Skip to main content

Device Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale or Medical Therapy for Cryptogenic Stroke: The CLOSURE I Trial

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Patent Foramen Ovale

Abstract

CLOSURE I was the first randomized clinical trial that investigated the use of medical therapy versus medical therapy combined with transcatheter patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure, for the treatment of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). The study included patients between the ages of 18 and 60 who were diagnosed with a cryptogenic stroke or TIA with evidence of a PFO by transesophageal echo. Patients with other identifiable causes for ischemic stroke or TIA, such as carotid artery stenosis, complex aortic arch atheroma, significant left ventricular dysfunction or aneurysm, or atrial fibrillation were excluded. The justification for performing this trial was that observational studies in patients who had suffered a cryptogenic stroke and underwent PFO closure, appeared to have a much lower recurrence rate of stroke compared to patients remained on medical therapy without PFO closure 909 patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either percutaneous PFO closure with the STARFlex Septal Occluder plus antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel, or medical therapy alone with aspirin, warfarin or a combination of both. The primary endpoint was stroke and/or TIA, all-cause mortality within the first 30 days, and death from a neurological cause occurring between 31 days and 2 years. Secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality, stroke, TIA, significant bleeding, and other transient neurologic events of undetermined etiology. After a 2-year follow up, there were no statistical differences in the primary and secondary outcomes when comparing the Closure group versus the Medical Therapy group in both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. The study was heavily criticized for its use of a suboptimal device that resulted in incomplete PFO closure in a large fraction of patients, as well as an increased risk of atrial fibrillation and thrombogenesis compared to the Medical Therapy group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Furlan AJ, Reisman M, Massaro J, et al. Closure or medical therapy for cryptogenic stroke with patent foramen ovale. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(11):991–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Windecker S, Wahl A, Nedeltchev K, Arnold M, Schwerzmann M, Seiler C, Mattle HP, Meier B. Comparison of medical treatment with percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale in patients with cryptogenic stroke. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(4):750–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Thanopoulos BV, Dardas PD, Karanasios E, Mezilis N. Transcatheter closure versus medical therapy of patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006;68(5):741–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dowson A, Mullen MJ, Peatfield R, et al. Migraine intervention with STARFlex technology (MIST) trial: a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, sham-controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of patent foramen ovale closure with STARFlex septal repair implant to resolve refractory migraine headache. Circulation. 2008;117:1397–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gornall J. Medical research: a very public break-up. BMJ. 2010;340:180–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Van den Branden BJ, Luermans JG, Post MC, Plokker HW, Ten Berg JM, Suttorp MJ. The BioStar(r) device versus the CardioSEAL(r) device in patent foramen ovale closure: comparison of mid-term efficacy and safety. EuroIntervention. 2010;6:498–504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. van de Wyngaert F, Kefer J, Hermans C, et al. Absence of recurrent stroke after percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale despite residual right-to-left cardiac shunt assessed by transcranial Doppler. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2008;101(7–8):435–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Staubach S, Steinberg DH, Zimmermann W, Wawra N, Wilson N, Wunderlich N, Sievert H. New onset atrial fibrillation after patent foramen ovale closure. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;74(6):889–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hornung M, Bertog SC, Franke J, Id D, Taaffe M, Wunderlich N, Vaskelyte L, Hofmann I, Sievert H. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing three different devices for percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(43):3362–9. [Epub ahead of print].

    Google Scholar 

  10. Anzai H, Child J, Natterson B, Krivokapich J, Fishbein MC, Chan VK, Tobis JM. Incidence of thrombus formation on the CardioSEAL and the Amplatzer interatrial closure devices. Am J Cardiol. 2004;93(4):426–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Thaler DE, Wahl A. Critique of closure or medical therapy for cryptogenic stroke with patent foramen ovale: the hole truth? Stroke. 2012;43(11):3147–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gladstone DJ, Spring M, Dorian P et al. Atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(26):2467–77.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan M. Tobis MD, FACC .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mojadidi, M.K., Gevorgyan, R., Tobis, J.M. (2015). Device Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale or Medical Therapy for Cryptogenic Stroke: The CLOSURE I Trial. In: Amin, Z., Tobis, J., Sievert, H., Carroll, J. (eds) Patent Foramen Ovale. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4987-3_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4987-3_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4986-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4987-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics