Advertisement

Incentives in Organizations: Can Economics and Psychology Coexist in Human Resources Management?

  • Ugo MerloneEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Several disciplines have approached Human Resources Management (HRM) from different perspectives with several authors providing interesting contributions but often ignoring each other. In this chapter, I will illustrate how Economics and Psychology approach HRM in order to point out differences but also to areas of intersection between these two important disciplines. I will mainly concentrate on Economics and Psychology, not for the sake of some alleged priority or superiority of these disciplines, but rather for being more familiar with this literature. In the future research it would be interesting to add perspectives coming from other disciplines. Psychology and Economics, as social sciences, often deal with models of human behavior. It is well known that these two disciplines offer contrasting theories of human behavior on virtually every major point (DeAngelo et al. 2011). One strong point of disagreement is rationality (Smith 1991). We will see that the contrast on rationality is not limited to Economics and Psychology. Even if the differences between these two disciplines are often stark, they both agree on incompleteness of contracts. In this chapter, I will explore how these disciplines approach this gap, what are the main differences, and the possible integrations.

Keywords

Human Resource Management Procedural Justice Psychological Contract Employment Contract Contract Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. R.L. Ackoff, Science in the systems age: beyond IE, OR, and MS. Oper. Res. 21(3), 661–671 (1973)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. J.S. Adams, Inequity in social exchange, in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, ed. by L. Berkowitz (Academic Press, New York, 1965), pp. 276–299Google Scholar
  3. C. Argyris, Understanding Organizational Behavior (Dorsey Press, Homewood, 1960)Google Scholar
  4. O. Bandiera, I. Barankay, I. Rasul, Social preferences and the response to incentives: evidence from personnel data. Quart. J. Econ. 120(3), 917–962 (2005)Google Scholar
  5. J.N. Baron, D.M. Kreps, Strategic Human Resources (Wiley and Sons, New York, 1999)Google Scholar
  6. K. Binmore, Fun and Games. A Text on Game Theory (Heath and Co, Lexington, 1992)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. R. Birnbaum, The life cycle of academic management fads. J. High. Educ. 71(1), 1–16 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. P. Bolton, M. Dewatripont, Contract Theory (The MIT Press, Cambridge, 2005)Google Scholar
  9. J. Boudreau, W. Hopp, J.O. McClain, L.J. Thomas, On the interface between operations and human resources management. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 5(3), 179–202 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. C. Camerer, Behavioral economics: reunifying psychology and economics, in Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, vol. 96 (USA, 1999), pp. 10575–10577Google Scholar
  11. P.P. Carson, P.A. Lanier, K.D. Carson, B.N. Guidry, Clearing a path through the management fashion jungle: some preliminary trailblazing. Acad. Manag. J. 43(6), 1143–1158 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. G. Charness, M. Rabin, Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Quart. J. Econ. 117(3), 817–869 (2002)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. R.H. Coase, The nature of the firm. Economica 4(16), 386–405 (1937)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. H. Collins, Regulating the employment relationship for competitiveness. Indus. Law J. 30(1), 17–47 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. R. Cropanzano, M. Schminke, Using social justice to build effective work groups, in Groups at Work: Advances in Theory and Research, ed. by M. Turner (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, 2001), pp. 143–171Google Scholar
  16. R.L. Daft, R.A. Noe, Organizational Behavior (South-Western Publishing, Mason, 2001)Google Scholar
  17. G.J. DeAngelo, S. Beckman, L. Chen, J.W. Smith, X. Zhang, Microeconomics and psychology. SSRN, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1893788. Accessed 23 July 2011
  18. S. DellaVigna, Psychology and economics: evidence from the field. J. Econ. Lit. 47(2), 315–372 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. G. Divotti, U. Merlone, in Envy and Money Burning: Some Contradictory Evidence. Paper presented at the envy at work international symposium (Torino, Italy, 2011)Google Scholar
  20. E. Fehr, S. Gächter, Fairness and retaliation: the economics of reciprocity. J. Econ. Perspect. 14(3), 159–181 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. E. Fehr, O. Hart, C. Zehnder, Contracts, reference points, and competition-behavioral effects of the fundamental transformation. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 7(2–3), 561–572 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. E. Fehr, O. Hart, C. Zehnder, Contracts as reference points—experimental evidence. Am. Econ. Rev. 101, 493–525 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. T. Finholt, L.S. Sproull, Electronic groups at work. Organ. Sci. 1(1), 41–64 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. N. Foss, Bounded rationality in the economics of organization: present use and (some) future possibilities. J. Manage. Governance 5(3–4), 401–425 (2001)Google Scholar
  25. N. Foss, Bounded rationality in the economics of organization: much cited and little used. J. Econ. Psychol. 24(2), 245–264 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. S. Fox, P.E. Spector, D. Miles, Counterproductive work behavior (CWB) in response to job stressors and organizational justice: some mediator and moderator tests for autonomy and emotions. J. Vocat. Behav. 59(3), 291–309 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. X. Gabaix, D. Laibson, G. Moloche, S. Weinberg, Costly information acquisition: experimental analysis of a boundedly rational model. Am. Econ. Rev. 96(4), 1043–1068 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. J. Geanokoplos (2004), The Arrow-Debreau model of general equilibrium. (Cowles Foundation Paper 1090). Yale University, New-Haven, CT, http://cowles.econ.yale.edu/P/cp/p10b/p1090.pdf. Accessed 14 Feb 2012
  29. G. Gigerenzer, P.M. Todd, Fast and frugal heuristics, in Simple Heuristics that make us Smart, ed. by G. Gigerenzer, P.M. Todd, ABC Research Group (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999), pp. 3–34)Google Scholar
  30. S.J. Grossman, O.D. Hart, The costs and benefits of ownership: a theory of vertical and lateral integration. J. Polit. Econ. 94(4), 691–719 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. D.E. Guest, Human resources management and industrial relations. J. Manage. Stud. 24(5), 503–521 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. D.E. Guest, Is the psychological contract worth taking seriously? J. Organ. Behav. 19, 649–664 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. O.D. Hart, Is “bounded rationality” an important element of a theory of institutions? J. Inst. Theor. Econ. 146(4), 696–702 (1990)Google Scholar
  34. O.D. Hart, Firms contracts and financial structure (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. O.D. Hart, J. Moore, Incomplete contracts and renegotiation. Econometrica 56(4), 755–785 (1988)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. O.D. Hart, J. Moore, Foundations of incomplete contracts. Rev. Econ. Stud. 66(1), 115–138 (1999)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. O. D. Hart, J. Moore, Contracts as reference points. Q. J. Econ. CXXIII(1), 1–48 (2008)Google Scholar
  38. B. Holmström, J. Tirole, The theory of the firm, in Handbook of Industrial Organization, ed. by R. Schmalensee, R.D. Willig, vol. I (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1989), pp. 61–133Google Scholar
  39. B. Klein, R. Crawford, A. Alchian, Vertical integration appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting process. J. Law Econ. 21, 297–326 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. J.P. Kotter, The psychological contract. Calif. Manage. Rev. 15, 91–99 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. A.B. Krueger, A. Mas, Strikes, scabs, and tread separations: labor strife and the production of defective bridgestone/firestone tires. J. Polit. Econ. 112(2), 253–289 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. J.J. Laffont, D. Martimort, The Theory of Incentives (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2002)Google Scholar
  43. K. Legge, Human Resource Management. Rhetorics and Realities, Anniversary edn. (Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstioke, 2005)Google Scholar
  44. G.S. Leventhal, J. Karuza Jr., W.R. Fry, Beyond fairness: a theory of allocation preferences, in Justice and Social Interaction, ed. by G. Mikula. Experimentation and Theoretical Research from Psychological Research (Plenum, New York, 1980), pp. 167–218Google Scholar
  45. H. Levinson, Organizational Diagnosis (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1962)Google Scholar
  46. C.H. Loch, Y. Wu, Behavioral operations management. Found. Trends Technol. Inf. Oper. Manag. 1(3), 121–232 (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/0200000009
  47. G. Loewenstein, J.S Lerner, The role of affect in decision making. ed. by R. Davidson, H. Goldsmith, K. Scherer, Handbook of Affective Science. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), pp. 619–642Google Scholar
  48. M.S. Logan, Using agency theory to design successful outsourcing relationships. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 11(2), 21–32 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. I. Macho-Stadler, D. Pérez-Castrillo, An Introduction to the Economics of Information (Oxford University Press, New York, 1997)Google Scholar
  50. D. Marsden, The network economy and models of the employment contract. Br. J. Indus. Relat. 4(4), 659–684 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. A. Mas, Pay, reference points, and police performance. Quart. J. Econ. 121(3), 783–821 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. E. Maskin, J. Tirole, Unforeseen contingencies and incomplete contracts. Rev. Econ. Stud. 66, 83–114 (1999a)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. E. Maskin, J. Tirole, Two remarks on the property-right literature. Rev. Econ. Stud. 66, 139–149 (1999b)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. P.R. Milgrom, J. Roberts, Economics Organization and Management (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1992)Google Scholar
  55. R.H. Moorman, G.L. Blakely, B.P. Niehoff, Does perceived organizational support mediate the relationship between procedural justice and organizational citizenship behavior? Acad. Manag. J. 41(3), 351–357 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. S.P. Robbins, T.A. Judge, Organizational Behavior, 13th edn. (Pearson Education, London, 2009)Google Scholar
  57. M.V. Roehling, The origins and early development of the psychological contract construct. J. Manag. Hist Arch. 3(2), 204–217 (1997)Google Scholar
  58. D.M. Rousseau, Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Empl. Responsib. Rights J. 2(2), 121–139 (1989)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. D.M. Rousseau, The problem of psychological contract considered. J. Organ. Behav. 19, 665–671 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. D.M. Rousseau, The individual-organization relationship: the psychological contract, in APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, vol. 3, Maintaining, Expanding, and Contracting the Organization, ed. by S. Zedeck (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, 2010), pp. 191–210Google Scholar
  61. B. Salanie, The Economics of contracts. A Primer (The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1997)Google Scholar
  62. E.H. Schein, Organizational Psychology (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1965)Google Scholar
  63. R.G. Schroeder, Operations Management: Decision Making in the Operations Function, 4th edn. (McGraw-Hill, Singapore, 1993)Google Scholar
  64. I. Segal, Complexity and renegotiation: a foundation for incomplete contracts. Rev. Econ. Stud. 66(1), 57–82 (1999)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. H.A. Simon, A formal theory of the employment relationship. Econometrica 19(3), 293–305 (1951)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. H.A. Simon, Models of Man (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1957)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  67. H.A. Simon, Administrative Behavior, 4th edn. (Free Press, New York, 1997)Google Scholar
  68. F.J. Smith, Work attitudes as predictors of attendance on a specific day. J. Appl. Psychol. 62, 16–19 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. V.L. Smith, Review: rational choice: the contrast between economics and psychology. J. Polit. Econ. 99(4), 877–897 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. D.P. Skarlicki, R. Folger, Retaliation in the workplace: the roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. J. Appl. Psychol. 82(3), 434–443 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. J. Tirole, Bounded rationality and incomplete contracts (2007). University of Toulouse,. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.123.5630&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  72. J. Tirole, Cognition and incomplete contracts. Am. Econ. Rev. 99(1), 265–294 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. M.S. Viteles, Industrial Psychology (Norton, New York, 1932)Google Scholar
  74. O. Williamson, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (Free Press, New York, 1985)Google Scholar
  75. J. Zizzo, A.J. Oswald, Are people willing to pay to reduce others’ incomes? Annales d’Économie et de Statistique 63(64), 39–65 (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations