Advertisement

New Insights from the BIOKENAF Project

Chapter
Part of the Green Energy and Technology book series (GREEN)

Abstract

This chapter summarizes the most important achievements of the European research project entitled “BIOKENAF—Biomass Production Chain and Growth Simulation Model for Kenaf” (www.cres.gr/biokenaf) that carried out for 2003–2007. The overall objective of the BIOKENAF project was to introduce and evaluate kenaf as a non-food crop through an integrated approach for alternative land use in South EU that will provide diversified opportunities for farmers and biological materials for the “bio-based industries” of the future. Several fields’ trials were carried out in South EU aiming to identify the appropriate crop management for yields maximization (sowing dates, plant densities, best varieties, irrigation and fertilization needs, harvesting time). A dynamic crop-growth simulation model was developed to produce quantitative estimates of the yielding potential of kenaf at regional level. The model was based on the detailed crop data that were collected from the field trials and were included in photosynthetic capacity, respiratory losses, phenology, dry matter distribution, and data on leaf area. The appropriate harvesting time for south EU countries that ensure the highest possible yields with the lowest possible moisture content investigated as well as best storage method in order to the minimum losses in the quality and quantity of the feedstock to be achieved. The suitability of kenaf for both selected industrial products (composites, building materials, nonwovens, paper, and board and absorption particles) and for thermo-chemical energy applications (combustion, gasification, and pyrolysis) was investigated. Following an environmental/economic assessment and market studies insight in the feasibility of kenaf for industrial and energy applications was provided that was used not only for comparison of the crop with other conventional crops with similar cultural practices but also for the development of scenarios for alternative land use and diversified opportunities for farmers in order to produce industrial bio-products that will supply the “bio-based industries” of the future.

Keywords

BIOKENAF project Kenaf Hibiscus cannabinus L Kenaf adaptation Productivity Varieties Irrigation Nitrogen Sowing dates Plant populations Growth simulation model Harvesting Storage Industrial applications Insulation mats Composites Absorption materials Ash behavior Ash melting point Combustion Gasification Pyrolysis Environmental impact assessment Life cycle analysis Economic analysis Market opportunities 

References

  1. Ardente F, Beccali M, Cellura M, Mistretta M (2008) Building energy performance: A LCA case study of kenaf-fibres insulation board. Energy Build 40:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Campbell TA, O’Brien MJ (1981) Differential response of Kenaf to gray mold. Crop Sci 21:88–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cheng Z (2001) Kenaf research, products and applications in Japan. Plant Fibers Prod 23(3):16–24 in ChineseGoogle Scholar
  4. Cherubini F, Bird ND, Cowie A, Jungmeier G, Schlamadinger B, Woess-Gallasch S (2009) Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: Key issues, ranges and recommendations. Resour Conserv Recycl 53:434–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Correia FM (2011) Balanço energético da utilização de kenaf na produção de energia e painéis isoladores, em Portugal. Mestrado em Energia e Bioenergia, FCT/UNL, Lisbon Google Scholar
  6. Danalatos NG, Archontoulis SV (2010) Growth and biomass productivity of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus, L.) under different agricultural inputs and management practices in central Greece. Ind Crops Prod 32:231–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dempsey JM (1975) Fiber crops. The University Press of Florida, Gainesville, p 457Google Scholar
  8. FAO (2003) Consultation on natural fibers, the production and consumption of kenaf in China. ESC-Fibers Consultation no: 03/6Google Scholar
  9. FAO (2010) World production of jute, kenaf and allied fibresGoogle Scholar
  10. Fernando A, Duarte MP, Mendes B (2009) Is kenaf a sustainable land-use alternative for greenhouse gas emission mitigation in the Mediterranean region? In: De Santi GF, Dallemand JF, Ossenbrink H, Grassi A, Helm P (eds) Proceedings of the 17th European biomass conference and exhibition, from research to industry and markets, pp 2549–2552Google Scholar
  11. Fernando A, Morais J, Mendes B, Oliveira JFS (2008) Is kenaf an effective land-use alternative for the energy and industrial sectors in Portugal? In: Proceedings of the international conference: bioenergy: challenges and opportunities, pp 237–242Google Scholar
  12. Manzanares M, Tenorio JL, Manzanares P, Ayebre L (1993) Yield and development of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) crop in relation to water supply and intercepted radiation. Biomass Bioenergy 5(5):337–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mazumder BB (2000) A combination treatment of kenaf bast fiber for high viscosity pulp. J Wood Sci 46:364–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McGregor SE (1976) Small fruits and brambles. In: Insect pollination of cultivated crop plants. http://gears.tucson.ars.ag.gov/book
  15. Nelson GH, Nieschlag HJ, Wolff IA (1962) A research for new fiber crops, V. Pulping studies on kenaf. TAPPI 45(10):780–786Google Scholar
  16. Paschalidis ChD, Stavrinos EA, Mitsios JK, Christidou SV (1997) The effect of nitrogen uptake and utilization on the growth and the yield characteristics of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus, Malvaceae) in Entisols. Bul J Agric Sci 3:411–418Google Scholar
  17. Patane C, Cosentino SL (2010) Effects of soil water deficit on yield and quality of processing tomato under a Mediterranean climate. Agric Water Manage. 97:131–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sortino O, Patanè C, D’Agosta G, Cosentino SL (2005) Effect of sowing time on seed production of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus) in Sicily. In: Proceedings of the 14th biomass conference, Paris, France, pp 145–148Google Scholar
  19. Venturi G (1990) II kenaf, Hibiscus cannabinus, “nuova” coltura alternativa? L’Informatore Agrario 46(25):5–8Google Scholar
  20. Venturi G, Monti A (2005) Energia da colture dedicate: aspetti ambientali ed agronomici. Conferenza Nazionale sulla Politica Energetica in ItaliaGoogle Scholar
  21. Webber III CL (1993) Yield components of five kenaf cultivars. In Agron J 85:533–535Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Renewable Energy Sources and Saving, CRESAthensGreece
  2. 2.Department of Agronomy and Animal ProductionUniversity of CataniaCataniaItaly
  3. 3.Department of Crop ProductionUniversity of ThessalyThessalyGreece
  4. 4.Centro di Ecologia Teorica ed Applicata, CETAGoriziaItaly
  5. 5.Wageningen-URAgrotechnology and Food Sciences GroupWageningenThe Netherlands
  6. 6.Biomass Technology Group BV, BTGEnschedeThe Netherlands
  7. 7.Departamento de Ciências e Tecnologia da BiomassaUniversidade Nova de LisboaLisboaPortugal
  8. 8.Department of Agricultural SciencesUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly
  9. 9.Institute Nacional de Investigacion y Technologia Agraria y Alimentaria, INIAMadridSpain
  10. 10.National Agricultural Research FoundationKomotini Research StationKomotiniGreece
  11. 11.INRAEnvironment and Arable Crops Research UnitThiverval-GrignonFrance
  12. 12.ADAS LTdWolverhamptonUK

Personalised recommendations