Study of Gender Feature in Computer Mediated Communication

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 219)

Abstract

Nowadays computer mediated communication (CMC) is rapidly turning our world into a global village. We are able to talk to each other in online chat rooms, mediated by nothing but computers. And we are increasingly seeing the benefit of the Internet which empowers women, who are considered less powerful in the traditional patterns of male-dominated communication, not only participate in the CMC “equally” but also find community to pursue their own interests. Thus, the Internet is said to eradicate gender prejudice in communication, leading to greater gender equality and gender became a lesser issue than it had been in previous times.

Keywords

Feature of gender Computer mediated communication Network 

References

  1. 1.
    Cherny L (1994) Gender differences in text-based virtual reality. In: Bucholtz M, Liang A, Sutton L, Hines C (eds) Cultural performances: proceedings of the third Berkeley Women and language conference, vol 67(5). Berkeley Women and Language Group, Berkeley, pp 78–79Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Coates J (1986) Women, men and language, vol 56(3). Longman, New York, pp 67–69Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Coates J (1986) Women talk: conversation between women friends. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Crystal D (2001) Language and the internet, vol 67(14). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 167–168Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Herring S, Johnson DA, DiBenedetto T (1993) Participation in electronic discourse in a “feminist” field. In: Bucholtz M, Hall K, Moonwomon B (eds) Locating power: proceedings of the second berkeley women and language conference, vol 16(9). Berkeley Women and Language Group, Berkeley, pp 250–262Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Herring S (2005) Gender and democracy in computer-mediated communication. Electron J Commun 133(2):45-47. http://www.cios.org/getfile/Herring_v3n293 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Herring S (2003) Gender and power in on-line communication. In: Hlomes J, Meyerhoff M (eds) The handbook of language and gender, vol 77(3). Blackwell, Oxford, pp 202–228Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Holmes J (1995) Women, men and politeness, vol 78(45). Longman, New York, 67–69Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lakoff R (1975) Language and woman’s place, vol 78(12). Harper and Row, New York, pp 56–58Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mills S (2003) Gender and politeness, vol 67(3). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–3Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mullany L (2004) Become the man that women desire: gender identity and dominant discourses in email advertising language. Lang Lit 13(8):291–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Spender D (1996) Nattering on the net: women, power and cyberspace, vol 56(8). Garamond Press, Toronto, pp 123–125Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tourism College of ZhejiangHangZhouChina

Personalised recommendations