Abstract
Rather than rely on functionalist or enactivist principles, Cognition Beyond the Brain traces thinking to human artifice. In pursuing this approach, we gradually developed what can be deemed a third position in cognitive science. This is because, like talking, doing things with artefacts draws on both biological and cultural principles. On this systemic view, skills embody beliefs, roles and social practices. Since people rely on interactivity or sense-saturated coordination, action also re-enacts cultural history. Bidirectional dynamics connect embodiment to non-local regularities. Thinking thus emerges in a temporal trajectory of action that takes place within a space populated by people and objects. Utterances, thoughts and deeds all draw on physical, biological and cultural constraints. Even plans are shaped as first-order activity is shaped by second-order structures. Intentions and learning arise as dynamics in one time-scale are co-regulated by dynamics in other scales. For example, in ontogenesis, interactivity prompts a child to strategic use of second-order language. By linking cultural scales to inter-bodily dynamics, circumstances are coloured by resources that serve in using simulation to manage thought, feeling and action. The systemic nature of cognition connects now, the adjacent possible, implications for others and, potentially, social and environmental change.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In Douglas Adams’s (1979) ‘The hitchhiker’s guide to the galaxy’ a super-computer calculated the answer to ‘What is the meaning of the life, the universe and everything?’ to be ‘42’. In making this link, we treat a digital product as separable from some kind of process.
- 2.
We diverge from Järvilehto slightly in that his focus is on constituents of the living system. We, by contrast, are equally concerned with the role played by historical and nonliving parts.
- 3.
Following Sharov (2010), functional information can be traced to “a set of signs that encode the functions of the organism” and, in addition, of “signs that control the functions” (1058). Functional information thus includes genome, epigenome, internal messengers (e.g., mRNA, miRNA, transcription factors, kinases, and phosphatases), external messengers (e.g., pheromones), and natural signs (e.g., temperature and salinity of water). Moreover, the notion of functional information also applies to artificial signs (and what agents treat as signs). This view is narrower than Pattee’s characterisation of living systems in relation to the self-organization of parameters or symbols that measure and control their dynamics. In evolution, symbols often lose their functions; however, signs are events that an agent uses/interprets in functional ways.
- 4.
Stuart (2010) invokes enkinaesthesia or felt bidirectional coupling between organism and environment. Since it applies to most (perhaps all) living species, it leaves out non-local phenomena such as language and culture.
- 5.
While this artificial kind of interactivity pertains to an individual’s thinking—not processes between people—it shows how a machine can sponsor human actions.
- 6.
“Nevertheless, there remains a fundamental asymmetry in my view. I want to call a system cognitive because it produces cognitive outputs, but refuse to call it knowledgeable because it produces knowledge. For me, the latter makes as little sense as calling a system edible because it was designed to produce edibles” (Giere 2011: 397).
- 7.
For example the authors differ on the status of brain-side representations: while one of us sees no reason to challenge these, the other thinks that appeal to neural representations is mistaken. However, on our view of cognition, this matters little. Even brain-side, it may be a matter of the level of description.
- 8.
References
Adams, D. (1979). The hitchhiker’s guide to the galaxy. London: Baker.
Auvray, M., Lenay, C., & Stewart, J. (2009). Perceptual interactions in a minimalist virtual environment. New Ideas in Psychology, 27, 32–47.
Baber, C. (2013). Distributed cognition at the crime scene. In S. J. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: interactivity, computation and human artifice. Dordrecht: Springer.
Ball, L. J., & Litchfield, D. (2013). Interactivity and embodied cues in problem solving and insight: further contributions to a “theory of hints”. In S. J. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: interactivity, computation and human artifice. Dordrecht: Springer.
Barbieri, M. (2009). A short history of biosemiotics. Biosemiotics, 2, 221–245.
Ben-Naim, J., Bonnefon, J. F., Herzig, A., Leblois, S., & Lorini, E. (2013). Computer-mediated trust in self-interested expert recommendation. In S. J. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: interactivity, computation and human artifice. Dordrecht: Springer.
Bernstein, N. A. (1967). The co-ordination and regulation of movements. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Berthoz, A. (2010). La conscience du corps. In A. Berthoz & B. Andrieu (Eds.), Le Corps en acte. Nancy: Presses Universitaires de Nancy.
Berthoz, A. (2012). On simplexity: simplifying principles for a complex world. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Blair, G., & Cowley, S. J. (2003). Language in iterating activity: microcognition remembered. Alternation, 10, 132–162.
Bottineau, D. (2010). Language and enaction. In J. Stewart, O. Gapenne, & E. Di Paolo (Eds.), Enaction: toward a new paradigm for cognitive science (pp. 267–306). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Bottineau, D. (2012). Remembering voice past: languaging as an embodied interactive cognitive technique. In Proceedings of the humanities international forum. Moscow: Russian State University for the Humanities.
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton and Co.
Clark, A. (1996). Magic words: how language augments human computation. In P. Carruthers & J. Boucher (Eds.), Language and thought: interdisciplinary themes (pp. 162–183). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: embodiment, action and cognitive extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cowley, S. J. (2003). Distributed cognition at three months: mother-infant dyads in kwaZulu Natal. Alternation, 10, 229–257.
Cowley, S. J. (2004). Contextualizing bodies. Language Sciences, 26, 273–299.
Cowley, S. J. (2007). Cognitive dynamics and distributed language. Language Sciences, 29, 575–583.
Cowley, S. J. (2011). Distributed language. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Cowley, S. J. (2012). Mimesis and language: a distributed view. Interaction Studies, 13, 17–40.
Cowley, S. J., & Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (2010). Thinking in action. AI & Society, 25, 469–475.
Dennett, D. C. (1991). Consciousness explained. Boston: Little, Brown & Company.
Dewey, J. (1896). On the reflex arc in psychology. Psychological Review, 3, 357–370.
Donald, M. (1991). The origins of the modern mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Donald, M. (2001). A mind so rare. New York: Norton.
Donald, M. (2007). The slow process: a hypothetical cognitive adaptation for distributed cognitive networks. Journal of Physiology (Paris), 101, 214–222.
Donald, M. (2012). Commentary on Cowley’s chapter. Interaction Studies, 13, 41–49.
Evans, J. (2010). Thinking twice: two minds in one brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fioratou, E., & Cowley, S. J. (2009). Insightful thinking: cognitive dynamics and material artifacts. Pragmatics & Cognition, 17, 549–572.
Froese, T., & Gallagher, S. (2012). Getting Interaction Theory (IT) together: integrating developmental, phenomenological, enactive, and dynamical approaches to social interaction. Interaction Studies, 13(3), 436–468.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Giere, R. N. (2004). The problem of agency in scientific distributed cognitive systems. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 4, 759–774.
Giere, R. N. (2011). Distributed cognition as human centered although not human bound: reply to Vaesen. Social Epistemology: A Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy, 25, 393–399.
Gintis, H., & Gintis, H. (2011). Gene–culture coevolution and the nature of human sociality. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 366, 878–888.
Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Heidegger, M. (1971). Language. In Poetry, language, thought (pp. 185–208). London: Harper Collins.
Hemmingsen, B. (2013). The quick and the dead: on temporality and human agency. In S. J. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: interactivity, computation and human artifice. Dordrecht: Springer.
Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Kirsh, D. (2000). Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7, 174–196.
Hutchins, E. (1995). How a cockpit remembers its speed. Cognitive Science, 19, 265–288.
James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. I). New York: Dover.
Järvilehto, T. (2000). The theory of the organism-environment system: IV. The problem on mental activity and consciousness. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science, 35, 35–57.
Järvilehto, T. (2009). The theory of the organism-environment system as a basis of experimental work in psychology. Ecological Psychology, 21, 112–120.
Järvilehto, T., Nurkkala, V. M., & Koskela, K. (2009). The role of anticipation in reading. Pragmatics & Cognition, 17(3), 509–526.
Jones, P. (2013). You want a piece of me? Paying your dues and getting your due in a distributed world. In S. J. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: interactivity, computation and human artifice. Dordrecht: Springer.
Kiousis, S. (2002). Interactivity: a concept explication. New Media & Society, 4, 355–383.
Kirsh, D. (1997). Interactivity and multimedia interfaces. Instructional Science, 25, 79–96.
Kirsh, D. (2013). Thinking with external representations. In S. J. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: interactivity, computation and human artifice. Dordrecht: Springer.
Kirsh, D., & Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic actions. Cognitive Science, 18, 513–549.
Kiverstein, J., & Farina, M. (2011). Embraining culture: leaky minds and spongy brains. Teorema, 32.2, 35–53.
Kravchenko, A. (2007). Essential properties of language: why language is not a digital code. Language Sciences, 29, 621–650.
Kravchenko, A. (2011). How Humberto Maturana’s biology of cognition can revive the language sciences. Constructivist Foundations, 6, 352–362.
Linell, P. (2005). The written language bias in linguistics: its nature, origins and transformations. London: Routledge.
Love, N. (2004). Cognition and the language myth. Language Sciences, 26, 525–544.
Lumsden, C. J., & Wilson, E. O. (1981). Genes, mind, and culture: the coevolutionary process. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Markoš, A., Švorcová, J., & Lhotský, J. (2013). Living as languaging: distributed knowledge in living beings. In S. J. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: interactivity, computation and human artifice. Dordrecht: Springer.
Marr, D. (1982). Vision: a computational investigation into the human representational system and the processing of visual information. San Francisco: Freeman.
Maturana, H. R. (1975). The organization of the living: a theory of the living organization. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 7, 313–332.
Mead, G. H. (1932). The philosophy of the present. Chicago: Open Court.
Monod, J. (1966). From enzymatic adaptation to allosteric transitions. Science, 154, 475–483.
Neumann, M., & Cowley, S. J. (2013). Human agency and the resources of reason. In S. J. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: interactivity, computation and human artifice. Dordrecht: Springer.
Pattee, H. H. (1996). The problem of observables in models of biological organizations. In E. L. Khalil & K. E. Boulding (Eds.), Evolution, order, and complexity (pp. 249–264). London: Routledge.
Pattee, H. H., & Rączaszek-Leonardi, J. (2012). Laws, language and life: Howard Pattee’s classic papers on the physics of symbols. Dordrecht: Springer.
Peirce, C. S. (1940). The philosophy of Peirce. London: Routledge. J. Buchler (Ed.).
Perry, M. (2013). Socially distributed cognition in loosely coupled systems. In S. J. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: interactivity, computation and human artifice. Dordrecht: Springer.
Rączaszek-Leonardi, J., & Cowley, S. J. (2012). The evolution of language as controlled collectivity. Interaction Studies, 13, 1–16.
Ross, D. (2007). H. sapiens as ecologically special: what does language contribute? Language Sciences, 29, 710–731.
Sharov, A. A. (2010). Functional information: towards synthesis of biosemiotics and cybernetics. Entropy, 12, 1050–1070.
Spiekermann, K. (2013). Judgement aggregation and distributed thinking. In S. J. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: interactivity, computation and human artifice. Dordrecht: Springer.
Spurrett, D., & Cowley, S. J. (2004). How to do things without words. Language Sciences, 26, 443–466.
Steffensen, S. V. (2011). Beyond mind: an extended ecology of languaging. In S. J. Cowley (Ed.), Distributed language (pp. 185–210). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Steffensen, S. V. (2013). Human interactivity: problem-solving, solution-probing and verbal patterns in the wild. In S. J. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: interactivity, computation and human artifice. Dordrecht: Springer.
Stewart, J., Gapenne, O., & Di Paolo, E. (Eds.) (2010). Enaction: toward a new paradigm for cognitive science (pp. 33–87). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Stuart, S. A. (2010). Enkinaesthesia, biosemiotics and the ethiosphere. In S. J. Cowley, J. C. Major, S. V. Steffensen, & A. Dinis (Eds.), Signifying bodies: biosemiosis, interaction and health (pp. 305–330). Braga: Portuguese Catholic University Press.
Thibault, P. J. (2011). First-order languaging dynamics and second-order language: the distributed language view. Ecological Psychology, 23, 210–245.
Thompson, E. (2007a). Mind and life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Thompson, E. (2007b). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Cambridge: Belknap Press.
Vallée-Tourangeau, F., & Villejoubert, G. (2013). Naturalising problem solving. In S. J. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: interactivity, computation and human artifice. Dordrecht: Springer.
Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.
von Uexküll, J. (1926). Theoretical biology. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.
Wallot, S., & Van Orden, G. (2011). Grounding language in the anticipatory dynamics of the body. Ecological Psychology, 23, 157–184.
Wheeler, M. (2004). Is language the ultimate artifact? Language Sciences, 26, 693–715.
Wittgenstein, L. W. (1958). Philosophical investigations (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cowley, S.J., Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (2013). Systemic Cognition: Human Artifice in Life and Language. In: Cowley, S., Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (eds) Cognition Beyond the Brain. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5125-8_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5125-8_14
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5124-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5125-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)