Skip to main content

Interaction Between Emotions and Mental Models in Engineering and Design Activities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Emotional Engineering vol. 2

Abstract

The objective of this chapter is to describe the interaction between emotions and the preservation of ideas in engineering and design activities. Johnson-Laird’s mental model construct of internal representations is utilized to define cognitive resistance. A description of the interaction between emotions and cognitive resistance is presented. A value function that forecasts a subject’s behavior when confronted with stimuli that are contradictory to his mental model is derived from a reinforcement learning framework. An experimental study has been conducted to validate the theory. The relevant results, confirming the predictions of the value function, are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Meaning that the model only makes sense as a whole; the constituent parts are unimportant and not easily accessible.

  2. 2.

    In the meaning of “functional for survival”.

  3. 3.

    An analogous analysis is warranted in the context of continuous time.

  4. 4.

    In real life, contradictory stimuli may—and often do—extinguish, of course.

  5. 5.

    An important assumption is that all of the relevant history of the environment is represented in each state signal, so that these have Markov properties, and the reinforcement learning framework represents a Markov decision process.

  6. 6.

    This simplification allows us to disregard the non-contradictory stimuli that are usually interspaced between the contradictory stimuli and is allowable for the qualitative discussion in this section.

  7. 7.

    Following [48], we use the term “value function” to denote the expected future rewards if the agent follows a particular set of consecutive actions (a so-called policy).

  8. 8.

    Joy will be used as the general term to describe the positively valenced emotions in this chapter.

  9. 9.

    That is, “to broaden thought-action repertoires and lead to actions that build enduring personal resources” [54].

References

  1. Damasio AR (1994) Descarte’s error: emotion, reason and the human brain. New York, Grosset/Putnam

    Google Scholar 

  2. Johnson-Laird PN (2006b) Mental models, sentential reasoning, and illusory inferences. Adv Psychol, pp 27–51

    Google Scholar 

  3. Miller GA (1956) The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev 63:81–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Newell A, Simon HA (1972) Human problem solving. Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boos M (2007) Optimal sharedness of mental models for effective group performance. CoDesign 3:21–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nokes TJ, Schunn CD, Chi MTH (2010) Problem solving and human expertise. In: Peterson P, Baker EL, McGaw B (eds) International encyclopedia of education. Elsevier, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  7. Badke-Schaub P, Neumann A, Lauche K, Mohammed S (2007) Mental models in design teams: a valid approach to performance in design collaboration? CoDesign 3:5–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Higgins ET (2000) Social cognition: learning about what matters in the social world. Eur J Soc Psychol 30:3–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dörner D (1999) Bauplan für eine Seele. Rowohlt Verlag GmbH, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rasmussen J, Vicente KJ (1989) Coping with human errors through system design: implications for ecological interface design. Int J Man Mach Stud 31:517–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wickens CD, Hollands JG (2000) Engineering psychology and human performance. Prentice Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Woods DD, Dekker S, Johannesen LJ, Cook RI, Sarter N (2010) Behind human error. Ashgate

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dörner D (1997) The logic of failure: recognizing and avoiding error in complex situations

    Google Scholar 

  14. Johnson-Laird PN (2006) How we reason. Oxford University Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schraagen JM (2009) Macht en onmacht der gewoonte (The power and weakness of habits). Universiteit Twente, Enschede

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stempfle J, Badke-Schaub P (2002) Thinking in design teams: an analysis of team communication. Des Stud 23:473–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Besnard D, Greathead D, Baxter G (2004) When mental models go wrong: co-occurrences in dynamic, critical systems. Int J Hum Comput Stud 60:117–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cardoso C, Badke-Schaub P, Luz A (2009) Design fixation on non-verbal stimuli: the influence of simple vs rich pictorial information on design problem solving. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2009 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference. San Diego, California

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dijksterhuis A, Nordgren LF (2006) A theory of unconscious thought. Perspectives Psychol Sci 1:95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bargh JA, Chartrand TL (1999) The unbearable automaticity of being. Am Psychol 54:462–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Johnson-Laird PN (2010) Mental models and human reasoning. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:18243–18250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schön DA (1983) The reflective practitioner. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schön DA (1992) Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation. Knowl Based Syst 5:3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Akin C (2008) Frames of reference in architectural design: analyzing the hyper-acclamation (A-h-a-!). Carnegie Mellon University

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kleinsmann M (2006) Understanding collaborative design. School of Industrial Design Engineering. Delft University of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tuckman BW, Jensen MAC (1977) Stages of small-group development revisited. Group Organ Manage 2:419–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Badke-Schaub P, Goldschmidt G, Meijer M (2010) How does cognitive conflict in design teams support the development of creative ideas? Creativity Innovation Manage 19:119–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mandler G (1984) Mind and body: Psychology of emotion and stress. WW Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bechara A, Damasio AR (2005) The somatic marker hypothesis: a neural theory of economic decision. Games Econ Behav 52:336–372

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Bechara A, Damasio H, Damasio AR (2000) Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cereb Cortex 10:295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Johnson-Laird PN, Oatley K (2008) Emotions, music and literature. In: Lewis M, Haviland-Jones JM, Feldman Barrett L (eds) Handbook of emotions, 3rd edn. The Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  32. Oatley K, Johnson-Laird PN (1996) The communicative theory of emotions: empirical tests, mental models, and implications for social interaction. In: Martin LL, Tesser A (eds) Striving and feeling: interactions among goals, affect, and self-regulation. Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  33. Stanovich KE, West RF (2000) Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate? Behav Brain Sci 23:645–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. de Neys W, Franssens S (2009) Belief inhibition during thinking: not always winning but at least taking part. Cognition 113:45–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pessoa L, Japee S, Sturman D, Ungerleider LG (2006) Target visibility and visual awareness modulate amygdala responses to fearful faces. Cereb Cortex 16:366–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Baumeister RF, Masicampo EJ (2010) Conscious thought is for facilitating social and cultural interactions: How mental simulations serve the Animal-Culture interface. Psychol Rev 117:945–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Baumeister RF, Vohs KD, Nathan Dewall C (2007) How emotion shapes behavior: feedback, anticipation, and reflection, rather than direct causation. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 11:167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tooby J, Cosmides L (2008) The evolutionary psychology of the emotions and their relationship to internal regulatory variables. In: Lewis M, Haviland-Jones JM, Feldman Barrett L (eds) Handbook of emotions, 3rd edn. The Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  39. Turner JH (2000) On the origins of human emotions: a sociological inquiry into the evolution of human affect. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  40. Rolls ET (2007) Emotion elicited by primary reinforcers and following stimulus-reinforcement association learning. In: Coan JA, Allen JJB (eds) Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment. Oxford University Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  41. Darwin C (1872) The expression of emotion in man and animals

    Google Scholar 

  42. Frijda NH (2008) The Psychologist’s point of view. In: Lewis M, Haviland-Jones JM, Feldman Barrett L (eds) Handbook of emotions, 3rd edn. The Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  43. Oatley K (2007) On the definition and function of emotions. Soc Sci Inf, 46

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hrdy SB (2007) Evolutionary context of human development: the cooperative breeding model. In: Salmon C, Shackelford TK (eds) Family relationships: an evolutionary perspective. Oxford University Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  45. Fischer AH, Manstead ASR (2008) Social functions of emotion. In: Lewis M, Haviland-Jones JM, Feldman Barrett L (eds) Handbook of emotions, 3rd edn. The Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  46. Gross JJ (2008) Emotion regulation. In: Lewis M, Haviland-Jones JM, Feldman Barrett L (eds) Handbook of Emotions, 3rd edn. The Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  47. Flach JM, Dekker S, Stappers PJ (2008) Playing twenty questions with nature: reflections on quantum mechanics and cognitive systems. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 9:125–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Sutton RS, Barto AG (1998) Reinforcement learning, MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  49. Holroyd CB, Coles MG (2002) The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the errorrelated negativity. Psychological review, 109(4):679

    Google Scholar 

  50. O'Doherty JP, Dayan P, Friston K, Critchley H, Dolan RJ (2003) Temporal difference models and reward-related learning in the human brain. Neuron, 38(2):329

    Google Scholar 

  51. Wickens A (2009) Introduction to Biopsychology. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ortony A, Clore GL, Collins A (1988) The cognitive structure of emotions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  53. ISEN, A. M. (2008) Some Ways in Which Positive Affect Influences Decision Making and Problem Solving. IN LEWIS, M., HAVILAND-JONES, J. M. & FELDMAN BARRETT, L. (Eds.) Handbook of Emotions. Third ed. New York, The Guilford Press

    Google Scholar 

  54. Fredrickson BL, Cohn MA (2008) Positive emotions. In: Lewis M, Haviland-Jones JM, Feldman Barrett L (eds) Handbook of emotions, 3rd edn. The Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  55. Frijda NH (2007) The laws of emotion. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  56. Lewis MD (2008b) The emergence of human emotions. In: Lewis M, Haviland-Jones JM, Feldman Barrett L (eds) Handbook of emotions, 3rd edn. The Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  57. Lemerise EA, Dodge KA (2008) The development of anger and hostile interactions. In: Lewis M, Haviland-Jones JM, Barrett LF (eds) Handbook of emotions, 3rd edn. The Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  58. Lewis MD (2008a) Self-conscious emotions: embarrassment, prode, shame and guilt. In: Lewis M, Haviland-Jones JM, Feldman Barrett L (Eds.) Handbook of emotions, 3rd edn. The Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  59. de Boer RJ (2012) Seneca’s error: an affective model of cognitive resilience Industrial Design Engineering. Delft University of Technology, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  60. Wagner U, Gais S, Haider H, Verleger R, Born J (2004) Sleep inspires insight. Nature 427:352–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert J. de Boer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Boer, R.J., Badke-Schaub, P. (2013). Interaction Between Emotions and Mental Models in Engineering and Design Activities. In: Fukuda, S. (eds) Emotional Engineering vol. 2. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4984-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4984-2_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4983-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4984-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics