Skip to main content

Systemic Cognition: Human Artifice in Life and Language

  • Chapter
Book cover Cognition Beyond the Brain

Abstract

Rather than rely on functionalist or enactivist principles, Cognition Beyond the Brain traces thinking to human artifice. In pursuing this approach, we gradually developed what can be deemed a third position in cognitive science. This is because, like talking, doing things with artefacts draws on both biological and cultural principles. On this systemic view, skills embody beliefs, roles and social practices. Since people rely on interactivity or sense-saturated coordination, action also re-enacts cultural history. Bidirectional dynamics connect embodiment to non-local regularities. Thinking thus emerges in a temporal trajectory of action that takes place within a space populated by people and objects. Utterances, thoughts and deeds all draw on physical, biological and cultural constraints. Even plans are shaped as first-order activity is shaped by second-order structures. Intentions and learning arise as dynamics in one time-scale are co-regulated by dynamics in other scales. For example, in ontogenesis, interactivity prompts a child to strategic use of second-order language. By linking cultural scales to inter-bodily dynamics, circumstances are coloured by resources that serve in using simulation to manage thought, feeling and action. The systemic nature of cognition connects now, the adjacent possible, implications for others and, potentially, social and environmental change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In Douglas Adams’s (1979) ‘The hitchhiker’s guide to the galaxy’ a super-computer calculated the answer to ‘What is the meaning of the life, the universe and everything?’ to be ‘42’. In making this link, we treat a digital product as separable from some kind of process.

  2. 2.

    We diverge from Järvilehto slightly in that his focus is on constituents of the living system. We, by contrast, are equally concerned with the role played by historical and nonliving parts.

  3. 3.

    Following Sharov (2010), functional information can be traced to “a set of signs that encode the functions of the organism” and, in addition, of “signs that control the functions” (1058). Functional information thus includes genome, epigenome, internal messengers (e.g., mRNA, miRNA, transcription factors, kinases, and phosphatases), external messengers (e.g., pheromones), and natural signs (e.g., temperature and salinity of water). Moreover, the notion of functional information also applies to artificial signs (and what agents treat as signs). This view is narrower than Pattee’s characterisation of living systems in relation to the self-organization of parameters or symbols that measure and control their dynamics. In evolution, symbols often lose their functions; however, signs are events that an agent uses/interprets in functional ways.

  4. 4.

    Stuart (2010) invokes enkinaesthesia or felt bidirectional coupling between organism and environment. Since it applies to most (perhaps all) living species, it leaves out non-local phenomena such as language and culture.

  5. 5.

    While this artificial kind of interactivity pertains to an individual’s thinking—not processes between people—it shows how a machine can sponsor human actions.

  6. 6.

    “Nevertheless, there remains a fundamental asymmetry in my view. I want to call a system cognitive because it produces cognitive outputs, but refuse to call it knowledgeable because it produces knowledge. For me, the latter makes as little sense as calling a system edible because it was designed to produce edibles” (Giere 2011: 397).

  7. 7.

    For example the authors differ on the status of brain-side representations: while one of us sees no reason to challenge these, the other thinks that appeal to neural representations is mistaken. However, on our view of cognition, this matters little. Even brain-side, it may be a matter of the level of description.

  8. 8.

    Cowley (2012) takes a more radical view: given mimesis, he argues that spoken language—like writing and computers—draws on the co-evolution of h. sapiens and the extended ecology (see also, Donald 2012).

References

  • Adams, D. (1979). The hitchhiker’s guide to the galaxy. London: Baker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auvray, M., Lenay, C., & Stewart, J. (2009). Perceptual interactions in a minimalist virtual environment. New Ideas in Psychology, 27, 32–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baber, C. (2013). Distributed cognition at the crime scene. In S. J. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: interactivity, computation and human artifice. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, L. J., & Litchfield, D. (2013). Interactivity and embodied cues in problem solving and insight: further contributions to a “theory of hints”. In S. J. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: interactivity, computation and human artifice. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, M. (2009). A short history of biosemiotics. Biosemiotics, 2, 221–245.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Naim, J., Bonnefon, J. F., Herzig, A., Leblois, S., & Lorini, E. (2013). Computer-mediated trust in self-interested expert recommendation. In S. J. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: interactivity, computation and human artifice. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, N. A. (1967). The co-ordination and regulation of movements. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berthoz, A. (2010). La conscience du corps. In A. Berthoz & B. Andrieu (Eds.), Le Corps en acte. Nancy: Presses Universitaires de Nancy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berthoz, A. (2012). On simplexity: simplifying principles for a complex world. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, G., & Cowley, S. J. (2003). Language in iterating activity: microcognition remembered. Alternation, 10, 132–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottineau, D. (2010). Language and enaction. In J. Stewart, O. Gapenne, & E. Di Paolo (Eds.), Enaction: toward a new paradigm for cognitive science (pp. 267–306). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottineau, D. (2012). Remembering voice past: languaging as an embodied interactive cognitive technique. In Proceedings of the humanities international forum. Moscow: Russian State University for the Humanities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (1996). Magic words: how language augments human computation. In P. Carruthers & J. Boucher (Eds.), Language and thought: interdisciplinary themes (pp. 162–183). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: embodiment, action and cognitive extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowley, S. J. (2003). Distributed cognition at three months: mother-infant dyads in kwaZulu Natal. Alternation, 10, 229–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowley, S. J. (2004). Contextualizing bodies. Language Sciences, 26, 273–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowley, S. J. (2007). Cognitive dynamics and distributed language. Language Sciences, 29, 575–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowley, S. J. (2011). Distributed language. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowley, S. J. (2012). Mimesis and language: a distributed view. Interaction Studies, 13, 17–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowley, S. J., & Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (2010). Thinking in action. AI & Society, 25, 469–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C. (1991). Consciousness explained. Boston: Little, Brown & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1896). On the reflex arc in psychology. Psychological Review, 3, 357–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donald, M. (1991). The origins of the modern mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald, M. (2001). A mind so rare. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald, M. (2007). The slow process: a hypothetical cognitive adaptation for distributed cognitive networks. Journal of Physiology (Paris), 101, 214–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donald, M. (2012). Commentary on Cowley’s chapter. Interaction Studies, 13, 41–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. (2010). Thinking twice: two minds in one brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fioratou, E., & Cowley, S. J. (2009). Insightful thinking: cognitive dynamics and material artifacts. Pragmatics & Cognition, 17, 549–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froese, T., & Gallagher, S. (2012). Getting Interaction Theory (IT) together: integrating developmental, phenomenological, enactive, and dynamical approaches to social interaction. Interaction Studies, 13(3), 436–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere, R. N. (2004). The problem of agency in scientific distributed cognitive systems. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 4, 759–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giere, R. N. (2011). Distributed cognition as human centered although not human bound: reply to Vaesen. Social Epistemology: A Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy, 25, 393–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gintis, H., & Gintis, H. (2011). Gene–culture coevolution and the nature of human sociality. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 366, 878–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1971). Language. In Poetry, language, thought (pp. 185–208). London: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemmingsen, B. (2013). The quick and the dead: on temporality and human agency. In S. J. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: interactivity, computation and human artifice. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Kirsh, D. (2000). Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7, 174–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1995). How a cockpit remembers its speed. Cognitive Science, 19, 265–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. I). New York: Dover.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Järvilehto, T. (2000). The theory of the organism-environment system: IV. The problem on mental activity and consciousness. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science, 35, 35–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Järvilehto, T. (2009). The theory of the organism-environment system as a basis of experimental work in psychology. Ecological Psychology, 21, 112–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Järvilehto, T., Nurkkala, V. M., & Koskela, K. (2009). The role of anticipation in reading. Pragmatics & Cognition, 17(3), 509–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P. (2013). You want a piece of me? Paying your dues and getting your due in a distributed world. In S. J. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: interactivity, computation and human artifice. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiousis, S. (2002). Interactivity: a concept explication. New Media & Society, 4, 355–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsh, D. (1997). Interactivity and multimedia interfaces. Instructional Science, 25, 79–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsh, D. (2013). Thinking with external representations. In S. J. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: interactivity, computation and human artifice. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsh, D., & Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic actions. Cognitive Science, 18, 513–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiverstein, J., & Farina, M. (2011). Embraining culture: leaky minds and spongy brains. Teorema, 32.2, 35–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kravchenko, A. (2007). Essential properties of language: why language is not a digital code. Language Sciences, 29, 621–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kravchenko, A. (2011). How Humberto Maturana’s biology of cognition can revive the language sciences. Constructivist Foundations, 6, 352–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linell, P. (2005). The written language bias in linguistics: its nature, origins and transformations. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Love, N. (2004). Cognition and the language myth. Language Sciences, 26, 525–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumsden, C. J., & Wilson, E. O. (1981). Genes, mind, and culture: the coevolutionary process. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markoš, A., Švorcová, J., & Lhotský, J. (2013). Living as languaging: distributed knowledge in living beings. In S. J. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: interactivity, computation and human artifice. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr, D. (1982). Vision: a computational investigation into the human representational system and the processing of visual information. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R. (1975). The organization of the living: a theory of the living organization. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 7, 313–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1932). The philosophy of the present. Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monod, J. (1966). From enzymatic adaptation to allosteric transitions. Science, 154, 475–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, M., & Cowley, S. J. (2013). Human agency and the resources of reason. In S. J. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: interactivity, computation and human artifice. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattee, H. H. (1996). The problem of observables in models of biological organizations. In E. L. Khalil & K. E. Boulding (Eds.), Evolution, order, and complexity (pp. 249–264). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattee, H. H., & Rączaszek-Leonardi, J. (2012). Laws, language and life: Howard Pattee’s classic papers on the physics of symbols. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1940). The philosophy of Peirce. London: Routledge. J. Buchler (Ed.).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, M. (2013). Socially distributed cognition in loosely coupled systems. In S. J. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: interactivity, computation and human artifice. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rączaszek-Leonardi, J., & Cowley, S. J. (2012). The evolution of language as controlled collectivity. Interaction Studies, 13, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, D. (2007). H. sapiens as ecologically special: what does language contribute? Language Sciences, 29, 710–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharov, A. A. (2010). Functional information: towards synthesis of biosemiotics and cybernetics. Entropy, 12, 1050–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiekermann, K. (2013). Judgement aggregation and distributed thinking. In S. J. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: interactivity, computation and human artifice. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spurrett, D., & Cowley, S. J. (2004). How to do things without words. Language Sciences, 26, 443–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffensen, S. V. (2011). Beyond mind: an extended ecology of languaging. In S. J. Cowley (Ed.), Distributed language (pp. 185–210). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffensen, S. V. (2013). Human interactivity: problem-solving, solution-probing and verbal patterns in the wild. In S. J. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: interactivity, computation and human artifice. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J., Gapenne, O., & Di Paolo, E. (Eds.) (2010). Enaction: toward a new paradigm for cognitive science (pp. 33–87). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, S. A. (2010). Enkinaesthesia, biosemiotics and the ethiosphere. In S. J. Cowley, J. C. Major, S. V. Steffensen, & A. Dinis (Eds.), Signifying bodies: biosemiosis, interaction and health (pp. 305–330). Braga: Portuguese Catholic University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibault, P. J. (2011). First-order languaging dynamics and second-order language: the distributed language view. Ecological Psychology, 23, 210–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. (2007a). Mind and life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. (2007b). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallée-Tourangeau, F., & Villejoubert, G. (2013). Naturalising problem solving. In S. J. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: interactivity, computation and human artifice. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll, J. (1926). Theoretical biology. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallot, S., & Van Orden, G. (2011). Grounding language in the anticipatory dynamics of the body. Ecological Psychology, 23, 157–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, M. (2004). Is language the ultimate artifact? Language Sciences, 26, 693–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. W. (1958). Philosophical investigations (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen J. Cowley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cowley, S.J., Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (2013). Systemic Cognition: Human Artifice in Life and Language. In: Cowley, S., Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (eds) Cognition Beyond the Brain. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5125-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5125-8_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5124-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5125-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics