstrong Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory.
Booher, H. R., & Minninger, J. (2003). Human systems integration in army systems acquisition. In H. R. Booher (Ed.), Handbook of human systems integration (pp. 663–698). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
Brown, C. M. L. (1988). Human-computer interface design guidelines. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Bruce, V., Gilmore, D., Mason, L., & Mayhew, P. (1983). Factors affecting the perceived value of coins. Journal of Economic Psychology, 4(4), 335–347.
Byrne, M. D. (2001). ACT-R/PM and menu selection: Applying a cognitive architecture to HCI. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 55(1), 41–84.
Casper, J., & Murphy, R. (2003). Human-robot interactions during the robot-assisted urban search and rescue response at the World Trade Center. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part B, 33(3), 367–385.
Chapanis, A., & Lindenbaum, L. E. (1959). A reaction time study of four control-display linkages. Human Factors, 1(4), 1–7.
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fitts, P. M. (1951). Engineering psychology and equipment design. In S. S. Stevens (Ed.), Handbook of experimental psychology (pp. 1287–1340). New York, NY: John Wiley.
Flowers, S. (1997). Software failure: Management failure… Amazing stories and cautionary tales. New York, NY: Wiley.
Freed, M., & Remington, R. (2000). Making human-machine system simulation a practical engineering tool: An APEX overview. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Cognitive Modelling (pp. 110–117). Veenendaal, The Netherlands: Universal Press.
Gigerenzer, G. (2004). Dread risk, september 11, and fatal traffic accidents. Psychological Science, 15(4), 286–287.
Glushko, R. J., & Tabas, L. (2009). Designing service systems by bridging the “front stage” and “back stage”. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 7(4), 407–427.
Gray, W. D., John, B. E., & Atwood, M. E. (1992). The precis of project Ernestine or an overview of a validation of GOMS. In Proceedings of the CHI‘92 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems. New York, NY: ACM Press.
Gray, W. D., John, B. E., & Atwood, M. E. (1993). Project Ernestine: Validating a GOMS analysis for predicting and explaining real-world task performance. Human-Computer Interaction, 8(3), 237–309.
Helander, M. G., & Tham, M. P. (2003). Hedonomics: Affective human factors design. Ergonomics, 46(13/14), 1269–1272.
Holmes, N. (2005). The Internet, the Web, and the Chaos. IEEE Computer, 38(108), 106–107.
Johnson, E. J., Bellman, S., & Lohse, G. L. (2003). Cognitive lock-in and the power law of practice. Journal of Marketing, 67, 62–75.
Jones, G., Ritter, F. E., & Wood, D. J. (2000). Using a cognitive architecture to examine what develops. Psychological Science, 11(2), 93–100.
Jones, R. M., Laird, J. E., Nielsen, P. E., Coulter, K. J., Kenny, P., & Koss, F. V. (1999). Automated intelligent pilots for combat flight simulation. AI Magazine, 20(1), 27–41.
Jordan, P. W. (2000). Designing pleasurable products. London: Taylor & Francis.
Kieras, D. E., Wood, S. D., & Meyer, D. E. (1997). Predictive engineering models based on the EPIC architecture for a multimodal high-performance human-computer interaction task. Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 4(3), 230–275.
Kosslyn, S. M. (2007). Clear and to the point: 8 psychological principles for creating compelling Powerpoint presentations. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Laird, J. E., & van Lent, M. (2001). Human-level AI’s killer application: Interactive computer games. AI Magazine, 22(2), 15–26.
Leveson, N. G., & Turner, C. S. (1993). An investigation of the Therac-25 accidents. IEEE Computer, 26(7), 18–41.
Lovett, M. C., Daily, L. Z., & Reder, L. M. (2000). A source activation theory of working memory: Cross-task prediction of performance in ACT-R. Journal of Cognitive Systems Research, 1, 99–118.
Masson, M. (1991). Understanding, reporting and preventing human fixation errors. In T. W. v. d. Schaaf, D. A. Lucas & A. Hale (Eds.), Near miss reporting as a safety tool (pp. 35–50). Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Nickerson, R. S., & Adams, M. J. (1979). Long-term memory for a common object. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 287–307.
Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. Chestnut Hill, MA: AP Professional Press.
Norman, D. A. (1981). Categorization of action slips. Psychological Review, 88, 1–15.
Norman, D. A. (2006). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Norman, D. A. (2009). The design of future things. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Norman, D. A. (2013). The design of everyday things. NY: Basic Books.
Payne, S. J. (1995). Naive judgments of stimulus-response compatibility. Human Factors, 37, 495–506.
Petroski, H. (1985/1992). To engineer is human: The role of failure in successful design. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
Pew, R. W., & Mavor, A. S. (Eds.). (2007). Human-system integration in the system development process: A new look. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. http://books.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11893. Accessed 10 March 2014.
Pheasant, S., & Haslegrave, C. M. (2006). Bodyspace: Anthropometry, ergonomics, and the design of work (3rd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.
Preece, J., Rogers, Y., & Sharp, H. (2002). Interaction design. New York, NY: Wiley.
Reason, J. (1990). Human error. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ritter, F. E., Freed, A. R., & Haskett, O. L. (2005). User information needs: The case of university department web sites. ACM interactions, 12(5), 19–27. acs.ist.psu.edu/acs-lab/reports/ritterFH02.pdf.
Salvendy, G. (Ed.). (1997). Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
Sheridan, T. B. (1992). Telerobotics, automation, and human supervisory control. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tambe, M., Johnson, W. L., Jones, R. M., Koss, F., Laird, J. E., Rosenbloom, P. S., et al. (1995). Intelligent agents for interactive simulation environments. AI Magazine, 16(1), 15–40.
Tractinsky, N. (1997). Aesthetics and apparent usability: Empirically assessing cultural and methodological issues. In CHI ‘97 (pp. 115–122). New York, NY: ACM. http://sigchi.org/chi97/proceedings/paper/nt.htm. Accessed 11 March 2014.
Tufte, E. R. (1990). Envisioning information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
Weiland, W., Szczepkowski, M., Urban, G., Mitchell, T., Lyons, D., & Soles, R. (2002). Reusing cognitive models: Leveraging SCOTT technology in an LCAC virtual training environment. In Proceedings of the 11th Computer Generated Forces Conference, 02-CGF-115. Orlando, FL: U. of Central Florida.
White, A. W. (2002). The elements of graphic design: Space, unity, page architecture, and type. New York, NY: Allworth Press.
Wickens, C. D., Gordon, S. E., & Liu, Y. (1998). An introduction to human factors engineering. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley.
Wickens, C. D., & Hollands, J. G. (2000). Engineering psychology and human performance (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ritter, F.E., Baxter, G.D., Churchill, E.F. (2014). Introducing User-Centered Systems Design. In: Foundations for Designing User-Centered Systems. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5134-0_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5134-0_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5133-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5134-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)