Advertisement

S-Theta: low steering path-planning algorithm

  • Pablo Muñoz
  • María D. R-Moreno
Conference paper

Abstract

The path-planning problem for autonomous mobile robots has been addressed by classical search techniques such as A* or, more recently, Theta*. However, research usually focuses on reducing the length of the path or the processing time. Applying these advances to autonomous robots may result in the obtained “short” routes being less suitable for the robot locomotion subsystem. That is, in some types of exploration robots, the heading changes can be very costly (i.e. consume a lot of battery) and therefore may be beneficial to slightly increase the length of the path and decrease the number of turns (and thus reduce the battery consumption). In this paper we present a path-planning algorithm called S-Theta* that smoothes the turns of the path. This algorithm significantly reduces the heading changes, in both, indoors and outdoors problems as results show, making the algorithm especially suitable for robots whose ability to turn is limited or the associated cost is high.

Keywords

Digital Elevation Model Goal Node Short Route Initial Node Autonomous Mobile Robot 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    I. Millington and J. Funge, Artificial Intelligence for Games, 2nd ed. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2009.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. Ferguson and A. Stentz, “Field D*: An interpolation-based path planner and replanner,” in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Robotics Research (ISRR), October 2005.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Nash, K. Daniel, S. Koenig, and A. Felner, “Theta*: Any-angle path planning on grids,” in In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), 2007, pp. 1177– 1183.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. M. noz and M. D. R-Moreno, “Improving efficiency in any-angle path-planning algorithms,” in 6th IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Systems IS12, Sofia, Bulgaria, September 2012.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Choi, J. Y. Lee, and W. Yu, “Fast any-angle path planning on grid maps with non-collision pruning,” in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, Tianjin, China, December 2010, pp. 1051–1056.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. Daniel, A. Nash, S. Koenig, and A. Felner, “Theta*: Any-angle path planning on grids,” Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, vol. 39, pp. 533–579, 2010.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Botea, M. Muller, and J. Schaeffer, “Near optimal hierarchical path-finding,” Journal of Game Development, vol. 1, pp. 1–22, 2004.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. Yap, “Grid-based path-finding,” in Advances in Artificial Intelligence, ser. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2338. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, 2002, pp. 44–55.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. Ayorkor, A. Stentz, and M. B. Dias, “Continuous-field path planning with constrained path-dependent state variables,” in ICRA 2008 Workshop on Path Planning on Costmaps, May 2008.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Bresenham, “Algorithm for computer control of a digital plotter,” IBM Systems Journal vol. 4, pp. 25–30, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de AutomáticaUniversidad de AlcaláMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations