Skip to main content

The PC Trial: An Effective Treatment Not Demonstrating Effective Power

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Patent Foramen Ovale

Abstract

The patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic embolism (PC) trial was designed in 1999 as the first randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of percutaneous device closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) with medical treatment in preventing recurrent events among patients with cryptogenic embolism. The PC Trial is an investigator initiated trial which originally sought to include any commercially available device in the closure group, but soon came to the conclusion, that device related differences may affect their individual performance regarding closure rates and thrombus formation and hence the clinical outcome. Therefore the purpose of the study was modified to comparing the efficacy of percutaneous PFO closure using one device only, the Amplatzer PFO Occluder (previously AGA Medical Corporation, Golden Valley, MN, USA, currently St. Jude Medical Corporation, Plymouth, MN, USA), with medical treatment in patients with presumed paradoxical embolism in a prospective, randomized trial. Accordingly, the device manufacturer sponsored the study by an unrestricted educational grant, with no involvement in study design, conduct, or publication. The study results were published in the March 21, 2013 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Khattab AA, Windecker S, Juni P, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) using the Amplatzer PFO Occluder with medical treatment in patients with cryptogenic embolism (PC-Trial): rationale and design. Trials. 2011;12:56.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lechat P, Mas JL, Lascault G, Loron P, Theard M, Klimczac M, Drobinski G, Thomas D, Grosgogeat Y. Prevalence of patent foramen ovale in patients with stroke. N Engl J Med. 1988;318:1148–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lechat P, Lascault G, Mas JL, Loron P, Klimczac K, Guggiari M, Drobinski G, Fraysse JB, Thomas D, Grosgogeat Y. Prevalence of patent foramen ovale in young patients with ischemic cerebral complications. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1989;82:847–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Webster MW, Chancellor AM, Smith HJ, Swift DL, Sharpe DN, Bass NM, Glasgow GL. Patent foramen ovale in young stroke patients. Lancet. 1988;2:11–112.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hausmann D, Mugge A, Becht I, Daniel WG. Diagnosis of patent foramen ovale by transesophageal echocardiography and association with cerebral and peripheral embolic events. Am J Cardiol. 1992;70:668–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bogousslavsky J, Garazi S, Jeanrenaud X, Aebischer N, Van Melle G. Stroke recurrence in patients with patent foramen ovale: the Lausanne Study. Lausanne Stroke with Paradoxal Embolism Study Group. Neurology. 1996;46:1301–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Devuyst G, Bogousslavsky J, Ruchat P, et al. Prognosis after stroke followed by surgical closure of patent foramen ovale: a prospective follow-up study with brain MRI and simultaneous transesophageal and transcranial Doppler ultrasound. Neurology. 1996;47:1162–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wahl A, Juni P, Mono ML, et al. Long-term propensity score-matched comparison of percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale with medical treatment after paradoxical embolism. Circulation. 2012;125:803–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schuchlenz HW, Weihs W, Berghold A, Lechner A, Schmidt R. Secondary prevention after cryptogenic cerebrovascular events in patients with patent foramen ovale. Int J Cardiol. 2005;101:77–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Alsheikh-Ali AA, Thaler DE, Kent DM. Patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic stroke: incidental or pathogenic? Stroke. 2009;40:2349–55.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Agarwal S, Bajaj NS, Kumbhani DJ, Tuzcu EM, Kapadia SR. Meta-analysis of transcatheter closure versus medical therapy for patent foramen ovale in prevention of recurrent neurological events after presumed paradoxical embolism. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2012;5:777–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kutty S, Sengupta PP, Khandheria BK. Patent foramen ovale: the known and the to be known. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:1665–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Meier B, Kalesan B, Mattle HP, Khattab AA, Hildick-Smith D, Dudek D, Andersen G, Ibrahim R, Schuler G, Walton AS, Wahl A, Windecker S, Jüni P. Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic embolism. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1083–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Carroll JD, Saver JL, Thaler DE, Smalling RW, Berry S, MacDonald LA, Marks DS, Tirschwell DL. Closure of patent foramen ovale versus medical therapy after cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1092–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wahl A, Tai T, Praz F, et al. Late results after percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale for secondary prevention of paradoxical embolism using the Amplatzer PFO occluder without intraprocedural echocardiography: effect of device size. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2:116–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Furlan AJ, Reisman M, Massaro J, et al. Closure or medical therapy for cryptogenic stroke with patent foramen ovale. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:991–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Konstantinides S, Geibel A, Kasper W, Olschewski M, Blumel L, Just H. Patent foramen ovale is an important predictor of adverse outcome in patients with major pulmonary embolism. Circulation. 1998;97:1946–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Clergeau MR, Hamon M, Morello R, Saloux E, Viader F. Silent cerebral infarcts in patients with pulmonary embolism and a patent foramen ovale: a prospective diffusion-weighted MRI study. Stroke. 2009;40:3758–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sorensen HT, Horvath-Puho E, Pedersen L, Baron JA, Prandoni P. Venous thromboembolism and subsequent hospitalisation due to acute arterial cardiovascular events: a 20-year cohort study. Lancet. 2007;370:1773–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hagen PT, Scholz DG, Edwards WD. Incidence and size of patent foramen ovale during the first 10 decades of life: an autopsy study of 965 normal hearts. Mayo Clin Proc. 1984;59:17–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernhard Meier MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Khattab, A.A., Meier, B. (2015). The PC Trial: An Effective Treatment Not Demonstrating Effective Power. In: Amin, Z., Tobis, J., Sievert, H., Carroll, J. (eds) Patent Foramen Ovale. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4987-3_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4987-3_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4986-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4987-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics