Skip to main content

Performance Standardization for Sustainability in Complex Production Networks: A Roadmap

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Engineering Asset Management 2011

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Abstract

Sustainability has attracted the attention of many researchers and organizations. There is a Europe-wide interest in measuring sustainability performance. A standardized framework to determine sustainability performance of dispersed production clusters, however, has yet to be found. Existing initiatives either focus on partial aspects of sustainability or do not support sustainability considerations for complex value networks but rather focus on the organizational level. This paper discusses some problems related to existing initiatives and introduces SustainValue, a project that responds to the known shortcomings and that aims at the creation of a governing framework for sustainability performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Seiffert MEB, Loch C (2005) Systemic thinking in environmental management: support for sustainable development. J Cleaner Prod 13(12):1197–1202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bretzke WR (2010) Der schwierige Weg zu einer nachhaltigen Logistik. Logistik für Unternehmen (10/2010), p 3

    Google Scholar 

  3. SustainValue Consortium (2010) Proposal for a collaborative project: SustainValue

    Google Scholar 

  4. European Commission (2009) Work programme 2010—nanoscience, nanotechnologies, materials and new production technologies (NMP). Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/page/cooperation?callIdentifier=FP7-NMP-2010-SMALL-4. Cited 11 Aug 2011

  5. Shuaib M, Metta H, Lu T, Badurdeen F, Jawahir IS, Goldsby T (2011) Design and performance evaluation of sustainable supply chains: approach and methodologies. In: Seliger G, Khraisheh MM, Jawahir I (eds) Advances in sustainable manufacturing. Springer, Berlin, pp 347–352

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Porter ME, van der Linde C (1995) Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. Harvard Bus Rev 73(5):120–134 (Sept–Oct)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Supplier Business Ltd (2009) Supplying Daimler http://www.supplierbusiness.com/shop/products/21/supplying-the-oems

  8. Porter ME (1985) Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Urban G (2007) Das ganze Zuliefernetzwerk im Griff—Innovations- und Effizienzpotenziale nutzen. Von der Zulieferkette zum Zuliefernetzwerk. In: Logistik in der Automobilindustrie. Innovatives Supply Chain Management für wettbewerbsfähige Zulieferstrukturen; mit 6 Tabellen. Springer, Berlin. pp 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strateg Manag J 5(2):171–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liyanage JP (2003) Operations and maintenance performance in oil and gas production assets: theoretical architecture and capital value theory perspective. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Science and Technology, Norway

    Google Scholar 

  13. OECD (2009) Overview of the OECD sustainable manufacturing Toolkit prototype. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/34/25/44280332.pdf. Cited 3 Aug 2011

  14. Veleva V, Hart M, Greiner T, Crumbley C (2001) Indicators for sustainable production. J Cleaner Prod 9(5):447–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rabe M, Jochem R, Weinaug H (2011) Multi-perspective modelling of sustainability aspects within the industrial environment and their implication on the simulation technique. In: Seliger G, Khraisheh MM, Jawahir I (eds) Advances in sustainable manufacturing. Springer, Berlin, pp 315–320

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. International Energy Agency (2009) Transport, energy and CO2. Moving toward sustainability. OECD Publishing, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  17. European Commission (2010) International reference life cycle data system (ILCD) handbook: general guide for life cycle assessment—detailed guidance. 1st edn. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  18. Trusty W (2010) Misconceptions and misunderstanding about LCA. Athena Sustainable Materials Institute, Merrickville

    Google Scholar 

  19. Koho M, Nylund H, Arha T, Torvinen S (2011) Towards manufacturing system sustainability assessment: an initial tool and development plans. In: Seliger G, Khraisheh MM, Jawahir I (eds) Advances in sustainable manufacturing. Springer, Berlin, pp 309–314

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Feng S, Joung C (2010) An overview of a proposed measurement infrastructure for sustainable manufacturing. In: Proceedings of the 7th global conference on sustainable manufacturing. Chennai, 2–4 Dec 2009

    Google Scholar 

  21. Reinhard F (1999) Bringing the environment down to Earth. Harvard Bus Rev 77(4):149–157

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hillary R (2004) Environmental management systems and the smaller enterprise. J Cleaner Prod 12(6):561–569

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Murillo-Luna JL, Garcés-Ayerbe C, Rivera-Torres P (2011) Barriers to the adoption of proactive environmental strategies. J Cleaner Prod 19(13):1417–1425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bunse K, Vodicka M, Schönsleben P, Brülhart M, Ernst FO (2011) Integrating energy efficiency performance in production management—gap analysis between industrial needs and scientific literature. J Cleaner Prod 19(6–7):667–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. López MV, Garcia A, Rodriguez L (2007) Sustainable development and corporate performance: a study based on the Dow Jones sustainability index. J Bus Ethics 75(3):285–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. European Commission (2011) Key figures in European business with a special feature on SMEs http://bookshop.europa.eu/en/key-figures-on-european-business-with-a-special-feature-on-smes-pbKSET11001/

  27. Lydenberg S, Rogers J, Wood D (2010) From transparency to performance: a new method for industry-based sustainability reporting on key issues. Initiative for Responsible Investment at Harvard University. Available from: http://hausercenter.org/iri/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/IRI_Transparency-to-Performance.pdf. Cited 23 Aug 2011

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. E. Beer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Beer, J.E., Liyanage, J.P. (2014). Performance Standardization for Sustainability in Complex Production Networks: A Roadmap. In: Lee, J., Ni, J., Sarangapani, J., Mathew, J. (eds) Engineering Asset Management 2011. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4993-4_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4993-4_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4992-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4993-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics