Introducing User-Centered Systems Design

  • Frank E. Ritter
  • Gordon D. Baxter
  • Elizabeth F. Churchill
Chapter

Abstract

If designers and developers want to design better technologies that are intended for human use they need to have a good understanding of the people who are or who will be using their systems. Understanding people, their characteristics, capabilities, commonalities, and differences allows designers to create more effective, safer, efficient, and enjoyable systems. This book provides readers with resources for thinking about people—commonly called “users”—their tasks and the context in which they perform those tasks. Our intention is to enable you to make more informed decisions when designing complex interactive systems. This chapter thus introduces this argument through example design problems. We then present the benefits and costs associated with understanding the user. Two approaches for understanding users are introduced. The first is a framework called the ABCS for understanding, in broad strokes, different aspects of users. The second is user knowledge and action simulation for developing and testing how users approach tasks in more detail. After reading this chapter you should be able to appreciate why it is important to understand users, and the associated benefits and costs of doing so.

Keywords

Burner Fatigue Microwave Europe Transportation 

References

  1. Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M. D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C., & Qin, Y. (2004). An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1036–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baxter, G. D., Monk, A. F., Tan, K., Dear, P. R. F., & Newell, S. J. (2005). Using cognitive task analysis to facilitate the integration of decision support systems into the neonatal intensive care unit. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 35, 243–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boff, K. R., & Lincoln, J. E. (Eds.). (1988). Engineering data compendium (User’s guide). Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH: Harry G. Armstrong Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory.Google Scholar
  5. Booher, H. R., & Minninger, J. (2003). Human systems integration in army systems acquisition. In H. R. Booher (Ed.), Handbook of human systems integration (pp. 663–698). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, C. M. L. (1988). Human-computer interface design guidelines. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  7. Bruce, V., Gilmore, D., Mason, L., & Mayhew, P. (1983). Factors affecting the perceived value of coins. Journal of Economic Psychology, 4(4), 335–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Byrne, M. D. (2001). ACT-R/PM and menu selection: Applying a cognitive architecture to HCI. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 55(1), 41–84.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Casper, J., & Murphy, R. (2003). Human-robot interactions during the robot-assisted urban search and rescue response at the World Trade Center. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part B, 33(3), 367–385.Google Scholar
  10. Chapanis, A., & Lindenbaum, L. E. (1959). A reaction time study of four control-display linkages. Human Factors, 1(4), 1–7.Google Scholar
  11. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. Fitts, P. M. (1951). Engineering psychology and equipment design. In S. S. Stevens (Ed.), Handbook of experimental psychology (pp. 1287–1340). New York, NY: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Flowers, S. (1997). Software failure: Management failure… Amazing stories and cautionary tales. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Freed, M., & Remington, R. (2000). Making human-machine system simulation a practical engineering tool: An APEX overview. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Cognitive Modelling (pp. 110–117). Veenendaal, The Netherlands: Universal Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gigerenzer, G. (2004). Dread risk, september 11, and fatal traffic accidents. Psychological Science, 15(4), 286–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glushko, R. J., & Tabas, L. (2009). Designing service systems by bridging the “front stage” and “back stage”. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 7(4), 407–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gray, W. D., John, B. E., & Atwood, M. E. (1992). The precis of project Ernestine or an overview of a validation of GOMS. In Proceedings of the CHI‘92 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems. New York, NY: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  18. Gray, W. D., John, B. E., & Atwood, M. E. (1993). Project Ernestine: Validating a GOMS analysis for predicting and explaining real-world task performance. Human-Computer Interaction, 8(3), 237–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Helander, M. G., & Tham, M. P. (2003). Hedonomics: Affective human factors design. Ergonomics, 46(13/14), 1269–1272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Holmes, N. (2005). The Internet, the Web, and the Chaos. IEEE Computer, 38(108), 106–107.Google Scholar
  21. Johnson, E. J., Bellman, S., & Lohse, G. L. (2003). Cognitive lock-in and the power law of practice. Journal of Marketing, 67, 62–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jones, G., Ritter, F. E., & Wood, D. J. (2000). Using a cognitive architecture to examine what develops. Psychological Science, 11(2), 93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jones, R. M., Laird, J. E., Nielsen, P. E., Coulter, K. J., Kenny, P., & Koss, F. V. (1999). Automated intelligent pilots for combat flight simulation. AI Magazine, 20(1), 27–41.Google Scholar
  24. Jordan, P. W. (2000). Designing pleasurable products. London: Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kieras, D. E., Wood, S. D., & Meyer, D. E. (1997). Predictive engineering models based on the EPIC architecture for a multimodal high-performance human-computer interaction task. Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 4(3), 230–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kosslyn, S. M. (2007). Clear and to the point: 8 psychological principles for creating compelling Powerpoint presentations. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Laird, J. E., & van Lent, M. (2001). Human-level AI’s killer application: Interactive computer games. AI Magazine, 22(2), 15–26.Google Scholar
  28. Leveson, N. G., & Turner, C. S. (1993). An investigation of the Therac-25 accidents. IEEE Computer, 26(7), 18–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lovett, M. C., Daily, L. Z., & Reder, L. M. (2000). A source activation theory of working memory: Cross-task prediction of performance in ACT-R. Journal of Cognitive Systems Research, 1, 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Masson, M. (1991). Understanding, reporting and preventing human fixation errors. In T. W. v. d. Schaaf, D. A. Lucas & A. Hale (Eds.), Near miss reporting as a safety tool (pp. 35–50). Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  31. Nickerson, R. S., & Adams, M. J. (1979). Long-term memory for a common object. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 287–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. Chestnut Hill, MA: AP Professional Press.MATHGoogle Scholar
  33. Norman, D. A. (1981). Categorization of action slips. Psychological Review, 88, 1–15.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Norman, D. A. (2006). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  35. Norman, D. A. (2009). The design of future things. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  36. Norman, D. A. (2013). The design of everyday things. NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  37. Payne, S. J. (1995). Naive judgments of stimulus-response compatibility. Human Factors, 37, 495–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Petroski, H. (1985/1992). To engineer is human: The role of failure in successful design. New York, NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  39. Pew, R. W., & Mavor, A. S. (Eds.). (2007). Human-system integration in the system development process: A new look. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. http://books.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11893. Accessed 10 March 2014.
  40. Pheasant, S., & Haslegrave, C. M. (2006). Bodyspace: Anthropometry, ergonomics, and the design of work (3rd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  41. Preece, J., Rogers, Y., & Sharp, H. (2002). Interaction design. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  42. Reason, J. (1990). Human error. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ritter, F. E., Freed, A. R., & Haskett, O. L. (2005). User information needs: The case of university department web sites. ACM interactions, 12(5), 19–27. acs.ist.psu.edu/acs-lab/reports/ritterFH02.pdf.
  44. Salvendy, G. (Ed.). (1997). Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  45. Sheridan, T. B. (1992). Telerobotics, automation, and human supervisory control. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  46. Tambe, M., Johnson, W. L., Jones, R. M., Koss, F., Laird, J. E., Rosenbloom, P. S., et al. (1995). Intelligent agents for interactive simulation environments. AI Magazine, 16(1), 15–40.Google Scholar
  47. Tractinsky, N. (1997). Aesthetics and apparent usability: Empirically assessing cultural and methodological issues. In CHI ‘97 (pp. 115–122). New York, NY: ACM. http://sigchi.org/chi97/proceedings/paper/nt.htm. Accessed 11 March 2014.
  48. Tufte, E. R. (1990). Envisioning information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.Google Scholar
  49. Weiland, W., Szczepkowski, M., Urban, G., Mitchell, T., Lyons, D., & Soles, R. (2002). Reusing cognitive models: Leveraging SCOTT technology in an LCAC virtual training environment. In Proceedings of the 11th Computer Generated Forces Conference, 02-CGF-115. Orlando, FL: U. of Central Florida.Google Scholar
  50. White, A. W. (2002). The elements of graphic design: Space, unity, page architecture, and type. New York, NY: Allworth Press.Google Scholar
  51. Wickens, C. D., Gordon, S. E., & Liu, Y. (1998). An introduction to human factors engineering. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  52. Wickens, C. D., & Hollands, J. G. (2000). Engineering psychology and human performance (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank E. Ritter
    • 1
  • Gordon D. Baxter
    • 2
  • Elizabeth F. Churchill
    • 3
  1. 1.College of ISTThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  2. 2.School of Computer ScienceUniversity of St AndrewsSt AndrewsUK
  3. 3.eBay Research LabsSan JoseUSA

Personalised recommendations