Advertisement

Introduction to Engineering Informatics

  • Narges Sajadfar
  • Yanan Xie
  • Hongyi Liu
  • Y.-S. Ma
Chapter
Part of the Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing book series (SSAM)

Abstract

This work offers a panorama view about a new engineering science discipline: Engineering Informatics. Engineering informatics is an applied information science sub-domain that is scoped to address the information technology (IT) knowledge, methods, models, and algorithms that support engineering and management activities ranging from customer requirements to design and production operations. In this work, a number of key application areas of engineering informatics are analyzed, i.e. product development, measuring product development performance, and concurrent and collaborative engineering. In addition, a special engineering informatics application domain, chemical engineering, is reviewed in order to illustrate an industry-specific scenario. Two fundamental technologies of engineering informatics, object-oriented (OO) software engineering and semantic modeling, are briefly introduced.

Keywords

Unify Modeling Language Virtual World Semantic Modeling Product Development Process Concurrent Engineering 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Abbott KR, Sarin SK (1994) Experiences with workflow management: issues for the next generation. In: Proceedings of ACM CSCW 84, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USAGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adams M (2004) Comparative performance assessment study. In: Proceedings of the presentation at the comparative performance assessment conference, PDMA FoundationGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aspentech (2012) http://www.aspentech.com/
  4. 4.
    Babcock B, Babu S, Datar M, Motwani R, Widom J (2002) Models and issues in data stream systems. In: Proceedings of ACM PODS, Madison, Wisconsin, USAGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bae J, Kim J (2011) Product development with data mining techniques: a case on design of digital camera. Expert Syst with Appl 38:9274–9280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Bidarra R, Bronsvoort WF (2000) Semantic feature modeling. Comput Aided Des 32:201–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bronsvoort WF, Noort A (2004) Multiple-view feature modeling for integral product development. Comput Aided Des 36:929–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cai M, Zhang WY, Chen G, Zhang K, Li ST (2010) SWMRD: a semantic web-based manufacturing resource discovery system for cross-enterprise collaboration. Int J Prod Res 48:3445–3460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chan FTS, Zhang J (2001) Modeling for agile manufacturing systems. Int J Prod Res 39:2313–2332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen G, Ma YS, Thimm G et al (2006) Associations in a unified feature modeling scheme. ASME Trans J Comput Inf Sci Eng 6:114–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Contea E, Gania R, Malikb TI (2011) The virtual product-process design laboratory to manage the complexity in the verification of formulated products. Fluid Phase Equilib 302:294–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Driva H, Pawar KS, Menon U (2000) Measuring product development performance in manufacturing organizations. Int J Prod Econ 63:147–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    D’Souza DF, Wills AC (1999) Objects, components, and frameworks with UML—the catalysisSM approach. Addison Wesley Longman, Reading, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Geelink R, Salomons OW, van Slooten F, van Houten F, Kals HJJ (1995) Unified feature definition for feature based design and feature based manufacturing. In Busnaina A (ed) Comput in Eng, ASME Conf., 517–533Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Georgakopoulos D, Hornick M, Sheth A (1995) An overview of workflow management: from process modeling to workflow automation infrastructure. Distrib Parallel Databases 3:119–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hanis T, Noller D (2012) The role of semantic models in smarter industrial operations. IBM DeveloperWorks. http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/industry/library/ind-semanticmodels/ind-semanticmodels-pdf.pdf. Accessed 18 Nov 2012
  18. 18.
    Herder PM, Weijnen MPC (2000) A concurrent engineering approach to chemical process design. Int J Prod Econ 64:311–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Intergraph (2012) http://www.intergraph.com/
  20. 20.
    Jouini BM (2004) Time-to-market vs. time-to-delivery: managing speed in engineering, procurement and construction projects. Int J Proj Manag 25:359–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kima J, Prattb M, Iyer RG et al (2008) Standardized data exchange of CAD models with design intent. Comput Aided Des 40:760–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Körtgen A, Nagl M (2011) Tools for consistency management between design products. Comput Chem Eng 35:724–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lee SH (2005) A CAD–CAE integration approach using feature-based multi-resolution and multi-abstraction modeling techniques. Comput Aided Des 37:941–955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Leibrecht S, van Pham T, Anderl R (2004) Techniques for the integration of expert knowledge into the development of environmentally sound products. J Eng Des 15:353–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lohtander M, Varis J (2007) Manufacturing features in cutting shapes and punching holes in sheet metal. In: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on production research, Valparaiso, ChileGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ma YS, Bong CH (2010) Fine grain associative feature reasoning in collaborative engineering. Int J Comp Appl Technol 37:210–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ma YS, Hadi Q (2012) Unified feature based approach for process system design. Int J Comp Integr Manuf 25:263–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ma YS, Tong T (2003) Associative feature modeling for concurrent engineering integration. Comput Ind 51:51–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ma YS, Chen G, Thimm G (2008) Paradigm shift: unified and associative feature-based concurrent and collaborative engineering. J Intell Manuf 19:626–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Marion TJ, Simpson T (2009) New product development practice application to an early-stage firm. Des Stud 30:256–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Marion TJ, Friar JH, Simpson TW (2012) New product development practices and early-stage firms: two in-depth case studies. J Prod Innov Manag 29:639–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    McCarthy IP, Tsinopoulos C, Allen P, Rose-Anderssen C (2006) New product development as a complex adaptive system of decisions. J Prod Innov Manag 23:437–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Melton T (2005) The benefits of lean manufacturing—what lean thinking has to offer the process industries. Trans IChemE Part A, Chem Eng Res Des 83:662–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Morbach J, Yang A, Marquardt W (2007) OntoCAPE: a large-scale ontology for chemical process engineering. Eng Appl Artif Intell 20:147–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nagy RL, Ullman DG, Dietterich TG (1992) A data representation for collaborative mechanical design. Res Eng Des 3:233–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nasab HH, Bioki TA, Zare HK (2012) Finding a probabilistic approach to analyze lean manufacturing. J Clean Prod 29–30:73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ohno T (1988) Toyota production system. Productivity Press, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Park J, Yang S (2008) Collaborative engineering and product quality assurance based on integrated engineering information management. In: Proceedings of international conference on smart manufacturing applicationGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ramaraj E, Duraisamy S (2007) Design optimization metrics for UML based object-oriented systems. Int J Softw Eng Knowl Eng 17:423–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Renner A (2001) XML data and object databases: a perfect couple. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on data engineering, IEEE, Heidelberg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
  42. 42.
    Sohlenius G (1992) Concurrent engineering. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 41:645–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Stage-Gate (2012) Measuring and improving product development performance and practices. http://www.stage-gate.eu/article-how-to-measure-innovation.asp. Accessed 18 Nov 2012
  44. 44.
    STEP application handbook ISO 10303 Version 3. 30 Jun 2006Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sun Microsystem Inc. (2012) Java shared data toolkit API 2.0. http://java.sun.com/products/java-media/jsdt/. Accessed 28 Aug 2012
  46. 46.
    Thimm G, Lee SG, Ma YS (2006) Towards unified modeling of product life-cycles. Comput Ind 57:331–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Thomas S (2001) Managing quality: an integrative approach. Prentice Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Tornincasa S, Di Monaco F (2010) The future and the evolution of CAD. In: Proceedings of 14th international research/expert conference: trends in the development of machinery and associated technologyGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ulrich K, Eppinger S (2011) Product design and development. http://www.ulrich-eppinger.net/
  50. 50.
    Vranic V (2004) Reconciling feature modeling: a feature modeling metamodel. In: Proceedings of net object days, pp. 122–137Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wang H, Xiang D, Duan G et al (2007) Assembly planning based on semantic modeling approach. Comput Ind 58:227–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wang J, Tang MX (2007) Product data modeling for design collaboration. In: Proceedings of 11th international conference on computer supported cooperative work in designGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wang Q, Ren Z (2010) XML-based data processing in network supported collaborative design. Int J Autom Comput 7:330–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Westphal CR, Blaxton T (1998) Data mining solutions: methods and tools for solving real-world problems. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Wiesner A, Morbach J, Marquardt W (2011) Information integration in chemical process engineering based on semantic technologies. Comput Chem Eng 35:692–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Womack JP, Jones DT, Roos D (1990) The machine that changed the world. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Womack JP, Daniel TJ (2003) Lean thinking. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Yeo KT, Ning JH (2002) Integrating supply chain and critical chain concepts in engineer-procure-construct (EPC) projects. Int J Proj Manag 20:253–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    You CF, Tsou PJ, Yeh SC (2007) Collaborative design for an assembly via the internet. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 31:1217–1222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Zhang L (2009) Modelling process platforms based on an object-oriented visual diagrammatic modeling language. Int J Prod Res 47:4413–4435CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Narges Sajadfar
    • 1
  • Yanan Xie
    • 1
  • Hongyi Liu
    • 1
  • Y.-S. Ma
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations